ReadWriteWeb

SXSW: World Domination via Collaboration

Written by Sean Ammirati / March 10, 2007 7:07 PM / 4 Comments

Sean Ammirati of mSpoke is at SXSW in Austin, TX (USA). He is reporting for Read/WriteWeb throughout the event.

The SXSW conference has multiple panels going on at the same time. I started my SXSW experience by attending the "World Domination Via Collaboration" panel. The presenters were: Jory Des Jardins Co-Founder, BlogHer LLC; Betsy Aoki Program Mgr, Microsoft; Jessica Hardwick Founder and CEO, SwapThing; Lisa Stone Co-Founder and Pres of Operations and Evangelism, BlogHer LLC; and Jenna Woodul Co-founder, LiveWorld

Overview

Jory Des Jardins opened the panel by stating that in 'web 1.0', community was a "nice to have". In 'web 2.0' the new reality is that community is "the business". The panel then jumped in, focusing back and forth between two topics:

(1) Tactics and policies to build a community organically, and 

(2) How to convince other individuals in your organization to actually spend time and resources developing a community.

Build a Community Organically

The panel discussed two keys to build a community organically. First of all, you need to understand the members and ask them what they want. Second, you need to make sure you protect the community from spammers and trolls.

When discussing how you would understand a community, there were a number of tactics discussed. First of all, the panel pointed out the obvious - that you should greet your members and simply ask them. While obvious, it is amazing how many web services overlook doing this. As an example, the panel pointed to the greetings that early Flickr users received (interesting explanation here).

In addition to these tactics, Jenna strongly recommended that sites consider forming advisory boards. She pointed to the 'eBay voices' as a good example of this advisory board structure. However, she also emphasized the importance of rotating membership of this group. You don't want it to stay stuck with the 'old-timers'.

In terms of protecting a community from spammers and trolls, there was an interesting question posed by a member of the audience: "Is anonymous commenting the cryptonite of an online community?" While everyone agreed that at a minimum, you needed to allow people to create online personas that might appear annonymous to the community (i.e. not their real name), there was some disagreement around whether you should allow completely anonymous commenting. BlogHer does not allow people to comment with out first creating an account. This is so they can block individuals who repeatedly add comments that end up later needing to be moderated; or as Lisa said, they "are building BlogHer not BlogPorn".

Interestingly, Betsy talked about how she allows anonymous commenting, because if people want to take the time to write a comment on her blog (even if it is rude or errant), she wants to react to it. (She does block spam). Betsy also pointed to the Slashdot 'Anonymous Coward' as an interesting example. It shows that the community respects people who comment publicly more, but they are open to taking feedback even from anonymous individuals. She explained that while it has added some work monitoring flame wars in her role at MSFT, she did feel it added value to the Slashdot community. Unfortunately, as this topic was heating up the panel ended - but it was an interesting thing for community builders to consider regarding their own sites.

Convincing an Organization to Build a Community

Previous to starting BlogHer, Lisa was a consultant who helped a number of organizations embrace community. She consistently followed a 2 step process on these projects. First, she would monitor and circulate conversations occurring online, in real time, about the organization. Then she would transition to getting her internal champions (regardless of level) to start blogging in order to champion the concept.

Betsy pointed out that the employee blogging program at Microsoft skipped the first step, but was entirely 'grass roots'. A number of 'feisty people' felt it was important to blog and made it happen. She runs the internal email distribution list and said that they're even more feisty on that list! As senior managers became aware of the blogging, it was discovered that Microsoft had no formal policy around their employees blogging. Note: Microsoft has decided to continue operating without a blogging policy.

Jenna talked about her experience helping large corporations (like BMW and Dove) create community. She explained that at the end of the day her argument comes down to the ROI of customers who are engaged in community versus those who are not. She pointed to an eBay Case Study by Harvard Business Review (link here) that showed participants in an eBay community purchase 56% more and listed 4 times as many items.

Conclusions

This was an excellent first panel of the show. While I wasn't necessarily surprised by what was said, the examples like eBay, Flickr and stories from the front lines at Microsoft were fascinating. I'm sure the community at Read/Write Web has a number of other good examples of community building. Please consider leaving these in the comments below.



2 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2028

Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. I think the level of anonymity you can successfully enable depends on the type of community you are creating.

    When I was a student at UVA's graduate business school a few years ago I campaigned for and managed the launch of the school's first online community.

    While our student team advocated anonymous postings, believing it would allow people who were in some way critical of the school to feel more free to share their ideas, the faculty were adamantly opposed and ultimately made non-anonymity a requirement for our implementation.

    At the time, we were disappointed with the faculty's decision. In hindsight, I think they made the right call. The community has grown to become an integral part of the overalll experience at Darden. Because of the non-anonymity, even rigorous discourse remains civilized.

    This community was simply an extension of an existing one, so anonymity was not necesssary. However, I'm sure that in other types of communities, anonymity might be preferable.

    In my current startup (which we hope to launch within the next few weeks) we've decided to require handles to be the member's real first name and last name initial. We made this decision because our business depends on our community members trusting one another and providing honest feedback. So, it's partially anonymous, but partially not. I hope that it works for us! I'd also be interested to hear from others that have been dealing with the same issues.

    Posted by: Adam Healey | March 10, 2007 8:21 PM



  2. Great information here. I wish I could have attended SXSW, as it seems everybody interesting is there! I think the best way to build a community is to somehow bring together people with similar interests and qualities with a niche site like Slashdot. Then, the community will build itself.

    Posted by: Ilya Lichtenstein | March 10, 2007 8:23 PM



  3. Sean - great post, thanks. I'll be at SXSW on Monday - can't wait to get there.

    I'm interested - how did the audience reacted to the argument for anonymity vs. how the panel did? Were they responding in pretty much the same way?

    And Adam (comment #1) - There is NO WAY I would allow "true" anonymous posts/content on one of my sites. It opens legal issues I would rather not deal with. It invites trolls. But I make damn sure my customers understand that. And that is important.

    Rob

    Posted by: Rob La Gesse | March 10, 2007 9:11 PM



  4. Rob,

    Unfortunately, the question came up right at the end of the panel. The moderator said, "it is ending right as it's getting good."

    - Sean

    Posted by: Sean Ammirati | March 11, 2007 6:10 AM



RWW SPONSORS


FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook



TEXT LINK ADS