<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Sponsorships - ReadWriteWeb</title>
      <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sponsorships/</link>
      <description>Sponsorships on ReadWriteWeb</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 Richard MacManus</copyright>
      <managingEditor>readwriteweb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.23-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Announcing Our New Contextual Link Advertising Product - Built by Hakia</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/hakia_logo.png" width="150" height="67" />This month we are offering some additional value to our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sponsors_post_16may09.php">long-term sponsors</a>. It's a new type of <em>contextual link advertising</em> and we think it is important to the future of blogging as a business. For our wider audience, some of whom operate websites that are monetized through advertising, the background may be interesting.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=15073&amp;cb=15073' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=15073&amp;n=15073' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>How Does It Work?</h2>

<p>Here is an example:</p>

<img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/contextual_link_example.jpg" />

<p>The sponsor's name is clickable and points to the sponsor's landing page.</p>

<p>All that our sponsors have to do is provide us with up to three "trigger phrases" that define their business. A phrase can be a single word or two linked words. For example:</p>

<ul>
<li>Hosting (single word)</li>
<li>Dedicated server (two linked words)</li>
<li>Web hosting (two linked words)</li>
</ul>

<p>Think of these as search terms. It is search advertising within ReadWriteWeb. More importantly, it is in context, in posts that are relevant.</p>

<p>The idea is (a) to offer value to our readers by providing advertising links in the context of what they are reading and therefore more likely to find of interest, and (b) to offer a higher level of engagement to our advertisers, resulting in both more branding impressions and click-throughs.</p>

<h2>Background on the Technology</h2>

<p>We experimented with this manually to test whether the theory made sense and whether both readers and advertisers got some value from it. As you can imagine, doing this manually is difficult at any level of scale. So, we hunted for a technology partner who could build what we envisaged. This was not a simple technical challenge. What is easy for a human to do (read an article and quickly determine which phrases are most relevant) is quite hard for a search engine to do.</p>

<p>We needed an engine that would return ranked/scored results. We decided to limit the number of ads to three per post. Any more would detract from the reader's experience. We imagined that such an engine could come up with more than three matches for a sponsored trigger phrase in a single post, so we needed the engine to return the three <em>most</em> relevant sponsored trigger phrases.</p>

<p>That raised the bar considerably.</p>

<h2>Our Partner: Hakia</h2>

<p>We were delighted to find a partner that could jump this high bar. Even better, the partner is also a ReadWriteWeb sponsor (so it will have its own sponsored trigger phrases matched by the engine). Our partner is <a href="http://hakia.com">Hakia</a>.</p>

<p>For those who don't know Hakia, check out its semantic search engine. It was a meeting of minds from the start. When we outlined our vision of what we wanted, it was clear that Hakia was headed in the same direction. Becoming partners to make it happen was a natural decision. Increasingly, we see our ability to partner effectively as being a core competency. We build our business with partners and couldn't imagine it any other way. Hakia clearly shares this partnering philosophy and competence.</p>

<p>Together with Hakia, we have big plans for what to do with this in future. We see it as something of a native revenue model for blogging. As always, we are keen to hear your feedback in the comments.</p>

<p><em><strong>Interested in being a ReadWriteWeb sponsor?</strong> ReadWriteWeb is one of the most popular blogs in the world and is read by a sophisticated audience of thought leaders and decision-makers. <a href="mailto:sales@readwriteweb.com">Email our COO Bernard Lunn</a> for all the details.</em></p>

]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/announcing_contextual_link_advertising_partnership_hakia.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/announcing_contextual_link_advertising_partnership_hakia.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/announcing_contextual_link_advertising_partnership_hakia.php</guid>
         <category>Sponsorships</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Bernard Lunn</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Thanks RWW Sponsors; Packages Available June-July</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you to our sponsors, for supporting ReadWriteWeb's mission to provide in-depth coverage of Web apps and trends. <b>To enquire about sponsor slots on ReadWriteWeb, please <a href="mailto:editor@readwriteweb.com">email us</a> for a Media Kit.</b> We are currently booking June and July spots; and we offer discounts for signing up for 2 or more months.</p>
<p>ReadWriteWeb is ranked the <u>10th most popular blog in the world</u>, according to Technorati. Our site is read by tech and media professionals, early adopters, developers, designers, analysts, CIO's, VC's, media execs, leading thinkers.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=6398&amp;cb=6398' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=6398&amp;n=6398' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>Here are our current sponsors:</p>

<p><a href="http://d.openx.org/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=375__zoneid=237__cb=e6a29c1902__maxdest=http://searchanalytics.compete.com/?src=rww001" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Compete Search Analytics</a> is a way to build and optimize search marketing campaigns.</p>

<p><a href="http://d.openx.org/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=500__zoneid=238__cb=8a1521613d__maxdest=http://www.synthasite.com/make-free-website.php?gad=CMXmv_kFEghpe9s7s_HnMxjrip34AyCN1txL" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">SynthaSite</a> enables you to make your own website in minutes, using Drag & Drop. It's free and no download is required.</p>

<p><a href="http://d.openx.org/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=376__zoneid=241__cb=c2a5de6dde__maxdest=http://www.userplane.com/webmessenger/index.cfm?utm_source=readwriteweb&utm_medium=banner&utm_content=wm2" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Userplane</a> is a provider of communication software for online communities. As well as instant messaging, Webmessenger 2 has a Presence system that allows sites to display and leverage online user presence anywhere. </p>

<p><a href="http://d.openx.org/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=502__zoneid=242__cb=119bb0fe23__maxdest=http://www.rackspace.com/383?CMP=readwriteweb_sponsorship_125x125_smb_may_383" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Rackspace</a> provides dedicated server hosting.</p>

<p><a href="http://d.openx.org/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=530__zoneid=242__cb=a336e38a2b__maxdest=http://partners.thumbplay.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Thumbplay</a> is the fastest-growing and largest mobile content provider in the U.S., offering ringtones, videos, games and graphics to mobile phone users across all major U.S. carriers.</p>


<p><a href="http://d.openx.org/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=506__zoneid=249__cb=531c6ea0eb__maxdest=http://conferences.oreilly.com/gspeast" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">O'Reilly Media's Graphing Social Patterns</a> is a conference for developers and marketers building and distributing apps for MySpace, Facebook, OpenSocial and other social networking platforms. It is on June 9-11, 2008 in the Washington, DC area.</p>

<p><a href="http://d.openx.org/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=378__zoneid=244__cb=6b3dba9bd7__maxdest=http://www.wildapricot.com/default.aspx?utm_campaign=RWW&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=readwriteweb.com&utm_content=W20NP" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Wild Apricot</a> offers Membership Database Management Software for non-profits and associations.</p>

<p>
<a href="http://d.openx.org/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=501__zoneid=243__cb=f449c39838__maxdest=http://www.centraldesktop.com/l?sr=rww&sy=wk_biz_blue" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Central Desktop</a> offers a set of Wiki Tools for business teams (not the IT department). There's no download, it's delivered on-demand. There is a 30 day free trial.</p>


 <p><a href="http://www.quintura.com/" onClick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/quintura');" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Quintura</a> is a visual-based search engine. Currently it is offering to display your brand (via graphical ad) in the search cloud on Quintura.com for free - <a href="http://special.quintura.com/" onClick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/quintura_special');" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">click here</a> for details.</p>

<p><a href="http://d.openx.org/ck.php?oaparams=2__bannerid=505__zoneid=254__cb=ac68b50e18__maxdest=http://www.mediatemple.net/?utm_campaign=rww&utm_medium=banner&utm_source=readwriteweb.com&utm_content=fish" rel="nofollow">MediaTemple</a> provides hosting for RWW and <a href="http://www.sixapart.com" rel="nofollow">SixApart</a> provides our publishing software MT4.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/thanks_rww_sponsors_26may08.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/thanks_rww_sponsors_26may08.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/thanks_rww_sponsors_26may08.php</guid>
         <category>Sponsorships</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:38:37 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Sponsor Opportunity: Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Next week is the last week of my sponsorship arrangement with Onfolio, so I'm putting feelers out for another Web 2.0-savvy company to sponsor my popular <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002840.php">Weekly Wrap-up</a>. I've been writing this weekly column since the beginning of January this year - never missed a week. It's become the premium offering of my weblog and the two sponsors I've had so far, <a href="http://www.theport.com">ThePort Network</a> and then <a href="http://www.onfolio.com/">Onfolio</a>, have been very happy with the results. They each sponsored the Wrap-up for 3 months and so I'm looking for a similar arrangement again.</p>

<p>If you're a Web 2.0 company wanting to get some high quality exposure on a <a href="http://top500.feedster.com/">top weblog</a> (and a privileged place in the Father of Web 2.0's RSS feed), then <a href="mailto:readwriteweb@gmail.com">send me an email</a> and let's talk!</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4544&amp;cb=4544' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4544&amp;n=4544' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sponsor_opportu.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sponsor_opportu.php</guid>
         <category>Sponsorships</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:36:04 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Site News</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm pleased to announce the first <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com">Read/Write
Web</a> sponsor: <a href="http://theport.com/">ThePort Network</a>. They will be
sponsoring my <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002692.php">Web 2.0 Weekly
Wrap-Up</a> for the next 3 months, which I'm thrilled about! ThePort Network has an
exciting Web 2.0 product that is currently in the process of being launched. I've had a
walk-through of it and I was very impressed!</p>

<p>In other news, tomorrow morning I'll be launching a <b>new feature on Read/Write
Web</b> which I think you'll enjoy. I'm also running on a stricter publishing timetable
now. I'm aiming to publish all my Web 2.0 news and views posts to coincide with breakfast
time in the United States (where most of readers come from, I think). This generally
means publishing at 10-11pm New Zealand time so as to catch the early bird on that same
day in the States - in a sense I'm a day ahead of most of you ;-)</p>

<p>One last thing for now. I'm still looking for sponsors for the rest of Read/Write Web
(including the new feature I'm about to launch). So feel free to <a
href="mailto:readwriteweb@gmail.com">email me</a> if you'd like to know more.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4399&amp;cb=4399' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4399&amp;n=4399' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/site_news.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/site_news.php</guid>
         <category>Sponsorships</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:37:34 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Experiment Over</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My 3 month contract with Marqui is up and I've decided not to renew. I'll write a summary post in due course, after things have settled down a bit.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4374&amp;cb=4374' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4374&amp;n=4374' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/experiment_over.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/experiment_over.php</guid>
         <category>Sponsorships</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:43:16 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 21-27 Feb 2005</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="reviewsimage" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/oscar.jpg"
alt="oscar" border="0" /> <b>This week:</b> AP's RSS feeds, Enterprise RSS developments
(Newsgator, Nooked), professional bloggers (Kottke, Darren Rowse), Odeo (podcasting),
Ajax. p.s. headers in honour of the Oscars.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h2>Best Use of RSS Feeds by a News Collective</h2>

<p>And the winner is: <a
href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/fronts/RSS_FEEDS?SITE=APWEB&amp;SECTION=HOME">Associated
Press</a>! ...um, or <a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsrss.jhtml">Reuters</a>. Because
they both have RSS feeds. Hmm, seems the Oscars theme for this post has already broken
down. Anyway, AP joined the RSS revolution this week and so now the two brandname news
collectives have them. <a
href="http://susanmernit.blogspot.com/2005/02/rss-news-associated-press-launches-rss.html">
Susan Mernit</a> broke the news and has the main details. <a
href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/archives/2005_02_24.html#009127">Jeff Jarvis</a> wonders
how the RSS brand-building moves by AP and Reuters will affect their customers. <a
href="http://www.globelogger.com/item.php?id=310">Moonwatcher</a> has an interesting take
on that too: "Media brands are finding their content atomized, their brands diluted, and
their content wholesalers going retail."</p>

<p><a
href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2005_02_24.shtml#012478">PaidContent.org</a> has
some quotes from an AP honcho, who says "it's really a strategy to drive traffic to
member news sites as well as to AP news."</p>

<p>Ultimately, I think it's a strategy to raise the profile and impact of AP's brand. I'm
following all this closely, because I'm intensely curious to see how <a
href="http://journalist.org/2004conference/archives/000079.php">Tom Curley</a>'s (President and CEO of AP) "content will be more important than its container" theories will be
put into practice.</p>

<div class="sponsor">
<p><i><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002493.php">Sponsored Link:</a> Sorry
for the advertising, but allow me to link to my sponsor, <a
href="http://www.marqui.com/">Marqui</a>. They've been very nice to me.</i></p>
</div>

<h2>Best Enterprise RSS Development (of the past week)</h2>

<p>Again the Oscars analogy breaks down, because there is more going on in the Enterprise
space than the two companies I'm about to mention. But humour me... Firstly, Newsgator is
an RSS Aggregator that I've not written enough about (compared to Bloglines especially).
But they're doing some very interesting things in the Enterprise space. Greg Reinacker <a
href="http://www.rassoc.com/gregr/weblog/archive.aspx?post=753">recently announced</a>
the NewsGator platform roadmap. He said: "Our general plan here is to expose nearly
everything in NewsGator Online via API, and allow folks to build applications that
leverage our platform in unique ways." Also Charlie Wood (aka <a
href="http://www.globelogger.com">Moonwatcher</a>, one of my current fave blogs) has
joined Newsgator as its VP, Enterprise Solutions. Charlie was <a
href="http://www.globelogger.com/item.php?id=302">hired due to his blog</a>, something
I'm still waiting (im)patiently to happen to me! :-)</p>

<p>Another company doing good things in the Enterprise is <a
href="http://www.nooked.com/">Nooked</a>. They specifically target corporate comms people
- their main bullet point is to "Use RSS to deliver real-time marketing information
directly to journalist and clients". Nooked recently launched <a
href="http://dir.nooked.com/home.dir?location=52">a directory</a> of corporate RSS feeds,
a manually-edited Yahoo-style directory. NB: Fergus Burns, the Nooked CEO, did email me
with that news. But I've had my eye on Nooked for a while now, so I'm not mentioning them
just because he emailed me. Although he did say he's a fan of my blog, so that always
helps ;-)</p>

<h2>Best Professional Blogger</h2>

<p>This was a high-profile meme this week, thanks mainly to <a
href="http://www.kottke.org/05/02/kottke-micropatron">Jason Kottke announcing</a> that he
will be running kottke.org as a full-time job from now on. He's calling it a
"micropatron" business model, because he's asking his many readers to chip in with
micropayments. He's eschewing advertising entirely, which is a brave move but one which
probably only he and a few others could pull off. Already he's gotten a lot of attention
and loads of people have blogged that they've given him money. So it seems to be
working.</p>

<p>Also a blogger from across the ditch from me, Darren Rowse from Australia, caused a
lot of people to get green with envy when <a href="http://www.buzzmarketingwithblogs.com/weblog/item/interview_with_problogger_darren_rowse/">he revealed</a> he's earning six figues (US money!)
via his blogging activities. The small print? He has 17 blogs and posts around 25 posts
per day 7 days per week. Also it's worth noting <a
href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/25/earning-a-six-figure-income-from-blogging/">
how he came up</a> with the six figure figure: "the figure is calculated on a number of
income sources including private advertising deals, affiliate programs, impression based
ad programs, Adsense, BlogAds, text ads and blog consulting revenues etc."</p>

<p>So it includes "consulting". It also seems to be the result of a lot of daily sweat
for Darren to make that kind of money - i.e. grind, work. It's not from <a
href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/26/100000-to-blog-on-dukes-of-hazzard/">blogging
about The Dukes of Hazard</a>, that's for sure.</p>

<h2>Best Media Coverage Of A Podcasting Service</h2>

<p>Hands down this award goes to <a
href="http://www.evhead.com/2005/02/how-odeo-happened.asp">Evan Williams'</a> (of Blogger
fame) <a href="http://odeo.com/">Odeo</a>, which got enviable <a
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/25/technology/25podcast.html">coverage from The NY
Times</a>. It upset Dave Winer in particular, who thinks he's <a
href="http://www.thetwowayweb.com/2005/02/26#a361">not being given enough credit</a> for
helping to invent podcasting. I think he's got a point, but I would be remiss if I didn't
in turn point out <a href="http://gonze.com/weblog/index.cgi/histcast.ongoing">Lucas
Gonze's efforts</a> in another 'credit where credit is due' campaign re
podcasting.</p>

<p>btw, speaking of giving credit... it's great to see Dave Winer has resurrected the <a
href="http://www.thetwowayweb.com/">Two-Way Web</a> blog. That sub-blog of Dave's was a
key influence early in my blog career - ref <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001657.php">my very first R/WW post</a>.</p>

<h2>Best New Web App Approach That Isn't Really New</h2>

<p><a href="http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000385.php">Ajax</a>
is <i>the</i> trendy method of developing Web 2.0 apps right now. Ajax means "Asynchronous JavaScript +
XML" and according to the write-up "it represents a fundamental shift in what&rsquo;s
possible on the Web." I got a lot out of this article, however I was brought back down to
earth with a thud when I emailed the article around to the programmers in my team at
work. I was informed that those techniques (especially the xmlHttpRequest object) have
been around for a while now and, although they're now supported by most browsers, they
can be expensive for an organisation to deploy. Point humbly taken. I'll give the last
word though to <a
href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/02/18/08OPstrategic_1.html">Jon Udell</a>, who
says: "The modern browser is an XML-aware client. Savvy Web developers have known about
these features for a while, but now Google has legitimized them and pushed them squarely
into the mainstream."</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4371&amp;cb=4371' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4371&amp;n=4371' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_6.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_6.php</guid>
         <category>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-Ups</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:43:33 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 14-20 Feb 2005</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A look back at the week that was in the world of Web 2.0. <b>This week:</b> Google's AutoLinks feature, IE7, NY Times buys About.com, more Big Media blogging coverage, Bloglines hacks.</p>

<div class="sponsor">
<p><i><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002493.php">Sponsored Link:</a> Shout-out to my sponsor, <a href="http://www.marqui.com/">Marqui</a>. Their
CMS software <a
href="http://www.marqui.com/Solutions/_Paperless_Brochure/_Brochures/brochure02150508.aspx">
now powers</a> Chicago radio station WVON's website.</i></p>
</div>

<h2>AutoLinks and Annotation</h2>

<p>Ever since Google made it big, many people have been looking for a chance to pin the
'evil' label on them - especially as one of their <a
href="http://www.google.co.nz/corporate/tenthings.html">company philosophies</a> is to
'do no evil'. This week some folks pounced on Google for <a
href="http://news.com.com/Googles+linking+toolbar+raises+ire+online/2100-1032_3-5582792.html">
adding an AutoLink feature</a> to its <a href="http://toolbar.google.com/">Google
Toolbar</a>. The issue? It has similarities to a controversial old Microsoft feature
called SmartTags. According to Google, AutoLink is this:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"The online review of a great new restaurant has the place's address but no map. You
could type the restaurant's street, city, and ZIP code into the search box, but why
bother, when clicking the Toolbar's AutoLink button will automatically create a link to
an online map (US addresses only)? AutoLink can also link package tracking numbers to
delivery status, VIN numbers (US) to vehicle history, and publication ISBN numbers to
Amazon.com listings."</p>
</div>

<p>What's getting folks riled up is that AutoLinks enables Google to create links to
their own content, using your webpage as the context. According to CNet News:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"...trademark attorneys and security experts say that AutoLink could face problems,
because Google modifies the underlying HTML of a Web page to deliver the added
links."</p>
</div>

<p>There's a beauty of a conspiracy theory attached to this too. <a
href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/20/1926227">Slashdot explains</a>:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"Jeff Reynar - was the lead SmartTag Program Manager while at MS and is reportedly now
a Google Product Manager who's being credited as AutoLink's creator."</p>
</div>

<p>The most interesting thing about this for me is the <b>annotation</b> angle.
Annotation has long been a desired feature for web browsers - e.g. the W3C's
browser/editor <a href="http://www.w3.org/Amaya/">Amaya</a> has extensive annotation
features. <a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2005/02/17/free_the_user_a">Anil Dash</a>
is one person keen on annotation in this manner - he suggested <a
href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2005/02/17/free_the_user_a">on his blog</a> (also quoted by CNet) that "once your HTML page gets to my machine, it's mine to rip, mix and
burn.".</p>

<h2>Is That IE7 In Your Pocket, Or Are You Just Pleased To See Me?</h2>

<p>Speaking of browsers... the much anticipated Internet Explorer 7 was <a
href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/02/15/373104.aspx">announced</a> by Microsoft
this week. Only trouble is, there's little evidence of innovation. The upgrade
seems to be mostly about improved security. Also the beta IE7 won't be available until
"this summer" (US summer that is). So, like, what's to get excited about? Or as I
mentioned in <a
href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/02/15.html#a9441">Scoble's</a> comments
section: "What, no read/write browser? No RSS aggregation? Where's the innovation,
c'mon..."</p>

<p>To be fair, maybe there will be some innovation in the backend - as <a
href="http://www.ensight.org/archives/2005/02/16/ie7s-feature-list/">Jeremy Wright
suggests</a>. But I'd like to see some real ground broken, for a change...</p>

<h2>NY Times Buys About.com - Gains Web 2.0 Street Cred</h2>

<p>The New York Times announced they <a
href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2005_02_17.shtml#012387">will buy About.com for
$410 million</a>. There was a great meme going round the week leading up this: About.com
represents blogging 1.0, whereas the likes of weblogsinc and Gawker are blogging 2.0. My
take on that theory <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002654.php">is
here</a>. Nevertheless lots of people think the NY Times deal was a good one for the venerable newspaper. My
picks for in-depth analysis: <a
href="http://susanmernit.blogspot.com/2005/02/aboutcom-why-nytimes-has-bought-gold.html">Susan
Mernit</a>, <a
href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2005_02_17.shtml#012397">paidcontent.org</a>
(plus <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2005_02_17.shtml#012387">audio
interview</a>), VC <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2005/02/blogging_10_con.html">Fred
Wilson</a>, <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001275.php">John Battelle</a>
(great headline too! "About The New York Times: Deep Into Web 2.0 Now"), <a
href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2005/02/20/abt_nyt.html">Jay
Rosen</a>, <a
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/18/business/media/18times.html?adxnnl=1&amp;adxnnlx=1108947117-c0YwtrBVMKI/WAHK9T8M1w">
NY Times article</a>.</p>

<p><b>Key Quotes:</b></p>

<p><a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2005_02_17.shtml#012387">Martin
Nisenholtz</a>, CEO of New York Times Digital: "The model we've acquired is <b>a web 2.0
model</b>; it's not a centralized model, it's a decentralized model where the content is
created by passionate individuals who have a competency and a desire to reach the public
and that scales into many, many categories and it scales potentially
geographically."<br />
<i>(emphasis mine)</i></p>

<p><a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2005/02/blogging_10_con.html">Fred Wilson</a> nails
it: "If the content that is created on the edges starts to show up in the middle and the
content that is created in the middle starts to show up on the edges, that will be a big
deal."</p>

<p><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001275.php">John Battelle</a>: "I think
microcontent is key to winning in the Web 2.0 publishing world." [and] "As Martin told me
when I pinged him after the deal: 'We're deep into Web 2.0 now.'"</p>

<p><a
href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2005/02/20/abt_nyt.html">Jay
Rosen</a>: "The second life of content, made possible by search, is of critical
importance to journalists whose work is on the Web. (That's almost all journalists.)"</p>

<h2>Big Media Blogging Coverage - Chicken Bloggers Outed</h2>

<p>Ahhh, a warm fuzzies <a
href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050219/internet_profile_blogging_couple_5.html">Associated
Press article</a> about SixApart: "The couple's odd chemistry cooked up Six Apart Ltd., a
startup that has helped popularize the "blogging" craze, with millions of people
worldwide maintaining online personal journals that dissect everything from politics to
poultry."&nbsp;</p>

<p>Poultry??</p>

<p>In other news <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com">Weblogs Inc</a> was named as one of
BusinessWeek's <a
href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/feb2005/tc20050217_6590.htm">Five
Net Names to Watch in '05</a>, which founder <a
href="http://calacanis.weblogsinc.com/entry/1234000357032242/">Jason Calacanis</a> was
obviously chuffed about.</p>

<p>Commenting on the above two stories, <a
href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/20/0827201">Slashdot notes</a>: "Business Press Pays Attention To Blog Industry".</p>

<h2>Techy Web 2.0 Highlights</h2>

<p>Rather than a single techy post, it was two bits of Web 2.0 hackery that caught my
attention this week. Firstly, <a
href="http://erikbenson.typepad.com/mu/2005/02/it_was_a_pretty.html">Erik Benson</a>
managed to convert his entire weblog into a Bloglines API-powered site:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"I made a folder in Bloglines that has all of the RSS feeds around the web that have
stuff that I've written/done. Then I used the Bloglines Web Service to get an aggregated,
normalized feed of all my content in one stream..."</p>
</div>

<p>He <a href="http://erikbenson.typepad.com/mu/2005/02/using_bloglines.html">explains
how he did it</a> in a later post (nb: I noted in the comments that it'd be cool to make
this available to us non-programmers via an easy-to-use web service).</p>

<p>Speaking of <a href="http://www.bloglines.com">Bloglines</a> (which I nearly always do
in these weekly wrap-ups), Joshua Tyler has created a neat app called <a
href="http://joshtyler.com/test/myblogs.html">Chameleon</a>, built using the Bloglines
Web Services. It's basically an alternative interface to Bloglines and has some nifty
personalization features, such as keeping track of "which feeds you read, how often, and
when". I've had a play round with it and it's a great example of value-add using a publicly available API.</p>

<h2>Summary</h2>

<p>That's it for another week. As always, I value your feedback. Please leave a comment
or send me an email at readwriteweb AT gmail DOT com.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4367&amp;cb=4367' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4367&amp;n=4367' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_5.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_5.php</guid>
         <category>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-Ups</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:42:19 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 7-13 Feb 2005</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What's been happening in the world of "Web two dot oh" (<a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/gems/jeff_bezos_web2.txt">as Jeff Bezos pronounces
it</a>) this week? Let's find out.</p>

<p><i>First allow me to give a shout-out
to my sponsor, <a href="http://www.marqui.com">Marqui</a>. Their CMS software <a
href="http://www.marqui.com/Solutions/_Paperless_Brochure/_Brochures/brochure02110501.aspx">
now powers</a> the <a href="http://www.lincolnbicentennial.gov/">Abraham Lincoln
Bicentennial Commission website</a>.</i></p>

<h2>Bloglines Sale (my last comment on it, I promise)</h2>

<p>The Bloglines sale to Ask Jeeves continued to generate chatter in the blogosphere,
including from <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002653.php">yours truly</a>.
To sum up: Bloglines got a big payout and the public discovered that Ask Jeeves still
exists, which no doubt pleased Ask Jeeves. Bonus points go to Eric Lunt from Feedburner,
who <a href="http://www.burningdoor.com/eric/archives/000722.html">predicted</a> the
acquisition way back in September 2004!</p>

<h2>Salon Sucks</h2>

<p>In other news, the goal-setting app <a href="http://www.43things.com">43 Things</a> got a <a
href="http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2005/02/08/tagging/index_np.html">nice positive
write-up</a> from Salon... and 24 hours later got kneecapped by a <a
href="http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2005/02/08/43/index_np.html">particularly nasty
piece of gutter journalism</a> from the same publication! Shame on you Salon. Luckily for
us bloggers, we can read the real story from <a
href="http://robotcoop.com/weblog/52/on-background">The Robot Co-op</a> themselves and
reputable people like <a
href="http://www.kottke.org/05/02/43-things-amazon-conspiracy">Jason Kottke</a>.</p>

<h2>Blog Books</h2>

<p>First I noticed <a href="http://blogbinders.com/">Blogbinders</a>, a company that
seemed to sprout out of the LiveJournal community (<a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002647.php">my write-up of them</a>). Then <a
href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001252.php">John Battelle</a> started promoting a
company called <a href="http://www.qoop.com/">Qoop</a>, which has a slick website and a
product line with "Q" stuck on the front of each product name: Q-Print, Q-Publish,
Q-Search... you get the picture, very Q-Cute. John Battelle got a free book of his blog
by them (he has "a buddy who is involved in Qoop"), so looks like they're getting all the
buzz. Nothing wrong with that, it's great marketing by Qoop. But Blogbinders seems like a
cool little company, so worthy of some attention too. Don't forget <a
href="http://www.lulu.com/">Lulu.com</a>, they're another print-on-demand company doing
good things.</p>

<h2>Podcasting Metrics and Specialist RSS Aggregators</h2>

<p><a href="http://www.burningdoor.com/feedburner/archives/001029.html">Feedburner posted
some cool stats</a> about podcasting. They speculated that the market for specialized RSS
clients looks promising: "There's a very interesting statistic that highlights how
different the RSS world will be from the web 1.0 world. Specialized podcasting clients
have quickly entered the ranks of the top RSS clients..."</p>

<p>On this theme, bit of news this week about branded RSS Aggregators - e.g. <a
href="http://www.newsburst.com/8050-10631-0.html">CNET's Newsburst</a> and <a
href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2005_02_03.shtml#012131">Guardian
newspaper</a>.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2005/02/all_news_sites_.html">Steve Rubel
suggested</a> that "the RSS revolution will force online news sites to evolve into
aggregators to retain their eyeball base" and <a
href="http://archive.scripting.com/2005/02/10#newsburst">Dave Winer was also
enthusiastic</a>: "Bottom-line: Aggregator software and the news business, looking
forward, are very tightly bound."</p>

<h2>Techy Web 2.0 Post of the Week</h2>

<p>I thought I'd add another feature to my weekly Web 2.0 wrap-ups. Every week I read
something new about the technical side of Web 2.0 which inspires me. This week's tech
article to check out is from lixo.org, a new blog. He wrote an interesting post entitled
<a href="http://www.lixo.org/archives/2005/02/11/web-service-apis/">Web Services
APIs</a>. A choice quote:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"...everytime I think of a useful service on the web, I end up sketching out its API
first, figure out a few interesting uses for it, and then decide if it&rsquo;s worth or
not implementing."</p>
</div>

<h2>Summary</h2>

<p>Well that's it for another week. No witty headers this week, I'm sorry. I'll bring
them back next week. btw if you have any suggestions for Weekly Wrap-up, do leave a
comment or drop me a line at my Gmail address (readwriteweb AT Gmail DOT com).</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4363&amp;cb=4363' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4363&amp;n=4363' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_4.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_4.php</guid>
         <category>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-Ups</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:11 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Branding Dander</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rafat Ali over at PaidContent.org goes on a <a
href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2005_02_07.shtml#012164">bit of a rant against
Reuters</a> and their form of branding. But first, allow me to give a shout-out to <a
href="http://www.marqui.com/">Marqui</a>, a CMS (Communication Management Software as a
Service) vendor. They are my sponsors and I have to link to them once a week.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Anyway, Rafat says:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"Alright, so this is my Monday riff: I'm sick of Reuters complaining about diluting
its brand. Well, you are a news agency: that much was decided 150 years ago, and last I
checked, agencies, by definition, live by brand dilution. We call it syndication... "</p>
</div>

<p>Apparently Reuter's branding "mumbo-jumbo" is coming from Niall FitzGerald, the
chairman of Reuters. Rafat quotes him as saying: "The first thing we are currently doing
is to define what the brand is because it hasn't been the subject of what I would call a
disciplined brand exercise. What exactly does Reuters represent and who are the people to
whom it has meaning?" he says.&nbsp;</p>

<p>An example of what's got Rafat's dander up is on <a
href="http://yahoo.reuters.com/financeQuoteCompanyNewsArticle.jhtml?duid=mtfh12928_2005-02-06_18-44-14_n06658925_newsml">
this Reuters page</a>, which has two textual-like banners proclaiming:</p>

<p>1. "You are now on Reuters.com: the source of professional-grade information.
Investing. Business. News."</p>

<p>and&nbsp;</p>

<p>2. "Reuters.com - No Spin. No Agenda. Just the Facts. As they happen."</p>

<p>It occured to me that Reuters is trying to brand its data, a la <a
href="http://journalist.org/2004conference/archives/000079.php">Tom Curley's speech last
year</a>. Curley is from Associated Press, a competitor of Reuters. It's a new Web 2.0
world of free-flowing syndication and "atoms" (to paraphrase Curley) and both companies
are trying to keep their brand to the fore in this world of hyper-syndication. Now
granted, Reuters branding attempts as outlined above are rather clumsy. They're taking
what Curley said - e.g. "The Associated Press, in this context, might end up "branding"
facts such as sports polls or rankings, not just stories and photos" - a bit too
literally. Reuters, to keep Rafat's blood pressure in check, please try and be a bit more
subtle in your branding :-)</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4357&amp;cb=4357' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4357&amp;n=4357' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/branding_dander.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/branding_dander.php</guid>
         <category>Two Way Web</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:49:26 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Patronage</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Nearly 2 months into my 3-month <a href="http://www.marqui.com">Marqui</a>
sponsorship, so I thought I'd write down some of my thoughts at this point. There's been
a fair amount of controversy about it, notably from two people who run publishing
businesses using weblogs: <a href="http://calacanis.weblogsinc.com">Jason Calacanis</a>
and <a href="http://www.corante.com/getreal/">Stowe Boyd</a>. Jason went so far as to
unleash a flock of <a
href="http://calacanis.weblogsinc.com/entry/1234000130028169/">righteous chickens</a>
onto us paid bloggers (it would make a great movie: Attack of the Ethical Chickens!). And
I can understand why Jason and Stowe are so upset about the Marqui program: it threatens
their business model. Both of them use blogs, very successfully I might add, as the
foundation of their publishing empires. So the last thing they want is for weblogs to
become, or <i>appear</i> to become, impure or tainted. That's not a good look when trying
to attract advertisers and audiences.</p>

<p>Jason does bring up one very compelling point in the chickens post: what is the line
between writing and advertising? He believes Marqui bloggers cross that line and that is
the crux of his argument. While I disagree with his conclusions, I agree that it's
something we need to consider very closely.</p>

<p>On this point, one of my fellow Marqui bloggers <a
href="http://www.molly.com/2005/01/28/marqui-challenging-the-model/">Molly
Holzschlag</a>, calls her Marqui-sponsored posts "Clearly marked advertorials". I have to
admit that I have never viewed my sponsorship arrangement with Marqui as one where I'm
supposed to write advertorials. It's my understanding that we just need to link to Marqui
once a week, but we can write anything we like about them. If we had to write
advertorials, then I couldn't live by that model. One of Molly's readers summed up quite
nicely my position:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"I&rsquo;d rather read about a sponsor in THIS context ("These are my sponsors.
They&rsquo;re good people and they support this site.") than in the context where you
talk about a product you&rsquo;re not that interested in. In fact this is the only Marqui
post on any weblog that has actually increased my respect for Marqui."</p>
</div>

<p>On this point, <a href="http://www.gonze.com/weblog/index.cgi/2005/01/27">Lucas Gonze
commented</a> on my link last week to Marqui:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"In the open paragraph of his blog entry Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 16-22 January 2005,
my fellow Marqui blogger Richard MacManus acknowledges our sponsor's sponsorship, then
goes on to his normally scheduled blogging [...] I like how light his touch is -- there's
a brief interruption, then it's on to normal blogging -- and I think it will become a
standard model for paid bloggers."</p>
</div>

<p>The best part was that Lucas managed to slip in a "This is a sponsored post" at the
end of that - heh. But seriously, I agree with Lucas. The future of Marqui-like blogging
sponsorships is not in advertorials, but rather in <b>patronage</b> deals. When I googled to
get some back-up on this, I came across a <a
href="http://www.benhammersley.com/weblog">Ben Hammersley</a> <a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,1013313,00.html">article for The
Guardian</a> back in 2003:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"Patronage, too, is returning as a way of funding the online writing and photography
found on the most popular weblogs, although in a somewhat curious manner. Many of the
more dubious internet sites - selling online prescriptions or cheap travel deals - are
turning to the most popular webloggers with a proposal: link to us from your front page,
and we will give you money. These advertisers differ from those using Google Ad-Sense, or
BlogAds, in that they don't care where the links appear on the page, or even if anyone
clicks on them. Rather, they are placing them on popular weblogs for the sake of
increasing their own sites' ranking within Google. Giving patronage to writers for the
sake of acquiring a search engine may not be the classical Renaissance model, but the
Medici would have understood."</p>
</div>

<p>Ben of course has practised what he preached, having since acquired a sponsorship deal with a
cigar company. And that's how I now think of my arrangement with Marqui. They're my
patron - supporting my niche writing on Web Technology. And it works both ways,
because the main benefit Marqui has gotten out of this (apart from all the free publicity
from people arguing about the ethics of it all) is a big injection of PageRank. Any
advertorials that people have written for them are of less value to Marqui, I believe,
than the Google rank and sheer buzz they've gotten from this program.</p>

<p><i>Disclosure: this post is sponsored by Marqui... but then you knew that already ;-)</i></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4349&amp;cb=4349' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4349&amp;n=4349' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/patronage.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/patronage.php</guid>
         <category>Sponsorships</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:28:58 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 16-22 January 2005</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some of the Web 2.0 trends and talk I tracked this week... accompanied by some dodgy
Austin Powers subheaders. Oh and this post doubles for my Marqui shout-out this week.
Thanks to <a href="http://www.marqui.com">Marqui</a> for sponsoring my blog for 3 months.
Oh behave!</p>

<h2>Tagalicious, baby, yeah!</h2>

<p>Flickr and del.icio.us made tagging cool, now every social software app is doing it.
<a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/">Technorati</a>, <a
href="http://robotcoop.com/weblog/49/">The Robot Co-op</a> and <a
href="http://www.metafilter.com/tags.mefi">Metafilter</a> were among the companies
braggin' about taggin' this week. There was also a fair amount of hand-wringing on the
pros and cons of tagging - <a
href="http://www.corante.com/many/archives/2005/01/22/folksonomies_are_a_forced_move_a_response_to_liz.php">
Many-to-Many</a> covered a lot of it and <a
href="http://www.bokardo.com/archives/folksonomy_notes/index.php">Joshua Porter</a> summarized why tagging is a good thing.</p>

<h2>I shall call him&hellip; Mini-me</h2>

<p>Bit of talk in the blog world this week about Big Internet companies buying little
ones. <a href="http://www.internetstockblog.com/2005/01/yahoo_lacks_a_b.html">The
Internet Stock Blog asked</a>: will Yahoo acquire Six Apart?</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"...as these companies [Google, Yahoo, MS] assemble the complete bundle of integrated
personal Web tools, the social networking sites will be acquired, del.icio.us will be
acquired, and... Six Apart will be acquired."</p>
</div>

<p>In another neck of the blogosphere, Andrew Chen of <a
href="http://blog.monkeymethods.org/2005/01/5-reasons-why-feedster-and-technorati.html">Monkey
Methods</a> (nb: a different Andrew Chen from the one in my blogroll) suggested that
Feedster and Technorati "will die". Death in this context meaning that they end up as "a
discount acquisition by one of the portals". Andrew gave 5 reasons and the gist of 1-4 was that Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft are too big and strong for Feedster and
Technorati. OK, he <i>may</i> have a point there. The 5th reason is interesting:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"Feedster and Technorati have, fundamentally, the wrong UI paradigm."</p>
</div>

<p>I think Andrew is wrong on that score and Feedster CEO Scott Rafer hinted <a
href="http://blog.monkeymethods.org/2005/01/5-reasons-why-feedster-and-technorati.html#c110565220436655236">
in the comments</a> why:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"We believe that RSS will change both Internet search and paid-search dramatically and
in a way that Feedster can use to thrive independently."</p>
</div>

<p>With my <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002402.php">Design for Data</a>
theory (see also <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002626.php">my most recent
post on it</a>), I'm exploring a new type of design paradigm for Web 2.0. Feedster and
Technorati are among the companies building this new paradigm. Here's a hint Andrew -
it's not about "stickiness and pageviews" anymore.</p>

<h2>Amazon's Groovy Developers Conference</h2>

<p>Huge props to the <a href="http://aws.typepad.com/aws/">Amazon Web Services Blog</a>
for real-time blogging of Amazon DevCon. I particularly enjoyed the notes of <a
href="http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2005/01/amazon_devcon_r_1.html">Rael Dornfest's
talk</a>, entitled <i>Remix: beyond rip, mix, burn</i>. It inspired me to remix some of
the notes into my own post entitled <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002637.php">Remixing and Speculation on The
Future of RSS</a>, with the theme of <i>Information Remixing</i>.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The 'future of RSS' bit was this: in the not too distant future, more people will
subscribe to topic/tag/remix feeds than feeds of actual people. I wrote <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002638.php">a follow-up post</a> fleshing that
idea out a bit.</p>

<h2>Google's Juice</h2>

<p>Narry a week goes by without Google making some news. This week they hacked around
with one of the Web's fundamental principles - the link. Google created a "no-follow"
attribute for the hyperlink, to try and thwart comment spammers. <a
href="http://news.com.com/Google+aims+to+outsmart+search+tricksters/2100-1024_3-5540740.html?tag=nefd.top">
News.com reported</a>:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"Called a "no follow" tag, the control when placed before pages of blog comments will
signal to Google as it indexes the Web that the pages are to be overlooked. That will
render comment spam ineffectual."</p>
</div>

<p><a href="http://www.google.com/googleblog/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html">Here's
Google's statement</a> in the Google Blog. <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001198.php">John Batelle</a> has some good analysis on
it.&nbsp;</p>

<p>John also reported on the <a
href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001203.php">Google AdWords API</a>, a new
advertising platform perhaps? John said:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"Google is opening up API support for AdWords. This is a big deal (I hope) in that it
lets new ecologies of AdWord-based plays begin to thrive."</p>
</div>

<h2>Schwimmer tries to take away Bloglines' mojo</h2>

<p>Lawyer Martin Schwimmer opened up a can of worms this week, with his request (granted)
to have <a href="http://trademark.blog.us/blog/2005/01/14.html#a1530">his RSS feed
removed from Bloglines</a>. I followed the action in <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002634.php">this post</a>. As yet Bloglines
has not publicly responded to the controversy, but I'm sure we'll be hearing more about
this issue in the coming months. For a more light-hearted take on it (or is it?!),
check out <a href="http://www.denniskennedy.com/archives/2005_01.html#a000562">Dennis
Kennedy's post</a>.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4345&amp;cb=4345' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4345&amp;n=4345' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_2.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_2.php</guid>
         <category>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-Ups</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:42:23 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>In which I recontextualize content for commercial profit</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.pegasusnews.com/">Pegasus News</a> is a self-styled "Journalism 2.0" company that I've been enjoying reading about. In fact the whole "grassroots journalism" movement is interesting, because there are a lot of experienced journalists throwing themselves into the Read/Write Web (the philosophy, not my blog) with incredible gusto. <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/">Jay Rosen</a> and <a href="http://dangillmor.typepad.com/">Dan Gillmor</a> are two in particular that I regularly read. Anyway I came across <a href="http://blog.pegasusnews.com/2005/01/transparency_in.html">this post by Pegasus News</a> today which I thought had some good lessons for the <a href="http://www.marqui.com">Marqui</a> 'pay for blogging' program that I'm involved in. Pegasus News believe that transparency is the vital ingredient in the new journalism 2.0 world when it comes to dealing with advertising and advertorials. In Peg's words:</p>

<div class="quotation"><p>"Here's how I believe the world, or this aspect of it, works:</p>

<p>Even in old-model advertising, what advertisers are buying is access to readers/viewers. (In our model, that's doubly so, although that is manifest in reader action rather than theory.)</p>

<p>From the dawn of time, people-- in the long haul-- only spend their time on news and information that they find credible.</p>

<p>Ergo, the most precious asset you have is your credibility. Credibility = readers = advertisers = profit. There's no other way to do it. No shortcuts. No dodges.</p>

<p>You can't fuck with your credibility. That's not because it's wrong (which I suppose it is), but because you WILL get caught. Immutable law. It WILL happen. Cheat once and you'll get caught twice.</p>

<p>You might be able to short-circuit some of the above over a short haul, but it will catch up with you. I'd say that in recent years, technology and the information society have dramatically accelerated that cycle. Jeff can tell us a bit about that.</p>

<p>You can't depend on pure ethics to do the job, because humans are inherently flawed. It has to make inherent sense in the Business Model."</p></div>

<p>Now I'm taking Peg's words out of the context he placed them in, which was about advertising in Web-based journalism. What's worse, I'm blatently using Peg's words as part of my weekly sponsor's plug! But I'm being transparent about it :-)</p>

<p>It's a new media world of free-flowing atoms and content <a href="http://journalist.org/2004conference/archives/000079.php">set loose</a> from its containers. Marqui are hitching a ride on my atoms - and don't worry, they're paying me a decent fare for the privilege. But everybody has to remember: they're still my words and so I have to be 100% credible and transparent about what I publish. Because who knows where my words may end up.</p>

<p><i>Disclosure: I mentioned and linked to Marqui as part of my sponsorship arrangement
with them. See <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002568.php">here</a> for
details.</i></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4341&amp;cb=4341' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4341&amp;n=4341' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/in_which_i_reco.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/in_which_i_reco.php</guid>
         <category>Sponsorships</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:07:47 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Business Blogging</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned before Christmas that I'm starting a new business and now's the time to
let you all know what it is. It's a new business blogging company, called <a
href="http://weblogsolutions.co.nz/blog/">Weblog Solutions Ltd</a>. It's a 50/50 venture
with another New Zealand blogger, who's a bit shy about revealing his identity right now
(but a lot of you will be familiar with him and his work, because he's developed some
products which many bloggers all over the world use on a daily basis). We're targeting New Zealand
companies in particular with our new business venture, but we're also looking for
overseas work - to take advantage of the exchange rate! You can read more <a
href="http://weblogsolutions.co.nz/blog/about.php">about us</a> and <a
href="http://weblogsolutions.co.nz/blog/services.php">our services</a> on the blog -
which has recently soft-launched. Comments and advice greatly appreciated, especially if
you're a New Zealander who is interested in our company!</p>

<p>Anyway for this week's paid Marqui post, I thought it'd be timely to review <a
href="http://www.marqui.com/">Marqui</a>'s new blog - called <a
href="http://blog.marqui.com/">Marqui's world</a>. My new company is all about business
blogs, so what better topic to write about in my sponsored post. Let's take a look then
at Marqui's effort at setting up a blog and compare it to another recent company blog on
the scene - General Motor's <a href="http://fastlane.gmblogs.com/">GM Fastlane Blog</a>
(which I wrote about <a
href="http://weblogsolutions.co.nz/blog/archives/2005/01/gm-corporate-blog/">on the
Weblog Solutions blog</a> this weekend).&nbsp;</p>

<h2>Content</h2>

<p>They both started about the same time - the first post for Marqui's world was on 30
December and GM Fastlane Blog's first post was January 5. In terms of content, GM's blog
got off to a voluminous start. They've already posted 9 items and some of them are
lengthy. It looks like they had a bunch of posts pre-prepared (a couple of speeches
converted into posts, links to interviews, biographies, plus some actual conversational
posts). Pre-preparing content is a practice I'd recommend if you're launching (any) new
blog, so top marks to GM for that. And what's more, the content is compelling - evidenced
by the 68 comments (and still growing) that have been made to a post about <a
href="http://fastlane.gmblogs.com/archives/2005/01/saturn_product_1.html">GM's new Saturn
brand</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Marqui's world has only 3 posts so far - and none in the New Year. So they're off to a
slow start. The one piece of advice I'd give to them straight off the bat is to post
regularly - momentum is vital in keeping blogs afloat. I should note though that GM
probably has more resources to throw at their blog, being a huge multinational company
and all.</p>

<h2>Target Audience</h2>

<p>GM are obviously targeting car enthusiasts and, judging by all the comments they're
receiving, they seem to be striking a chord with that audience.&nbsp;</p>

<p>As for Marqui, they are targeting marketers. The 3 items so far have been an
introductory post, a post entitled <a
href="http://blog.marqui.com/archives/2004/12/firing_up_the_i.html">Firing up the
imagination</a>, and a post about an SEO paper. Nothing yet that will bring marketers
scurrying out of their business lunches and commenting on Marqui's blog. And remember
that one of the main goals of an external business blog is to get conversations going
with your customers.&nbsp;</p>

<p>However I do think the <i>tone</i> of Marqui's blog is encouraging. It's
conversational and informal - that's good. But the subject matter isn't compelling enough
yet. Nothing against SEO papers, but it's hardly the sort of thing that your customers
are going to get all excited about. Actually, the best piece of content I've seen from
Marqui isn't even on the blog - it was <a
href="http://www.marqui.com/Solutions/_Paperless_Brochure/_Brochures/brochure12220401.aspx">
a write-up by Janet Johnson</a> about "a fascinating breakfast meeting in Portland about
innovation and risk taking in marketing [which] yielded surprising insights". OK,
<i>that's</i> the kind of thing you should be blogging! Talk about your marketing
theories, about innovation in your field, about "surprising insights". That is much more
likely to get marketers conversing with you, than a dry paper about search engine
optimization.</p>

<h2>Links</h2>

<p>If you look at the GM blog, you'll notice they've started to compile a list of links
to other car enthusiast websites and "blogs we like". In the blogging world, this is
known as a 'blogroll' (they may be going out of fashion on the homepage, but generally
most bloggers keep a blogroll somewhere). It's particularly important to maintain a
blogroll on your homepage if you're a new business blog looking to connect to a community
of readers. My suggestion to Marqui is to find out which are the marketing blogs that
interest you, then link to them on the side of your blog. What's more, regularly read
what they're blogging about and comment on that on your own blog (and leave comments on theirs). Two-way communication is
important not just with your target audience, but your community of like minds.</p>

<h2>Design</h2>

<p>I mentioned above that GM probably has many more resources to throw at their blog - and
it shows in their slick design. It's a bit unfair to ask Marqui to match that, but one
thing I suggest to Marqui is to differentiate your blog more from your main website.
Currently it looks too same-y. For the blog to capture the imagination of your customers,
and compel them to converse with you, it needs to have its own identity and (most
importantly) <i>personality</i>.</p>

<h2>Summary</h2>

<p>GM's new blog is off to a great start and the conversations with their customers (and
potential customers) seem to be flowing like wine already. Marqui is by comparison off to
a slow start, but I think the tone of writing they've adopted is promising. They just
need to come up with some more compelling content that their target audience (marketers)
will be excited by. I also suggest they find out who their blogging community is (other
marketing blogs, primarily), and regularly read and link to them. Also a distinct design
for their blog, to give it its own personality, would not go amiss.</p>

<p>That's just a start... OK here's where I add a plug for my new company, <a
href="http://weblogsolutions.co.nz/blog/">Weblog Solutions Ltd</a> :-) Marqui, we're
available to help you improve your blog! That invitation extends to any other company or
organization wanting to get started in the blogosphere, or wanting to put some pep into
their current blog. Feel free to <a
href="http://weblogsolutions.co.nz/blog/contact.php">contact us</a> to talk.</p>

<p><i>Disclosure: I mentioned and linked to Marqui as part of my sponsorship arrangement
with them. See <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002568.php">here</a> for
details.</i></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4336&amp;cb=4336' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4336&amp;n=4336' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/business_bloggi.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/business_bloggi.php</guid>
         <category>Personal</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 21:35:43 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>On story-feeding and lack of kick-ass post</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Time for my weekly plug for my sponsors <a href="http://www.marqui.com">Marqui</a>.
I've been following what the <a
href="http://www.marqui.com/Paybloggers/Bloggers_who_are_Currently_Active.aspx">other
paid bloggers</a> are doing and a lot of them are writing up the stories that are being
"fed" to us. That's a sensible tactic, so I feel a bit guilty for not going with the flow
and doing the same. But I'm one of those strange people who does not like social pressure
to do things, even when it's in my best interests. Note that it is only a 'social'
pressure, because we're not contractually obligated to write about the stories being fed
to us.</p>

<p>I appreciate Marqui's openness and their generous sponsorship arrangement, but so far
I have no firm feelings either way about the Marqui product. I said at the start that I'd
analyze the product, but for a number of reasons I haven't fully test-drived it yet. One
is that there are too many technical details missing - particularly regarding how to
implement it and how things connect together. Sure I could take the demo for a spin, but
what I really want to do is have a nosy under the hood. Maybe one of their techies will
open up that hood in <a href="http://blog.marqui.com/">their new blog</a>. Another reason
is that I don't want to just list features and regurgitate case studies - I want to have
an 'angle' that will interest my readers.&nbsp;</p>

<p>OK those are all just excuses for my laziness... Marqui does seem like a decent enough
product and its target audience of marketing people <i>is</i> looking for an easy-to-use
and multi-channel communications product, which Marqui advertises itself as. But as <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002609.php">my previous post</a> indicates, I
get emotionally attached to (and therefore write about) innovative Web 2.0 products and
services like Flickr, del.icio.us, Bloglines, Feedburner, PubSub, etc. Marqui isn't one
of those kinds of products - deliberately so, because it's not aimed at geeks like me.
It's aimed at marketing people, who just want an easy way to issue press releases on the
Web.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Now then - coming up there is potentially a topic for me to get my teeth into. There's
a Web 2.0 angle <a
href="http://www.marqui.com/Paybloggers/Stories_Were_Feeding_Bloggers.aspx">on the
agenda</a> in the Marqui program. So when that gets injected into the mix by the Marqui
story-feeders, maybe I will finally get my A into G. I know Marc Canter is probably
waiting for me to write up something about Web 2.0 (because I didn't rate a mention in <a
href="http://marc.blogs.it/archives/2004/12/blogging_and_di.html">Marc's review so far of the paid bloggers</a>). So Marc, I promise you that I will write a kick-ass post
soon :-)</p>

<p><i>Disclosure: I mentioned and linked to Marqui as part of my sponsorship arrangement
with them. See <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002568.php">here</a> for
details.</i></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4331&amp;cb=4331' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4331&amp;n=4331' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_storyfeeding.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_storyfeeding.php</guid>
         <category>Sponsorships</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2005 10:20:51 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Christmas Wrap-up</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year everyone! Also my weekly thanks to <a href="http://www.marqui.com">Marqui</a>
for sponsoring my weblog - I'm much appreciative of their support.</p>
<p>I'll be kicking up my heels for the next two weeks, ruminating over my goals
for 2005 and re-charging my batteries. I'll also be preparing my new business
venture's weblog for go-live in January - very exciting!</p>
<p>btw there's some excellent 2005 predictions going around the weblog world. I
recommend you check out <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001151.php">John
Batelle's post</a> and also <a href="http://andylark.blogs.com/andylark/2004/12/ten_ways_commun.html">Andy
Lark's</a> (Sun executive and fellow kiwi).</p>
<p>If I don't blog again before 2005 (<a href="http://www.tui.co.nz/yeahrightintro.asp">yeah
right</a>), have a happy holiday! :-)</p>
<p><i>Disclosure: I mentioned and linked to Marqui as part of my sponsorship
arrangement with them. See <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002568.php">here</a> for details.</i></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=4328&amp;cb=4328' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=4328&amp;n=4328' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/christmas_wrapu.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/christmas_wrapu.php</guid>
         <category>Personal</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:13:31 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>