A new website called We Dig TV is transforming TV game shows and re-making
them for the internet. The site converts tv programs and formats into Internet tv shows,
making them interactive and a two-way Web experience. As of now they have adapted 4
classic TV game shows and optimised them for broadband use - with the user as the main
participant. The current game shows are: Blockbusters, Countdown, Family Fortunes and
Catchphrase. There are more coming soon, plus they have other shows currently being used
by third party clients.
While the current lot of shows are relatively simple question and answer formats, We Dig TV is also creating more diverse shows. For example, they have just completed a broadband version of Popstars - which allows the user to 'audition' as a singer over the telephone. The game also apparently allows the judges to react online to the perceived quality of the singing (or lack thereof - all you virtual Simon Cowells get your British accents ready!).
So how is We Dig TV going to make money? Well, by traditional advertising of course. We Dig TV is, rather curiously, positioning the advertising as being "an important part of creating an authentic user experience". In other words, they have made traditional broadcast advertisements interactive as well. For example, participants in the Blockbusters game are presented with ad breaks. An example of an advertisement currently running is one for Dettol, which is the same as the TV broadcast version - except that the user can participate using his/her mouse to apply dettol to the kiddies high chair. We Dig TV says that "not only does this mean the user takes note of the ad, it is linked in to reinforcing the message that Dettol kills germs." I for one will be interested to see how these ads are greeted by the users - I'm not sure why people would want to participate in a Dettol ad.

We Dig TV's quest for authenticity even goes as far as getting many of the same celebrities who were involved in the TV versions, to participate in the Web versions of the shows.
The people behind We Dig TV are experienced video game professionals, and their passion for interactive TV shows through. In fact it's fantastic to read about how they started in 2001 and gradually worked their way towards live Web action in 2007:
"2001 was too early to really flex our technical and creative muscles as we were still awaiting the growth of high speed connectivity. So we spent the majority of the next 3 years honing our technology applications in anticipation of broadband becoming mass market. We also worked with a multitude of firms on an online production basis, so as to fund our growth and research. Picking up a few national awards along the way.
Our big break, the moment we had been working towards finally came in the summer of 2003, when we were commissioned by Celador International to develop and produce the Broadband Version of "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?" - a truly ground breaking production that defined the "i-show" format and went on to pick up the 2003 British Interactive Media Association award for Best Broadband Site. "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?" was sold internationally and we were kept on to produce all the versions."
I tried out Blockbusters and found it to be an enjoyable experience - and yes, similar to being on the real life tv show. Screenshots below. Personally I can't see myself playing it much more, but there are no doubt a lot of game show fans out there who will love this. Where this technology will probably have a great take-up is in 5-10 years time when actual TV sets have Internet technology by default, and so tv game shows will (I suspect) be commonly two-way and interactive by then. Right now the technology seems a little ahead of its time, in that mainstream audiences won't flock to it just yet, but it's great that We Dig TV is tackling it now and positioning themselves for the future.


First my pompous webhead theory... I'm usually not a big fan of straight adaptations of a previous generation of technology or media, into the new generation - in this case, from TV to Web. I prefer Web apps and sites to leverage the unique capabilities of the Web environment and offer something new, that will gradually usurp (or maybe just complement) other media. For example, I've always prefered Gmail over Yahoo Mail - because Gmail introduces a number of new 'web native' features, whereas Yahoo Mail is a straight copy of a desktop mail system.
But having said all that, We Dig TV is actually quite compelling and the enthusiasm of the developers is hard to resist. It is also aiming to be a two-way broadband experience - much more interactive and personalized than normal TV. So in that sense they're not just copying the TV shows and putting them onto the Web, but two-way interactivity is being added to the mix. So this seems like one future for TV, although I'd like to think a lot of 'web native' TV scenarios are waiting to arrive too - perhaps even from We Dig TV, which certainly has the experience and brains.
So all in all, I give We Dig TV a round of canned TV audience applause. It's entertaining and also innovative, in an odd TV clone kind of way!
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: We Dig TV Brings Television Game Shows To The Web.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2050
Here is a summary of the week's Web Tech action on Read/WriteWeb. Analysis Posts Google Interview This week Read/WriteWeb finally got an interview with Google, something I've been wanting for a long time. Matt Cutts, head of Google's web spam... Read More
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all Read/WriteWeb posts
I've already play a lot of on this site, and I agree... with except to negatives: I mostly enjoying interactive ads, and as I read on other forums, I'm not the only one. The games are nice and giving the same experience, as I were in the studio. Well done, guys !
Posted by: Robert Michum | March 15, 2007 3:47 AMRobert Mitchum huh? I suspect you work for We Dig TV.
This is a pretty impressive conversion of the games but the adverts make it pretty much unplayable for me. For example, on the Countdown game the length of the adverts was longer than the actual length of game play. Whilst a great fan of the programme and these kind of on-line word-games I'm not going to sit around spending more than 50% of my time watching adverts.
Posted by: Cornea | March 15, 2007 12:03 PMThis is a pretty interesting and unique site. I'm not a big game show fan, but am definitely interested in new and advanced media. This is, in a sense, a great mash--up of conepts -- a uniquecable-bypass TV show.
- Joslyn
Posted by: Joslyn | March 16, 2007 9:22 AMVery nice article! This is interesting and I can't help visualizing being on a game show from right here at my PC! This would be a nice diversion from watching endless video of people attempting to emulate Hollywood on YouTube.
I too, do not like Web 1.0 ads, as creative people should be able to come up with inventive ways to attract people.
I wrote some about Joost and their "top drawer" efforts to transform ads. This is a great article though, thanks!
Phil Butler
Posted by: Phil Butler | March 18, 2007 10:56 AMIf you can't take the interaction to to the TV then take the TV to the inter(NET)action. Good translations of game shows!
Posted by: Carl Hudson | March 22, 2007 8:40 AMHi
Can someone please advise me how i can participate in the CatchPhrase game and where it is held in the UK, Iam really keen and egar to join as i watch all the time.Is there a waiting list?
Many thanks
Nad
Posted by: Nadera | March 27, 2007 7:15 AMGreat article, and great site. I have to say I'm sorry I wasted money on the DVD versions of game shows when We Dig TV versions are much better and free!
As for Cornea's comment, sure there are ads, but they're interactive and definitely not 50% of the game time. They're about 10 or 15 seconds long and you don't just watch them, you play along.
The truth of the matter is, nothing comes for free. If you want the ad-free version of the games you can always "pay to play" - and this appears to offer a cash prize to top players.
Personally, the ads don't impact at all for me and I'm getting a FREE, brilliant online version of some of my favourite shows.
Posted by: Coryn H | April 10, 2007 1:21 AMCool site! How did they get Carol to have every word in the dictionary up on her board though? And how did she know how I worked out my number round? I don't get it but it looks great.
Posted by: Ch4rlie | April 10, 2007 1:36 AMKudos to Richard MacManus for a great article; your unbiased and thorough approach is refreshing. We Dig TV was a great find, I'm still playing Countdown and looking forward to Bullseye coming out. Do you know what other games they're doing?
Posted by: Nathan Wills | April 10, 2007 1:43 AMI'll have a "P" Bob!
Posted by: James | April 10, 2007 1:55 AM