ReadWriteWeb

The Rebirth of "Web TV"

Written by Sarah Perez / January 13, 2009 7:53 AM / 14 Comments

One of the most apparent trends from this month's Consumer Electronics Show (CES), was the proliferation of flat panel, internet-connected TVs. Nearly every major television manufacturer was demonstrating some sort of web-to-TV integration, including sets that offered Yahoo widgets, MySpace social networking, and Netflix built directly into the TV sets themselves. This isn't the "Web TV" of days past, but a whole new way to internet-enable the living room. This is the year of the "connected TV."

This Isn't Your Parents' Web TV

Remember Web TV? It's still around, believe it or not, now rebranded as MSN TV. With a set-top box and keyboard, you can browse the web from the comfort of your couch. For whatever reason, it didn't take off. From personal experience, after some initial oohs and aahs, our household quickly grew bored with our Web TV box. If you used the service, too, you probably felt the same.

Why didn't it work? Perhaps people didn't really want to use a keyboard in their living room. Or perhaps it just launched too soon. Its heyday was in the 1990's, a time when there wasn't as much compelling content to view. This was long before the launch of sites like YouTube and Hulu. Because of this and more, Web TV never became the revolution that it intended to be.

But today we're seeing a new attempt to revive the the goal of bringing the "internet to your living room." Instead of Web TV, what we're seeing instead are televisions being dubbed "connected TVs."

The New Connected TV

Sans set-top box, these new "connected" TVs have all the web-enabling components built right in. This apparently is what will be the reason for their success this time around...if you believe the hype.

One of the better integrations involves Netflix's deal with Korea's LG Electronics, Inc.Their partnership which will deliver a new line of high-def TVs with the Netflix service built directly into the set itself. With 12,000 titles to choose from at launch, this connected TV is one that's sure to become quite popular if the company can get the pricing right.

Other TV manufacturers including Samsung, Sony, LG, and VIZIO introduced sets with Yahoo widget technology integrated into their products. These widgets don't just provide Yahoo content like Sports and News, but rather deliver a platform on which widgets can be built. Says Yahoo, their platform allows developers to extend their "brand, services, and content" to new users by creating TV widgets using Yahoo's Widget Engine.

Yahoo Widget Engine, Now for the TV

The Yahoo Widget Engine evolved from the Konfabulator platform, a product that delivered some of the very first web-enabled apps that floated on your computer's desktop. These widgets give you quick access to information and news which you can see without having to keep a browser window open.

Now those same web-enabled widgets can be ported over to digital TVs. The Widget Engine provides an entry-level framework and Widget Development Kit (WDK) which allows developers to code for the constrained hardware capabilities of these new connected TVs. In addition, Yahoo's Widget Channel API will provide access to internet technologies including Konfabulator's JavaScript and XML as well as HTML.

There are already a few Yahoo! TV widgets available now and several more have been announced as coming soon. In the upcoming section, widgets from Showtime, Netflix, Blockbuster on Demand, CinemaNow, The New York Times, USA Today Sports, CBS Fantasy Football, Rallypoint Fantasy Sports, Acedo Funspot Games, Flickr, and, of course, Yahoo (News, Weather, Finance, and Video), have been announced.

Twitter from Your TV

Lest we forgot: there will also be a Twitter widget available. That widget alone could usher in a whole new area of interactive television. As we've already seen on channels like CNN, some reporters are currently using Twitter to gather real-time information about events from TV viewers. Imagine how many more people could participate if Twitter was enabled on the television itself. Outside of news, other shows could potentially use Twitter for entertainment purposes, enabling a live back channel where you could Twitter your thoughts or questions about the content you were viewing.

MySpace Brings Social Networking to the TV

Among the widgets available today, Yahoo has announced an eBay widget, a CBS Entertainment widget, and a MySpace widget. It's the MySpace one that's garnered the most press so far as it will enable two-way interaction with the social network and your friends while watching TV.

MySpace widget users will be able to receive dynamic updates from friends, read and respond to messages, browse friends' profiles, photos, and requests, and see status and mood updates. It takes the solitary act of watching TV and turns it into what could be a more social experience. It's easy to imagine groups of friends watching shows together, messaging each other throughout the viewing.

The MySpace widget, like several others, will be ad-supported. That raises the question if these new widgets could become a source of advertising revenue for content producers. As more people time shift TV shows for later viewing, skipping through the commercials with their remote, TV shows' advertising revenues have been affected. Now, TV networks could easily create and deliver widgets for their most popular shows, letting fans interact with each other whenever they watched, as they do on the numerous forum-like TV message boards found across the internet today.

Of course, we could be getting ahead of ourselves here with that last idea - nothing of the sort has been announced. Still, we think it would be a great idea. (Who wouldn't want to join a live backchannel of ABC's "Lost", for example? What is that smoke monster?)

Will Connected TVs Succeed?

Will the new internet-connected TVs work where Web TV failed? It's possible. For one thing, this time we're not just transplanting the internet in its entirety to the living room, where many people already stash their netbooks and notebooks for the quick Google search or email check during their TV viewing.

Instead, the TV experience is simply being enhanced by the web-enabled technologies - which you can choose to use or not use as you wish. If you're just relaxing, you may want to just enjoy the normal passive TV experience. But for certain events - favorite shows, sports, breaking news - you may choose to interact with others via the widgets over social media like MySpace and Twitter. Other widgets like News and Entertainment listings will also be convenient ways to get bite-sized information without having to pull out the computer.

The key point here with these new connected TVs is that the widgets don't interrupt what people think of as the "TV experience." Explains Genevieve Bell, an anthropologist and director of the user experience group in Intel's digital-home group, people have extremely strong bonds to their TV sets. "Any effort to add internet content needs to be just as simple and not interfere with the experiences and behavior patterns the users enjoy." What that means, she says, is that the interaction needs to take place using a conventional remote control - not a computer keyboard or on-screen web browser.

The only question that remains is whether people will buy a new TV just for the widgets? Probably not. This is a fun addition, but not a major technology breakthrough like HDTV. Still, if you're out shopping for a new TV anyway, a connected TV may certainly make your list as one of the sets to consider.



1 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/9773

Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. Good summary, but note that "Connected TVs" are just TVs with the Set Top Box inside, in some ways they are less flexible, especially those tied to a content provider. They are more expensive as they have the STB price to cover.

    "Web TV" - ie connection via a bog standard PC - is still the more flexible and potentially lower cost option, and given the additional content available now and better I/O devices, I wouldn't write it off just yet.

    The trick, as Genevieve Bell noted (and our research over 4 years confirms) is to get "Lean Back" UI/UE into that Web TV system.

    Posted by: alan p | January 13, 2009 8:41 AM



  2. Good review, we currently use a set top box, Roku, to view NetFlix and watch tv shows online using various sites --prefer fancast.com over Hulu, even though they take their feed. The question next will be how the cable companies will view this competition and possibly tighten-up on download limits. Could be an issue.

    Posted by: Dave_L | January 13, 2009 9:08 AM



  3. The basic problem with most of the products and services discussed in this article is that they provide only limited access to the Internet. The providers envision the service as a “Walled Garden” but the consumer is more likely to feel that it is a “Walled Prison”. Consumers have too many years of experience with unlimited access to the Internet on their computers. The will never settle for restricted access to Internet Video.

    However, most flat panel TVs have an abundance of connection sockets that enable numerous Internet-connected devices to be attached. The surprise leader is the laptop computer. Laptops have been rapidly dropping in price and have built in WiFi. In such a configuration, the TV functions as a giant monitor for the laptop and provides unlimited access to Internet Videos


    http://insidedigitalmedia.com/third-generation-television-first-catalyst/

    Posted by: Phil Leigh | January 13, 2009 9:47 AM



  4. I agree with Phil; walled gardens will not work. The trick is to make a normal browser simple enough that you can operate it from your sofa.

    Inspiration from this could come from an unlikely source; the Palm Pre. They've stripped the browser right down to fit a small screen naturally. Exactly the same interface translates to the TV. Of course, you can't touch your TV, but you could use a pointer like the Wii to navigate around instead. Normal remote controls are rubbish anyway.

    Posted by: chris | January 13, 2009 10:28 AM



  5. I really don't think it will work for the same reasons it didn't work before. People really want to use their TV's to watch TV. I know tech geeks like us may differ, but it's still a very small percentage of what America wants. Will they adjust everything towards this? Hard to say. I know the technology and services are different and improved, but don't think the average person needs or wants all these bells and whistles on their TV.

    Posted by: Craig | January 13, 2009 1:18 PM



  6. I'm not sure I'd actually want to see this really hit the market, at least not in my home. I'd prefer keeping the web where it is, and TV where it is, or maybe bring more TV to the web.

    I feel this way because of the amount distractions that the web carries around versus the amount of distractions on TV. There's way more on the web. It might make my TV watching experience seem too...busy? cluttered? complicated?

    Posted by: Corvida Posted on FriendFeed   | January 13, 2009 1:37 PM



  7. @corvida doesn't this go against the general trend of convergence. I forget where I heard the quote, but it goes along the line of the delivery system being unimportant and for non tech users, they will indeed not even know how content is getting to them, it just does.

    Posted by: thomasrdotorg Posted on FriendFeed   | January 13, 2009 1:49 PM



  8. @Thomasrdotorg True, but I care, and they'll care once their TV watching experience becomes an information overload experience.

    Posted by: Corvida Posted on FriendFeed   | January 13, 2009 1:53 PM



  9. @corvida - I'm sure the implementator would not force the widget into a popup advertisement experience ala the common web. Information overload is optional.

    Posted by: Akhmad Fathonih Posted on FriendFeed   | January 13, 2009 11:01 PM



  10. You can already run your own Cable station right at home and watch channels streamed thru the Internet today. I am not talking about connecting your computer directly to TV , but instead using D-LINK 320/320RD/520 device, along with software from tversity.com (do not install DLINK's software). Then you can add your Channels (Streaming URLs) to TVERSITY...and now you have your menu of channels showing up on TV to watch. Therefore for a one time cost of 80-100$, you can now enjoy lot of channels on your TV without any monthly cable bill. Also check out www.wwitv.com for free channels

    Posted by: Oscar A | January 14, 2009 5:02 AM



  11. Thinking of buying the set top box offered by Netflix, is this well worth the price?

    Posted by: Diamonds | January 14, 2009 9:57 AM



  12. Interesting but connected TV's will also carry a larger price, something that you may not want to just jump to yet.

    Posted by: Television Spy | January 14, 2009 10:42 AM



  13. Really? No mention of Boxee? That was by far the biggest story in the space at CES and you didn't mention it at all? Even the Today Show caught wind of it.

    I dunno... weird.

    Posted by: Nate Westheimer | January 15, 2009 9:02 AM



  14. Imagine hearing a joke about an obscure celebrity you haven't heard of and googling them WITH THE REMOTE!

    Posted by: Trent | February 1, 2009 3:16 AM



RWW SPONSORS


FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook



TEXT LINK ADS