The Wall Street Journal put up an interesting article today about profile thieves. These guys don't want your Social Security number or your bank account information, they just want to be cool. Like you. And they do it by ripping off your social networking profile, word-by-word.
If you think that this isn't happening that often, check out the number WSJ is reporting:
"A search on MySpace revealed 700 recent comments that accuse others of stealing headlines, user names, backgrounds, etc."

I would venture that number is actually much higher, based on a rudimentary search I did myself.
First of all, you have to remove people accusing each other of stealing songs. Your profile song is bound to be used by plenty of other people, especially if it's a currently popular tune.
Still, my search results (minus the word "song") come back with 968 results from MySpace alone (2030 leaving song in). The results tend to go something like this: "some (explicative) copied my profile!" If private profiles were searchable, those numbers would likely be even high higher.

The problem extends beyond just social networks, with matchmaking users' profiles being even more at risk since users at those sites are looking for more than just friends, but something even more elusive: love.

The pressure to craft unique online profiles is too much for some.
The business built around the lonely in need of a wordsmith has led to a booming business for online profile writers. Need a better profile? You can visit sites like dating-profile.com, evenamarckatz.com, lookbetteronline.com, e-cyrano.com, and profilehelper.com to name a few.
These sites can write a profile for you or tweak the one you already have to get better results. But, according to the WSJ article, the sites found themselves victims of profile thieves, too. Sample profiles posted on some of these sites have been ripped off and used online.
Maybe the problem is that we all really do like long walks on the beach, after all?

Besides policing the internet for your own creative words and then begging your copycats to take them down, most users only recourse may be to set their profiles to private, "friends only," or limited, depending on the social network. Unfortunately, in doing so, the network would lose some of its openness since everyone has to close their doors and watch their backs.
On dating sites, setting profiles to private is not possible or productive since the idea is to keep your profile public for others to find. In those cases, there is nothing much to do but be flattered.
In the end, our best response to these new identity thieves may be to just decide it's time for a re-write.
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
1. Kudos! I was actually just thinking about the same thing a couple days ago, but you beat me (and Mashable) to it. Really, they -should- be breaking these kinds of stories, but you seem to have your thumb on the matter.
2. Do you have Twitter? I sent a message to Marshall, but wanted to give the message myself too. I'm mayobrains, and I'd like to follow you =)
Keep up the -excellent- reporting.
Posted by: Trisha | February 15, 2008 11:10 PM
There's another set of identity thieves out there, stealing mass feeds from sites such as twitter and jaiku, using people's profile photos and user names to pad out and populate whole websites. I wrote about it on classroom20. http://www.classroom20.com/forum/topic/show?id=649749%3ATopic%3A105305
Posted by: susant | February 16, 2008 6:59 AM
hi
this happening evryday and evrywhere, it seems to be just people are finding out,I read the in an online blog site that some guys copying websites! read more in the blogit247.com
Posted by: tony dating | February 17, 2008 12:34 AM
Some people just want Cool to come in a can, so they copy the profiles of people they think are cool, thinking that's the right way. I think these people are either:
a) sad and want attention from other people
b) sad and want *your* attention
c) malicious and want to use your identity to hurt your reputation among people that know you
I guess the only thing one could do is to be vigilant and inform his/her readers of the presence of a copycat. I think it's no point going after the actual copycat, because I highly doubt that he will change his content, which will only make you more frustrated, and more importantly, he enjoys the attention.
Posted by: nabilah said | February 17, 2008 4:45 AM
Great point about outsourcing creativity... we had JUST had that discussion at about 10pm last night in my office! Great read. I like the layout as well. Keep it up!
Posted by: Brennan | February 20, 2008 8:45 AM
It happens all the time. daing site
Posted by: tony | February 24, 2008 10:35 PM