<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Web Office - ReadWriteWeb</title>
      <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web-office/</link>
      <description>Web Office on ReadWriteWeb</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 Richard MacManus</copyright>
      <managingEditor>readwriteweb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:43:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.23-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Adobe&apos;s Upgrades Acrobat.com, Launches New Mobile App</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/acrobat_logo.jpg">Adobe's online office suite, <a href="http://www.acrobat.com">Acrobat.com</a>, is getting its first major upgrade since the service left beta back in June of this year. The new release, launching tomorrow, is an entirely unified experience thanks to the addition of a much-requested file organization tool, explains the service's Director of Project Management Rick Treitman. </p>

<p>Also new are 35 user-requested features, including file searching capabilities and integrations with web services like <a href="http://www.flickr.com">Flickr</a> and <a href="http://images.google.com">Google Image Search</a>. However, one of the most exciting pieces to the upgraded service is the newly launched mobile component. With Acrobat.com's smartphone application, users won't just have access to their files on the go - they can also scan in new documents with their phone's camera. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=17186&amp;cb=17186' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=17186&amp;n=17186' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[

<h2>The New File Organizer</h2>

<p>The one major new feature in this release of Acrobat.com is the file organizer. Before, files could live in three different places on the service. Now all files are accessible through one main interface. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/acrobat_file_organizer.png"</p>

<p>The file organizer itself includes some handy features, too. Instead of using a traditional folder structure like you have on your computer's hard drive, the service introduces something called "collections." These are more like iTunes playlists than file folders (or even labels in Gmail) because files can be assigned to multiple collections instead of having to sit in just one folder. </p>

<p>Another key component to the organizer is a file search tool. Believe it or not, the online service had no way of helping you find your files until now. Although the current search capabilities don't yet offer full text search of your documents, Adobe says that may come further down the road. </p>

<p>Also new is the organizer's "import and edit" feature which lets you open external files directly into the appropriate program so you can begin to work on them online. In the past, you had to first launch the program, then import the file. This time-saving step is more akin to what rival <a href="http://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a> offers via their upload feature except that in Acrobat.com, you don't have to click a link to open the uploaded file - it happens automatically. </p>

<h2>Other New Features</h2>

<p>The various online office programs themselves have seen improvements as well in this new release. Buzzword is leaving beta and now it, along with Presentations, lets you import images from online services like Flickr and Google Images in addition to the images found on your computer. One drawback to this feature, though, is that the online image searches don't offer filtering by license type, so a user could easily get into trouble by adding a copyrighted or otherwise licensed photo into their document if they neglect to check permissions first. </p>


<p>The Tables app, still in beta, now has the ability to do more data sorting and filtering. It also adds new views including a print layout view that shows what the document will look like on the printed page. </p>

<h2>Acrobat.com Comes to iPhone, Blackberry</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/acrobat_iphone_app.png" align="right"> One of the more exciting developments is the new Acrobat.com mobile application which will be made available to Blackberry and iPhone users shortly. Built in conjunction with a company called <a href="http://www.scanr.com/">scanR</a>, the mobile application lets users take advantage of their mobile phone's camera to add new files to the service. After taking the photo, the app uses OCR technology to convert the image to text. How well this works is unknown at this time because the app has not yet arrived in the respective app stores. </p>

<p>The app also lets users view their files in a read-only mode, convert them to PDFs, and share them with others via fax or email. There will be two versions of the app made available - a free version and a premium offering which will allow for more PDF conversions and faxes.</p>

<p>According to Adobe, the Acrobat.com service is faring well. They already have 6 million users and add around 100,000 more each week. While a lot of users are students and SMB owners looking for a free alternative to more expensive Microsoft Office software, the company says they're also seeing the service picked up and used in small workgroups at larger companies. However, Adobe admits that they're not an enterprise play yet and they also won't reveal how many people use the premium version of the service - only that they're "happy" with the number thus far. </p>

<p>If you want to try the upgraded online suite, you can do so at <a href="http://www.acrobat.com">www.acrobat.com</a> as of tomorrow (Saturday, November 21st) at 6 AM EST.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/adobes_upgrades_acrobatcom_launches_new_mobile_app.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/adobes_upgrades_acrobatcom_launches_new_mobile_app.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/adobes_upgrades_acrobatcom_launches_new_mobile_app.php</guid>
         <category>Adobe</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:43:30 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Office Web Apps Expands, More Invited to Join Technical Preview</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/ms_office_logo_jul09.png" />Office Web Applications, the browser-based versions of Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote, are now being made available to more users according to a post on the <a href="http://windowslivewire.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!2F7EB29B42641D59!41617.entry">Windows Live Team blog</a>. The online office suite, which began its initial alpha testing (in Microsoft terms, it's called a "Technical Preview") in mid-September, was originally made available to only a limited number of users. Today, the Technical Preview is opening up, allowing more people to try the Web Apps, Microsoft's first attempt at porting their desktop Office software to the cloud. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=16840&amp;cb=16840' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=16840&amp;n=16840' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>About the Web Apps and the Technical Preview</h2>

<p>Although still limited to users in the U.S. and Japan, participants in the Technical Preview are able to access the web versions of the Office programs through <a href="http://skydrive.live.com">Windows Live SkyDrive</a>, Microsoft's online cloud storage service and a part of their Windows Live suite of <a href="http://download.live.com">tools</a> and <a href="http://home.live.com/">services</a>. </p>

<p>SkyDrive, which provides each user with 25 GB of online storage, is used to host the documents created using the Office Web Applications. For now, the service is entirely free. However, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_launches_office_web_apps_and_office_2010_limited_beta.php">during our earlier interview</a> with <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/Numoto/">Takeshi Numoto</a>, the corporate vice president of the Microsoft Office Product Management Group, we questioned him about future monetization plans for the online suite. He wouldn't confirm any details, only saying that Microsoft was "experimenting" with several options. To date, nothing has changed on that front. </p>

<p>At the moment, the Technical Preview is not offering full access to all the Office programs - only Word, Excel and PowerPoint are currently available. There is a placeholder for OneNote, but it displays a message reading <em>"Still to come..." </em>when clicked. We're told that OneNote support is due later this fall. That should be relatively soon, considering that it's already October.</p>

<p>The web version of Microsoft Word is also incomplete at this time, allowing you to view files but not create or edit them. Only Excel and PowerPoint allow for both read and write access at the moment. </p>

<p>According to Microsoft, the Technical Preview program is designed solely for the purpose of collecting user feedback prior to the broader beta release of the service. No date has been given for the beta launch as of yet but the online suite is due to ship next year alongside <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/">Office 2010</a>, the next version of the company's desktop software suite. </p>

<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nAvBfuaVluI&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nAvBfuaVluI&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>

<h2>How to Join</h2>

<p>If you're interested in signing up for the Technical Preview, you'll need to establish a <a href="https://signup.live.com/">Windows Live ID</a> if you have yet to do so. Hotmail and Windows Live Mail users should already have one - it's your @hotmail.com or @live.com email address. You can then sign up for the Technical Preview program via <a href="http://skydrive.live.com/acceptpreview.aspx/.documents?aobrp=browse">this link</a>. As noted above, you will need to select either the United States or Japan during signup, as those are the only two countries supported at this time. After completing the sign up process and accepting the license agreement, your Windows Live ID will have access to the Web Applications by way of <a href="http://skydrive.live.com/">SkyDrive</a>. </p>

<small><p><em>Disclosure: Sarah Perez also freelances for Microsoft's Channel 10. She is not a Microsoft employee.</em></p></small>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/office_web_apps_expands_more_invited_to_join_tech_preview.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/office_web_apps_expands_more_invited_to_join_tech_preview.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/office_web_apps_expands_more_invited_to_join_tech_preview.php</guid>
         <category>Cloud computing</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:15:05 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>OffiSync: Microsoft Office + Google Docs = the Perfect Office App </title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/offisync_logo.jpg">We recently had the opportunity to test the new Microsoft Office plugin from <a href="http://offisync.com/">OffiSync</a>, which integrates <a href="http://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a> and <a href="http://us20.trymicrosoftoffice.com/default.aspx">Office</a>.  We can sum up our findings with one word: <strong>WOW</strong>. Although still in beta format, the plugin worked extremely well, providing that one missing aspect to the Microsoft Office software suite - an online component for storage, sharing, and collaboration.</p>

]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=15107&amp;cb=15107' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=15107&amp;n=15107' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[
<h2>Wait, What About Office Live?</h2>

<p>In saying that, you may think we're overlooking <a href="http://www.officelive.com">Office Live Workspace</a>, Microsoft's own web-based service for storing and sharing documents with family, friends, or colleagues. After all, it does come with <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=91FE0002-EB00-434B-8726-27911326D2B2&amp;displaylang=en">its own plugin</a> for the Microsoft Office software which allows you to both open and save documents to and from your online workspace. </p>

<p>However, while both Google Docs and Office Live provide online storage and easy ways to share files, Google Docs has Office Live beat when it comes to collaboration, a key reason for the service's popularity. Where Office Live uses <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sharedviewteamblog/archive/2008/03/29/sharedview-1-0-has-released.aspx">SharedView</a> for screen sharing a document with another user in real-time, Google Docs allows multiple users to collaborate in real-time without the need for desktop software. Google's service can even alert you via email notifications when changes have been made. Microsoft's soon-to-arrive "<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_office_comes_to_browser.php">Office Web Applications</a>" may end up giving Google Docs a run for their money (especially considering <a href="http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/Microsoft-Office-Web-Applications-Your-Burning-Questions-Answered/">it will work on the iPhone</a>), but at the moment, Google Docs is the better choice for real-time collaboration.</p>

<h2>Why OffiSync?</h2>

<p>The only problem with Google Docs is that, in some people's opinion, it's <em>just not as good</em> as Microsoft Office software. Of course, that's an entirely subjective statement - you may or may not agree <em>(In fact, it's likely you don't, given that you're reading a blog about web apps and web technology)</em>. Still, there's a large user base of folks who launch Office every day instead of a browser, and it's for those people that OffiSync was designed. </p>

<h2>Test Drive</h2>

<p>Through a simple Office plugin, you're provided with a new menu seamlessly integrated into either your Microsoft Office 2003 or 2007 software.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/OffiSync_menu.png"></p>

<p>From the menu, you can open, save, search, email, and more, as you can see from the image above. In this case, "open" and "save" refers to opening and saving to and from Google Docs, not your PC.</p>

<p><strong><u>Saving Files</u></strong></p>

<p>Our one complaint involves the "Save" and "Save As" options. When we opened an Office document that was saved only on our PC, and went to upload it (save it) to Google Docs, neither "Save" nor "Save As" defaulted the title of the doc to what it was already named. Instead, it displayed "untitled." This is obviously only a minor issue, but one that becomes an annoyance if you use OffiSync to upload a lot of previously local-only files to the Google Docs service. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/offisync_-_untitled.png"></p>

<p><strong><u>Browsing &amp; Interacting with Google Docs</u></strong></p>

<p>Using either the Save or Open menu options, you'll be presented with a dialog box which has tabs for both browsing and searching your Google Docs. There's even a drop-down box that lets you switch between multiple Google accounts if necessary. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/officsync_open.png"></p>

<p>We were surprised that you could even interact with the Google Docs service from within this dialog box. For example, a right-click on any folder gave us options to create a new folder, delete the folder, or refresh. This was especially handy as we began to upload and organize our local stash of files. You can also drag-and-drop files from one folder to another. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/officsync_right_click_menu.png"></p>

<p><strong><u>Searching</u></strong></p>

<p>The search feature also worked really well, searching not only document titles, but also within the documents themselves. However, if you're looking for a document title using partial text, you'll need to use an asterisk (*) in order for the search feature to locate your file. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/offisync_search.png"></p>

<p><strong><u>Collaborating</u></strong></p>

<p>With the plugin, you can invite collaborators or modify their permissions. In a dialog box, you simply enter their email address, assign read or write permissions, then click "Save." You can then choose to write a short message and configure your notification options. It's just as easy as using the Google Docs service itself. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/offisync_collaborate.png"></p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/offisync_mail.png"></p>

<p>At the moment, in order to see real-time edits, you still have to use the Google Docs service in the browser. However, OffiSync creator, Oudi Antebi, is working on a feature that will let users see updates in real-time as two or more people open the file in Office. </p>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

<p>The <a href="http://offisync.com/">OffiSync</a> software is shaping up to become a must-have add-on for anyone who can't part with their Office installation but wants to enjoy the features of Google's cloud-based service. It may even provide some competition for the upcoming Office Web Applications...if OffiSync ever expands beyond Word, Excel and PowerPoint, that is. </p>

<p>Antebi plans to keep <a href="http://offisync.com/">OffiSync</a> free for consumers but charge for the enterprise version, which will be available later this year. It's hard to say if that's the right strategy - after all, we're consumers and we'd be willing to <em>pay</em> for this plugin - it's that good. But given Microsoft's plans to debut their own Office web apps later this year, Antebi may have no other choice but to keep it free for consumers in order to stay competitive. </p>

<p>We just hope that OffiSync doesn't end up with the same fate as that other Google Docs/local docs sync service DocSyncer - <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/10_web_apps_disappeared.php">they didn't make it</a>. But, we think there's a chance that OffiSync will be able to thrive where that service did not thanks to Antebi's plans to integrate even more Google Services (like Google Maps) into the software in the future. That alone, could give it a unique selling point that no one else provides. He also plans on making the search feature more robust, giving users smart filters to find the files based on metadata (names of collaborators, file type, size, location, etc.). That, too, will be a useful feature - especially as more and more of our documents are transitioned to Google's web-based service. </p>

<p>If you want to try OffiSync for yourself, you can. The <a href="http://offisync.com/download.html">download is now available for everyone</a> from the OffiSync web site. </p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aNW3R9HSxl4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aNW3R9HSxl4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/offisync_microsoft_office_plus_google_docs_is_the_perfect_app.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/offisync_microsoft_office_plus_google_docs_is_the_perfect_app.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/offisync_microsoft_office_plus_google_docs_is_the_perfect_app.php</guid>
         <category>Products</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:58:36 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Zoho Launches Gadgets</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/zoho_logo.jpg">Today, the web office company <a href="http://zoho.com">Zoho</a>, whose line of products competes with other web applications like Google Docs and Gmail as well as desktop-based suites like Microsoft Office, has launched a new product: <a href="http://gadgets.zoho.com/">Zoho Gadgets</a>. With these gadgets, data from Zoho applications can be integrated into Facebook, Gmail, iGoogle, Orkut and other online networks. Because the gadgets are built using the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSocial">OpenSocial</a> standard, they can be supported by any OpenSocial compatible network. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=14674&amp;cb=14674' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=14674&amp;n=14674' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[
<p>The <a href="http://gadgets.zoho.com/zc/index.do">new line of gadgets</a> delivers data from Zoho Docs, Zoho Mail, Zoho Calendar, Zoho Tasks, Zoho Contacts, and Zoho Planner. Going forward, Zoho plans to offer even more gadgets for their other applications. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/zoho_gadgets.jpg"></p>

<p>When adding the gadgets to iGoogle or Gmail, you won't have to enter in your Zoho account information in order to access your Zoho data. That's thanks to the oAuth support built in. In order to add a custom gadget to Gmail, you must first turn on a particular setting in labs which allows for this (Enable "Add any gadget by URL" in Labs). </p>

<p><em>Note: To learn more about custom Gmail gadgets, </em><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/five_fabulous_gmail_gadgets_you_wont_find_in_labs.php"><em>go here</em></a><em>. </em></p>

<p>In social networks like Facebook and Orkut, the gadgets function more like applications. Once you click the link on the <a href="http://gadgets.zoho.com/">Gadgets page</a> to add them to your profile, you'll be taken to a page where you'll need to enter in your account information before they will appear in your Applications list. </p>

<p>Finally, for OpenSocial compatible networks and applications, a link to an XML file is provided and for anywhere else you need a gadget, there's a generic embed code that can be used. </p>

<p>For anyone thinking of making the switch from Google Docs or Gmail over to the Zoho Suite, gadgets like these can make the transition easier as you'll be able to keep up with what's new even when you're still in your Google applications. And for those of us who spend entirely too much time in social networks, having these gadgets on hand means we won't miss out on the important information that matters most. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_launches_gadgets.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_launches_gadgets.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_launches_gadgets.php</guid>
         <category>Web Office</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:10:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Zoho Introduces Chat 2.0</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/zoho_chat.png"><a href="http://www.zoho.com">Zoho</a>, the web office company that competes with Google's online tools (<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_the_little_engine_that_could.php">and does so quite well</a>), has introduced a new feature to their online suite of productivity applications: <a href="http://chat.zoho.com/">Zoho Chat 2.0</a>. Built atop the original Zoho Chat platform, this iteration now integrates all the major instant messaging networks. But a multi-protocol IM client is not the big news - it's the fact that Zoho Chat 2.0 is integrated within the majority of the company's applications to allow for real-time collaboration with colleagues. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=14454&amp;cb=14454' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=14454&amp;n=14454' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[

<p>In Zoho Chat 2.0, you now have the ability to connect with others - both Zoho users and not - on IM networks like Yahoo!, Google Chat, MSN/Windows Live, AIM, ICQ, and any network that supports Jabber. The chat application itself can be launched from within nearly every Zoho online application with the exception of Creator, Share, Invoice, and Database &amp; Reports. But when you look at <a href="http://www.zoho.com/">the list of apps</a>, you can see there are far more that have chat than those that don't. The particular apps that lack this feature are also not generally the types of programs where much collaboration is needed...if any at all. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/zoho-chat.png"></p>

<p>The new <a href="http://chat.zoho.com">Zoho Chat 2.0</a> is no dumbed-down client. It offers most of the features that you have come to expect from your IM desktop applications. You can send files, record your chat history, customize your theme, and more - just like regular IM apps allow. It does a few cool tricks, too. For example, you can type in a new event in the chat bar at the bottom of Zoho Calendar to create a new appointment on the fly. In Zoho Meeting, you can launch desktop sharing with others from within the IM application. (Windows only for now.)</p>

<p>The chat tool is also able to send you notifications from activities that take place within Zoho itself, including document sharing notifications, unread chat messages and more - definitely a handy feature. Future releases for chat include plans to introduce even more IM networks, most notably Skype. </p>

<p>This release represents a major upgrade of the chat application in Zoho. Current Zoho users can try Chat 2.0 here as of today: <a href="http://chat.zoho.com">chat.zoho.com</a>.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_introduces_chat_20.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_introduces_chat_20.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_introduces_chat_20.php</guid>
         <category>Products</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 06:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Zoho Launches Writer 2.0: Looks More Like Word 2007</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="zoho_logo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/zoho_logo.jpg" />Zoho just <a href="http://blogs.zoho.com/general/zoho-writer-2-0-launches-with-fresh-look">released</a> version 2.0 of its <a href="http://writer.zoho.com">Zoho Writer </a>word processing application. While the company has added quite a few new and useful features in this release, the most obvious change is a new user interface which looks a lot like the 'Ribbon' in Microsoft Office. Thanks to this new user interface, the application now feels even more like a desktop application and has a far more professional and uncluttered look.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=14115&amp;cb=14115' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=14115&amp;n=14115' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>New Interface</h2>

<p>Clearly, this new interface, dubbed the MenuTab by Zoho, was inspired by Microsoft's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ribbon_(computing)">Ribbon interface</a>, which is slowly becoming the standard interface paradigm for Microsoft applications. Zoho smartly keeps the most often used functions like undo/redo, copy, cut, paste, and save outside of these tabs so that they are always available (something MS Office also does thanks to the <a href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/help/HA012341051033.aspx">Quick Access Toolbar</a>). In our tests, the MenuTab worked just as advertised, and if you are comfortable with the MS Office 2007 interface, you will feel right at home in the new Zoho Writer.</p>

<p><img alt="zoho_writer_20.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/zoho_writer_20.png"  /></p>

<p>Zoho plans to make the MenuTab the default interface for all of its productivity applications in the near future.</p>

<h2>New Features</h2>

<p>Zoho also added a few new features to Writer. Among these are improved auto-insert fields for dates and page numbers in the header and footer, a word and character count in the status bar, a LaTeX editor, and the ability to change your page layout to landscape mode. Collaborative editing is probably the most important new feature (and a necessary one, given that Google Docs has been <a href="http://docs.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=44680&amp;topic=15130">doing this</a> for a long time), but as <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10189002-2.html">Rafe Needleman</a> points out, it's too easy to overwrite another user's edits.</p>

<p><iframe style="border-bottom: #aabbcc 1px solid; border-left: #aabbcc 1px solid; border-top: #aabbcc 1px solid; border-right: #aabbcc 1px solid" height="350" src="http://show.zoho.com/embed?USER=writer&amp;IFRAME=yes&amp;DOC=Zoho%20Writer%20Tour" frameborder="0" width="450" name="Zoho%20Writer%20Tour" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_releases_new_version_of_writer.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_releases_new_version_of_writer.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_releases_new_version_of_writer.php</guid>
         <category>Products</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:13:22 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Frederic Lardinois</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Shutterborg, a New Online Word Processor</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/shutterborg_logo.png">Now that we have online office suites like <a href="http://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a>, <a href="http://zoho.com">Zoho</a>, and even Adobe's <a href="http://acrobat.com">Acrobat.com</a>, you may not have much desire to go and check out yet another would-be Microsoft Office killer. However, <a href="http://shutterb.org/">Shutterborg</a>, a new online word processor does one thing really well which makes it a unique tool in this space: it lets you open any URL on the internet and edit it like an Office document. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=13695&amp;cb=13695' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=13695&amp;n=13695' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[

<p>When you first visit Shutterborg, available online at <a href="http://shutterb.org">http://shutterb.org</a>, you're presented with three options: New Document, Open from Disk (coming soon), and Open from Web. The first option - starting a new document - will take you right into Shutterborg, where you can then begin to type. </p>

<p>The word processor itself is rather rudimentary. There are some basic options for formatting your text, aligning it, highlighting it, etc. You can also choose to insert photos and links from the "Insert" menu or create bulleted and numbered lists. Beyond that, the tool doesn't do much in terms of word processing. Also, at the moment, the files you create can only be saved in .HTML format. Other formats like .TXT, .ODT, and .DOC will arrive in later, <a href="http://twitter.com/wordprocessor/status/1174763341">says the company</a>. </p>

<p>If basic word processing was all that Shutterborg did, it probably wouldn't be worth a mention just yet. However, the "Open from Web" option that is presented to you upon launch is a pretty clever invention. Here, you can enter in any URL on the internet to open an exact replica of that web page, with the CSS and images intact. You can then edit it as you desire which could obviously lead to some humorous creations. </p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="shutterb_ex.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/shutterb_ex.png" width="599" height="402" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span>

<p>That feature alone makes <a href="http://shutterb.org/">Shutterborg</a> worth a look simply because it's so easy to use. Although the resulting HTML file won't look like much if opened outside of the Shutterborg processor, it's easy enough to grab a screenshot of your mocked up creation while you have Shutterborg open. The potential for creating hilarious edits to well-known sites will certainly appeal to the creative types out there. We can't wait to see what they come up with.&#160; </p>

<p>Shutterborg is a creation of <a href="http://developit.ca/">developIT</a>, a small business in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada whose focus is on developing web sites and Rich Internet Applications (RIAs) for businesses of all sizes. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/shutterborg_a_new_online_word_processor.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/shutterborg_a_new_online_word_processor.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/shutterborg_a_new_online_word_processor.php</guid>
         <category>Products</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 07:36:24 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Your Google Docs May Be Open to Hijacking</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/googledocs-logo.jpg">In July of this year, Google finally gave webmail users a way to make sure that Gmail always used SSL - the protocol that encrypts connections to prevent hijacking. Through a flip of switch in Gmail's settings, users could rest assured that their email was at least less vulnerable, <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=842">if not totally secure</a> from hackers. However, Gmail is not the only Google-based web application where you may be storing personal data. Your files stored in <a href="http://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a> should be protected, too. But are they? </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=13182&amp;cb=13182' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=13182&amp;n=13182' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Who Has Secure Docs?</h2>

<p>For many users of Google Docs, that answer is "no." According to <a href="http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=100181">Google's Help Topic on SSL</a> as well as their <a href="http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/business/editions.html">Google Apps Edition comparison guide</a>, <strong>SSL is a feature only made available to users of Google Apps Premier and Education Editions</strong>. However, in some informal testing on our part, it appears that users of Google Apps for Your Domain were given that option as well, despite the fact that their Google Apps edition clearly reads "Standard." For everyone else, though, Google Docs remains an unencrypted HTTP session. </p>

<p>In a business or educational setting where Google Docs is being used, your I.T. admin has probably turned on SSL for you by activating the feature that forces SSL sessions for all users. If they have not, though, you can still switch on SSL for yourself, says Google, but <a href="http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=100181">their help documentation</a> fails to explain how that can be done. All the documentation says is that <em>"your users can enable HTTPS when necessary." </em></p>

<p>What they probably mean is that anyone can type in <strong>"https"</strong> when entering in the URL for a Google Apps service in the address bar of their browser. Since your average internet user doesn't think about these sorts of things, though, that's probably not the best solution in terms of security. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/https_gmail.png"></p>

<p>While we hope that any I.T. admin in a corporate setting knows well enough how to enable a basic security feature such as this, it would still make us more comfortable if these sorts of things were enabled by default. The only reason to <em>not</em> enable SSL is because it can slow down your connection to Google services. Still, in the event of network issues, I.T. admins could temporarily disable this feature to speed up access for their users. But Google hasn't chosen to make security the default - they've chosen speed. </p>

<p>Outside of Google Apps, <strong>everyday users of Google Docs don't have an option in their Google Docs settings to force the service to always use SSL</strong>. Like those with a neglectful I.T. admin, these Docs users would have to remember to type in the "https" prefix if they want to use a secure connection. </p>

<h2>SSL Implemented Haphazardly</h2>

<p>Manually typing in "https" is all well and good, but let's face it - most users won't ever know to do this and those of us who do know won't remember. Not only is this process laborious, it's inefficient, too. For example, those who want to take advantage of the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_labs_offers_more_to_gma.php">Gmail Calendar and Docs widgets</a>, which allow for one-click access to other Google services from within Gmail, would have to forfeit a secure connection in order to do so. The only recourse would be to not use the widgets at all, and that certainly disrupts our workflow. </p>

<p>However, if you've enabled SSL within your Gmail settings, connections to your other Google services will also be encrypted if you use the navigation bar at the top left of your Gmail...but <em>only</em> if you use the navigation bar. Even when signed into your Google account, typing in "docs.google.com," "calendar.google.com," or using the Gmail widgets will still take you to the HTTP site. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/gmail_nav_bar.png"></p>


<h2>At Least They Have SSL...</h2>

<p>What's really unfortunate about this potential security issue is the fact that Google is actually<em> leading the way</em> among webmail and web app providers when it comes to offering SSL to its users. Although other free webmail services from Yahoo, Microsoft, and AOL, for example, may authenticate you upon login via HTTPS, they drop down to unencrypted mode immediately after the authentication is completed. </p>

<p>However, it could be argued that those other services are not claiming to be a secure replacements for business use. Since Google promotes Apps as a web-based alternative to expensive desktop software, many people mistakenly assume that means Google services are, in general, "pretty much" secure for personal use, too. Apparently, that's only true to a point. </p>

<p>It's also worth pointing out that nothing, not even SSL, can keep a determined hacker out of your account. As <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=842">ZDNet reported</a> at the beginning of the year, even SSL can't keep blackhats from hijacking your session through the use of "<a href="http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-sidejacking.html">sidejacking</a>," a trick that enables hackers to take control of any Web 2.0 app that relies on saved cookie information. <em>(There have also been <a href="http://www.smime.at/blog/2008/12/17/google-docs-serious-security-flaw/">other reports</a> of Google Docs security issues, but we couldn't reproduce the problem.)</em></p>

<p>Providing SSL to <em>everyone</em> is the least Google could do. And to the other webmail/web app providers out there: it's time you followed suit. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/your_google_docs_may_be_open_to_hijacking.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/your_google_docs_may_be_open_to_hijacking.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/your_google_docs_may_be_open_to_hijacking.php</guid>
         <category>Trends</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:44:17 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Microsoft Office Comes to the Browser (Finally)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/officelive-logo.jpg" />Microsoft announced this morning at its PDC conference that the next release of Microsoft Office will include browser-based versions of some of its main office software products - Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote. These will be &quot;lightweight versions&quot;, but Microsoft told us yesterday that they'll still have rich functionality and will be comparable to Google's suite of online office applications. <font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/microsoft/Microsoft_Office_Comes_to_the_Browser_Finally';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>The apps will enable users to create, edit and collaborate on Microsoft Office documents through the browser. The apps will work in IE, Firefox and Safari browsers (no word on whether Google Chrome will be supported). <b>Update:</b> Microsoft clarified in an email that these apps will use HTML and AJAX, but <em>also</em> Silverlight components.</p>
]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=12310&amp;cb=12310' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=12310&amp;n=12310' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p><b>Update 2:</b> For a contrary view on use of Silverlight, see <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_office_comes_to_browser.php#comment-115254">Matthew Holloway's comment</a> below (comment #19), in which he says that "SilverLight apps on OSX and Linux are typically second-class citizens to SilverLight on Windows."</p>

<p>The online versions will share the same names as their desktop counterparts (Word, Excel, etc), although unfortunately they don't fully escape the awkward and confusing branding that Microsoft gives to most of its Internet apps. The collective name for these apps is &quot;Office Web Applications&quot;. To remind you, there is also an <a href="http://office.microsoft.com/">Office Online</a> (a separate Microsoft site where users can download templates) and an <a href="http://workspace.officelive.com/">Office Live Workspace</a> (for sharing office files between desktop and Web - <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/workspace_preview.php">our coverage</a>). </p>
<p>The &quot;Office Web applications&quot; will be available to consumers through Office Live, a service which has both ad-funded and subscription options. Business users will be offered Office Web applications as a hosted subscription service and  through existing &quot;volume licensing agreements&quot;. There will be a private technology preview of the Office Web applications later this year.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/weboffice/ms_vs_google.jpg" align="right" />Last month we ran a poll asking which word processing tool you primarily use. We got over 2,600 separate votes and a resounding 49% of people still use Microsoft Word as their main word processing tool. Its open source desktop equivalent OpenOffice got 16%. Google Docs was the best placed Web Office app, with 15%. </p>
<p>The results showed that there is still a big place for desktop Office apps. Nevertheless, with the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/windows_azure.php">announcement yesterday of Microsoft Azure</a> - a so-called <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_azure_redefine_os.php">cloud computing OS</a> - Microsoft is clearly serving a growing demand for browser-based office software. We expect these apps to become more full featured over time.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3145/2980594510_4c36c5fa0d_o.png" width="610" border="0" /></p>
<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3159/2980594456_fedd5104de_o.png" width="610" border="0" /></p>
<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3251/2980594398_b0808ac20f_o.png" width="610" border="0" /></p>
<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3282/2979738713_5a53868fde_o.png" width="610" border="0" /></p>
]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_office_comes_to_browser.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_office_comes_to_browser.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_office_comes_to_browser.php</guid>
         <category>Microsoft</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Businesses Can&apos;t Hide From 2.0: A Look At 2.0&apos;s Impact Across Industries</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/20.png">If you were interviewing someone for a position with your company and they admitted that they didn't know anything about the new trends and innovations taking place in their field, what would you think? Likely, what you would think is "next candidate, please." In today's business world, job-seekers are expected to stay current with the happenings taking place in their area of interest. There was a time when those happenings were very much job-specific and anything having to do with technology fell squarely on the shoulders of I.T. That time has passed. Web 2.0 technologies lifted the veil of mystery surrounding computing technology and made it accessible to everyone. Today, if you're not staying current with Web 2.0 technologies' impact on business, then you're just not staying current. Period. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7181&amp;cb=7181' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7181&amp;n=7181' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Web 2.0 Is Everywhere</h2>

<p>No matter which department you're in, Web 2.0 technologies have had an impact. If you've been ignoring their prevalence and adoption, you're at risk of falling behind in your career and your business is at risk of losing ground to its competitors who are tuned into this trend. </p>

<p>Here at ReadWriteWeb, we deliver news about Web 2.0's impact on business in addition to news about web technologies in general. Depending on your area of interest, you can find a lot of great information on this subject in our archives. Or simply bookmark this post for easy reference. </p>

<h2>Document Collaboration Suites</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/groupswim_logo.jpg" align="left"><a href="http://groupswim.com/">GroupSwim</a> is an innovative company which has created an intelligent community building and collaboration SaaS solution. They aim to connect individuals and build knowledge utilizing social based methodologies. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupswim_saas_collaboration.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/dreamfactory.gif" align="left"><a href="http://www.dreamfactory.com/">DreamFactory's</a> suite of Enterprise 2.0 applications consists of a Project Management module, a Time and Expense Module, a Document Manager, and a Team Calendar. Originally, the company was available on Amazon Web Services, but now DreamFactory's software will be available on Intuit's <a href="http://quickbase.intuit.com/">QuickBase</a> platform, too. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/dreamfactorys_collaboration_suite_now_on_quickbase.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2345/2248193471_e181841039_o.jpg" align="left"><a href="http://box.net/">Box.net</a> offers collaboration functionality which allows any Box.net user can invite collaborators to any folder in their account. The collaboration feature is also fully compatible with all the OpenBox services, which extends online collaboration beyond just word processor documents, spreadsheets, and presentations, similar to what Google Docs currently offers. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/boxnet_adds_collaboration_take.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img height="100" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/groupware_nov06.jpg" width="496"></p>

<p>The term <strong><em>groupware</em></strong> refers to applications that facilitate real-time communication, coordination and collaboration amongst groups of people. A number of startups are working hard to develop the nascent groupware market, so in this post we identify some of those startups and provide an overview of where the market is heading...<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_primer.php">read more</a>.</p>

<h2>What's the Deal With Wikis?</h2>
<br>

<p><img alt="wikibus.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/wikibus.jpg" align="left">Only a handful of years ago, it was common to hear people laugh at <a href="http://wikipedia.org">Wikipedia</a>. Anyone can edit it! How could you take it seriously? These days, just as blogs are, wikis are on their way to winning a reputation as serious publishing platforms. Wikis are now serious business. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wiki_business.php">Read more</a>.</p>
<br><br>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/atlassian_logo_oct07.png" align="left"><a href="http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/">Atlassian Confluence</a>, makers of one of the most popular enterprise wiki solutions, offers Microsoft Office and SharePoint integration in their release of the Confluence 2.9 software. With these new tools, users no longer have to know the technicalities of wiki markup or even how to use the included rich-text WYSIWYG editor in order to make changes to the wiki - they can simply open up a Microsoft Office document instead. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wiki_editing_just_got_easier_atlassian_confluence_office_connector.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img height="104" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/Wiki_wetpaint.gif" width="164" align="left"><a href="http://www.wetpaint.com">WetPaint</a>, a popular hosted Wiki solution, provides person-to-person and private messaging between users of their Wiki network. This means that Wetpaint Wiki users can now send single or multi-person private messages, to connect and collaborate with others about their interests. This post introduces wikis and discusees <em>who</em> is using them and for <em>what purpose</em>.First, wikis are described and then the range of wiki products in the market right now is explored. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_world_of_wikis.php">Read more</a>.</p>


<p><img alt="editb2.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/editb2.jpg" align="left"> Leave it to people in the wiki market to know how to collaborate. Nearly 20 different wiki providers have teamed up to offer a new Firefox extension that will <a href="http://universaleditbutton.org/Universal_Edit_Button">notify users whenever they are on a page that is publicly editable</a>, using a standard icon that sits in the same place the RSS autodiscovery icon appears. Clicking on the icon (img. on the left) will take you to that page's editing interface. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wiki_universal_edit_button.php">Read more</a>.</p>
<br><br><br>

<h2>What's Office 2.0?</h2>
<br>

<p><img height="170"  src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/online-office_aug07.jpg" width="215" align="left"> Web Office Defined: A Web Office suite is a combination of productivity, publishing and collaboration features. A Web Office both embraces the functionality of desktop office suites (e.g. Microsoft Office) and extends it by using Web Native features. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_office_defined.php">Read more</a>.</p>
<br><br><br>

<p><img height="149" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/typing-laptop.jpg" width="200" align="left"> The State of Office 2.0: Over the past 10 years, Corel, Sun, IBM and others have tried to compete with Microsoft in the office software business, but thus far none of them have been able to take a significant chunk of Microsoft's large market share, which generates revenues exceeding $15 billion each year. These companies have tried everything; including Sun open sourcing their StarOffice suite and releasing it as the free <a href="http://openoffice.org">OpenOffice</a>. Yet, even this very compelling move has not been able to make a serious dent in the market. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_state_of_office_20.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/weboffice/ms_vs_google.jpg" align="left"><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/mar08/03-03OLBetaWorldwidePR.mspx">Microsoft announced</a> their Office Live Workspace is publicly available for everyone to access. The site, a free web-based extension of Microsoft Office, lets you access your documents online and share your work with others. Some say that the service's launch is a direct response to Google's entry into the web office space with their Google Docs online service. If that's so, then the question now is: did Microsoft just trump Google Docs? Or does Google Docs still rule online office suites? <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/office_live_workspace_vs_google_docs_feature_by_feature.php">Read more</a>. </p>


<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/web_office_june07.png" align="left">The Web Office was a market that underwent a lot of changes in 2007. Our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_office_defined.php">definition of Web Office</a> is: A Web Office suite is a combination of productivity, publishing and collaboration features. A Web Office both embraces the functionality of desktop office suites (e.g. Microsoft Office) and extends it by using Web Native features. The 2007 year in review: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_office_2007_year_in_review.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/ms_goog2.jpg" width="250" align="left">This is the perspective of a "skeptical, later early adopter"; the sort of person who Microsoft needs to retain and should have been able to retain easily. I don't spend time on productivity tools that may at some date make me more productive, but which today are just a frustrating time sink. That describes the majority of people. MS Office can be annoying, but it does work. So any serious alternative has to offer a significant advantage and at the same time make adoption a total breeze. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_apps_serious_threat_to_microsoft_office.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img height="63" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/EditGridLogo.gif" width="255" align="left"><a href="http://www.editgrid.com/">EditGrid</a>, the main product of HongKong-based company Team and Concepts (TnC) Ltd., is a leading Web 2.0 online spreadsheet service that focuses on online collaboration and interoperability. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/editgrid_online_spreadsheet.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/expresso_logo.png" align="left"><a href="http://www.expressocorp.com/">eXpresso</a> was named as one of PC World's <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,140663-c,technology/article.html">25 Most Innovative Products of the Year</a> for 2007. PC World succinctly summed the product up: &quot;[it] allows Excel users to share their spreadsheets, online or off.&quot; eXpresso is different from the web office contenders that you normally hear about on ReadWriteWeb for three reasons...<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/expresso_web_office.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img height="64" src="http://static.flickr.com/72/226909140_d3daf0dab3.jpg?v=0" width="180" align="left"> <a href="http://zimbra.com">Zimbra </a>is looking to expand its platform to the iPhone. Recently they announced Zimbra Mobile for iPhone 2.0. Zimbra Mobile for iPhone 2.0 will allow iPhone users over-the-air two-way synchronization of e-mails, calendar, contacts, and photos between user mailboxes and mobile devices, and seamless &quot;push&quot; e-mail service for all Zimbra Collaboration Suite users. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zimbra_mobile_for_the_iphone_2_0.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p> News from the <a href="http://office20.com/">Office 2.0 conference</a> in San Francisco, 2008. Read <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/office_20_day_1_recap.php">more</a>.</p>

<h2>What's Happening in the Enterprise 2.0 Space?</h2>
<br>

<p><img height="65" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/cloud.jpg" width="75" align="left">A <a href="http://www.forrester.com/go?docid=43850">report</a> released by <a href="http://www.forrester.com">Forrester Research</a> is predicting that enterprise spending on Web 2.0 technologies is going to increase dramatically over the next five years. This increase will include more spending on social networking tools, mashups, and RSS, with the end result being a <strong>global enterprise market of $4.6 billion by the year 2013</strong>. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img height="65" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/socialsite-logos.jpg" width="75" align="left"> Enterprise 2.0 is Happening: If you're a business who has been ignoring the Web 2.0 trend and the spread of social media: look out, the tide is shifting and you're about to be left behind. The rise of social media didn't happen overnight, the power of the internet to unite people, the ubiquity of broadband, the rise of Gen Y, the development of new technologies for socializing on the web - all of these things and more have led to the rise of social media. And this new force is affecting change in the way that companies do business - now and for many years to come.</p>

<p><img height="75" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/rww_enterprise.jpg" width="75" align="left"> The break-up of behemoth, vertically integrated enterprises commenced in the 1970's, got a boost from junk bond financing in the 1980's, and accelerated in the 1990's with globalization. Now, late in the 2000's, Social Media (aka Web 2.0) is adding another gear that will accelerate the fundamental restructuring of the enterprise. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_nature_of_the_firm.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/enterprise20b.jpg" align="left"> Most enterprise software sucks. That is my considered opinion from 30 years in the software biz. Words that come to mind are: bloated, inflexible and user hostile. The good news is that it is <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sharepoint_to_run_enterprise_2.php">getting better</a>, a lot better. The driver for change is what I call the consumerization of enterprise software. These new software champions typically have some if not all of these 8 main attributes...<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise20_wave.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/enterprise_20.png" align="left">The <a href="http://launchpad.enterprise2conf.com/">Enterprise 2.0 Launch Pad program</a> is a program that allows companies to showcase their products and compete for the opportunity to present their ideas to the community at this year's <a href="http://www.enterprise2conf.com/">Enterprise 2.0 Conference</a>. This competition, organized by <a href="http://www.stoweboyd.com/">Stowe Boyd</a>, began in April when companies were invited to post their video pitches to the E2 web site. After the community voted, the list of contenders was narrowed down to five finalists who will now compete for the final spot. For that grand prize winner, the prize is free exhibit space at the upcoming conference. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_launchpad_finalists.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/enterprise_20/sharepoint.png" align="left"> SharePoint to run Enterprise 2.0? 9 companies are saying &quot;yes,&quot; having recently launched Enterprise 2.0 offerings that integrate with SharePoint technology. If there's one thing that any I.T. pro knows it's the value of &quot;maximizing their investment&quot; in whatever servers they run, technology they use, or services they've signed up for. With strict budgets in place, no I.T. purchases are bought on a whim. Instead, each decision is researched, tested, thoughtfully considered, and, if worthy, purchased, then rolled out to become a part of the I.T. infrastructure. SharePoint is no exception. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sharepoint_to_run_enterprise_2.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<h2>Is 2.0 Affecting My Industry?</h2>
<p>
Yes! Check out the examples below of Web 2.0's impact on various industries and fields.</p>

<h2>Finance/Banking</h2>
<br>

<p><img alt="googfinancelogo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/googfinancelogo.jpg" width="150" align="left">Google is <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/at-long-last-real-time-stock-quotes-are.html">announced</a> that after more than a year of work on the problem, Google Finance is now offering real-time price quotes for any stock traded on NASDAQ. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_finance_and_the_real_time_web.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img alt="Strands" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/Picture%20394.png" width="150" align="left"> <a href="http://strands.com">Strands</a>, the recommendation and lifestreaming service we've written about here before, <a href="http://blog.strands.com/2008/07/16/bbva-strands-personal-finance/">announced a much anticipated deal</a> that will put it in the driver's seat for financial recommendations served up to millions of online banking customers around the world. The company's recommendation test-case in music is no longer all they will be known for around the world. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/strands_brings_recommendation.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img height="80" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/iphone-bank.jpg" width="150" align="left"> We <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/survey_48_of_bank_customers_wa.php">reported on a survey</a> that revealed that 48% of online banking customers between the ages of 18 and 34 would be interested in using &quot;secure gadgets for personal banking&quot; if their bank offered them. More than a quarter of bank customers would consider switching to another bank if it took better advantage of web 2.0 technologies. While that survey was flawed in some ways, there is another access point to banking information that customer may want more than secure widgets: mobile. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mobile_banking_on_the_rise.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/worklight_logo.png" align="left"> 48% of Bank Customers Want Web 2.0 Gadgets. <a href="http://myworklight.com/">WorkLight</a>, a startup that offers enterprise 2.0 products, recently did a survey among Facebook users to find out their willingness to use Web 2.0 tools for secure banking. The survey was conducted among 1000 Facebook users between the ages of 18-34. The fact that the survey was conducted among Facebook users gives it a bias towards tech-savvy people. However there are some surprising findings. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/survey_48_of_bank_customers_wa.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<h2>Accounting</strong></h2>
<br>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/online_accounting.jpg" align="left">Online Accounting: State of the Market: Accounting software for small business and personal use is increasingly moving from the desktop to online. However, compared to other office software, this transition to online has been relatively slow. Partly that's due to user reticence: writing a document online and sharing it with others (via Google Docs, Office Live, Zoho, or whatever you use) is one thing. Entering sensitive financial information into your browser is harder to adjust to. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/online_accounting_state_of_the_market.php">Read more</a>.</p>
<br><br>

<h2>Project Management</strong></h2>
<br>

<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2288/2261159438_11aac37dc4_o.jpg" align="left">Add this one to your web office toolkit - <a href="http://www.liquidplanner.com">LiquidPlanner</a> is an online, hosted project management tool that lets you access and update projects anywhere you have an internet connection. The service offers you and your team a complete project environment, social networking and collaboration features, and a probabilistic scheduling engine which tells you the probability of completing each task - and ultimately the entire project - by a certain date. With everything organized into a centralized dashboard that can be customized for each team member, everyone on your team can stay focused on their tasks and how they relate to the project as a whole. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/liquidplanner_offers_online_pr.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/weboffice/clarizen_logo.png" align="left"> The Clarizen project management software came out of stealth mode last year and has now just launched a new version with additional features. The latest version, Clarizen v 2.0, will be demoed at the &quot;<a href="http://www.undertheradarblog.com/">Under the Radar Conference</a>,&quot; an event held on Microsoft's campus whose current theme is &quot;The Business of Web Apps: Where the Web Goes to Work.&quot; <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web-enable_microsoft_project_with_clarizen.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/jc_logo.jpg" align="left">Enterprise 2.0 is a <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php">rapidly growing trend</a> that takes the concepts and tools of social media <em>(social networking, RSS, wikis, blogs, etc.)</em> and re-purposes them for business use, wrapping them up into applications that make the tools at work seem more like the tools we use in our day-to-day lives. While these enterprise 2.0 apps give us that web 2.0 feel, it's rarer to see actual Web 2.0 services like <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/social_tools_go_to_work_in_the_enterprise.php">Facebook or Twitter used by businesses</a>. And although we've seen many people <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/blogspotting/archives/2008/04/creative_busine.html?campaign_id=rss_blog_blogspotting">promoting the business use of Twitter</a>, we had not yet heard about anyone actually going so far as to integrate Twitter into a non-consumer focused application. However, that's just what <a href="http://www.jointcontact.com">Joint Contact</a> has done. Their PM tool now shows how tweeting can actually be a productive activity. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/joint_contact_first_business_tool_to_integrate_twitter.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img height="77"  src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/backpack-logo.jpg" width="88" align="left">37Signals offers a range of applications, from simple, single-function apps like Ta-Da Lists (to-do lists), Writeboard (collaborative word processor), and Campfire (group chat) to more complicated apps like Basecamp (project management) and Highrise (group contact manager). <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/37signals_backpack_losing_focus.php">Read more</a>.</p>


<h2>Health</strong></h2>
<br>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/health20_best.jpg" align="left">Health 2.0, web-based apps and services for the healthcare sector, is a nascent but potentially huge market for web 2.0. As of now, many of these apps have an emphasis on communication, information sharing and community. These are relatively easy things to address using Web tools. However we're starting to see health 2.0 apps try to tackle the enormous inefficiencies in the healthcare system - check out our description of Carol.com below. Also, in the longer term, we will see the Web being used in medical diagnosis and practice. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_health_20_web_apps.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/health20_conf_logo.jpg" align="left"> The <a href="http://www.health2con.com/sandiego.html">Health 2.0 Conference</a> is reviewed here and some of the health web apps that caught our eye as well as trends that are discussed. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/health_20_apps_trends_to_watch.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google_health_logo_may08.jpg" align="left">Google <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/peek-into-our-search-factory.html">announced</a> the public availability of <a href="http://www.google.com/health">Google Health</a>, after initially launching as a <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_health_pilot_program.php">closed beta back in February</a>. It is described as &quot;a safe and secure way to collect, store, and manage [your] medical records and health information online&quot; and is being positioned as a way for users to control their own medical records. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_health_launches_public_beta.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<h2>HR</strong></h2>
<br>

<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2258/2263976068_14bb940463_o.jpg" align="left">Traditional resumes are boring. They become stale and out-of-date, they can't really showcase your work or achievements, and they end up just sitting in the bottom of someone's inbox. A paper resume, while professional, doesn't really let an employer get to know you. Many sites are trying to solve the problems of traditional resumes by providing job seekers a new way to stand out in the crowd. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_resume_rebooted_a_look_at_web_enabled_job_hunting.php">Read more</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/linkedin_app.png" align="left">The iPhone has been making headway in its battle to become a business-ready tool. Obviously, the addition of Microsoft Exchange support was a big step towards being considered a viable alternative to the traditional smartphones used at work, like Blackberry and Windows Mobile. However, beyond simply supporting enterprise email, the iPhone platform has a lot of potential to cater to the needs of its business users, too. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/linkedin_a_new_must-have_app_for_iphone.php">Read more</a>.

  <p><img hspace="5" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/linkedin_logo.gif" align="left"> LinkedIn has an audience that is both <strong>younger</strong> (41 vs 48) and <strong>richer</strong> ($106k vs $98K). LinkedIn was also naturally crowing about their growth (189% for year ending Oct. '07) and the chart from <a href="http://cache.valleywag.com/assets/resources/2007/11/LinkedInstats.jpg">Nielsen</a> which shows comparative Facebook growth at 125%. Note that Facebook growth is from a higher base and the law of large numbers applies, but Facebook has always crowed about their growth rates vs the larger MySpace, so they have to live with growth rate comparisons to LinkedIn now. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/linkedin_young_rich_demographic.php">Read more</a>.</p>

 <h2>Marketing</strong></h2>
<br>

  <p><img height="96" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/anger2.jpg" width="96" align="left">Viral marketing, user-generated content, online buzz: over the past few years, these terms have been representative of a new way of marketing to consumers that takes advantage of the current popularity of the social web. This new technique involves companies encouraging its customers to create content of their own in order to generate interest in the company's brand. Unfortunately, one of the potential side effects of this strategy is the potential for negative buzz. Despite this fact, a surprisingly low percentage of marketers are monitoring for negative responses. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/when_user-generated_content_goes_bad.php">Read more</a>.</p>

  <p><img height="56" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/kiva_logo.png" width="105" align="left"> Using the new pilot program from a company called <a href="http://www.involver.com/">Involver</a>, <a href="http://www.kiva.org/">Kiva</a> launched <a href="http://apps.facebook.com/kivavideo/campaigns/player/446?campaign=446&amp;ref_tag=facebook_apps%2Fad_landing%2Fad_landing">a video campaign on Facebook</a> to draw users to their site to lend directly to these developing nations. The video even features a button that appears at the end of the video encouraging you to &quot;lend&quot; money. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kiva_launches_facebook_campaign.php">Read more</a>.</p>

  <p><img height="76" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/mobile/textbound.png" width="65" align="left">Mobile marketing startup, <a href="http://www.textbound.com/">TextBound</a>, has big plans to make text messages the new mass media for advertisers. Like we mentioned earlier, more and more companies are going to be <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/location_based_mobile_ads.php">betting on location based mobile ads</a> this year, and TextBound hopes to capitalize on this trend. But unlike mobile social network/marketing vehicle, <a href="https://www.fluc.com/Welcome/">Fluc</a>, TextBound isn't about connecting with your friends, it's about delivering ads to your cell phone via text message, then taking you to the mobile web for more details. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/textbound_heralds_mobile_marketings_arrival.php">Read more</a>.</p>

  <p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/hivelive.png" align="left">Recently, HiveLive announced a new partnership with <a href="http://www.responsys.com/">Responsys</a>, a marketing firm whose client list includes some big-name brands like Apple and Salesforce.com. Enterprise 2.0 is sure to follow. What Responsys offers their customers are on-demand email and marketing solutions that can be anything from web sites to email to mobile. With the new partnership with <a href="http://www.hivelive.com">HiveLive</a>, they can expand that offering to include enterprise social networks. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/hivelive_partners_with_marketer_responsys.php">Read more.</a></p>

  <p><img height="45"  src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/clearspring-logo.jpg" width="150" align="left">Widget platform <a href="http://www.clearspring.com/">Clearspring</a> has an ad network that will allow widget publishers to monetize their widgets with advertising. The ads run inside widgets and come in a variety of formats. Clearspring has already inked deals with some of their largest widget publishers to run ads, including the NHL, 20th Century Fox, Lionsgate Films, Blockbuster, and Virgin Mobile. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/clearspring_launches_widget_ad_network.php">Read more</a>.</p></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/businesses_cant_hide_from_20.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/businesses_cant_hide_from_20.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/businesses_cant_hide_from_20.php</guid>
         <category>Trends</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Sarah Perez</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Word Processing: Most of You Still Use Desktop Software</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/weboffice/ms_vs_google.jpg" />This week we ran a poll asking which word processing tool you primarily use. We wanted to see if things had changed much since we ran the same poll <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_what_tool_do_you_use_for_word_processing.php">one year ago</a>.</p>
<p>So are ReadWriteWeb readers, many of whom are  early adopters of Internet technology, using <em>online</em> word processing services now instead of desktop software? Er, no.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7173&amp;cb=7173' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7173&amp;n=7173' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>As at time of writing, over 1,500 people had voted. 48% of those still use Microsoft Word as their main word processing tool. Its open source desktop equivalent OpenOffice got 15%. However, there is good news for Web Office fans - Google Docs was in second place with 17%. This is a 6% increase from last year according to our polls.</p>
<h2>Less Than 1/4 of You Use an Online Word Processer as Your Main Tool</h2>
<p>Let's delve further into the results, firstly for the desktop software. Last year MS Word got 46% and this year 48%. So not much has changed for the dominant office software supplier, even with RWW's Net savvy readers. OpenOffice slipped a bit, down from 17% last year to 15% this year. Overall, <strong>76% of readers still use a desktop software program</strong> as their main word processing tool (counting the 8% who use a text editor for this purpose). That's up slightly from 74% the same time last year.</p>
<p>That means that <strong>less than 25% of our readers use an online service</strong> as their primary means of doing word processing. The best of the online breed was Google Docs, with 17%, up from 11%. This is a good sign though, because Google Docs is now second behind only MS Word.</p>
<h2>Google Docs Gains Users, But Not From Microsoft</h2>
<p>What was a little surprising is that the Web startups competing with Google Docs all performed worse than last year. ThinkFree got 2%, Buzzword 1%, Zoho 1%, and Zimbra less than 1%. ThinkFree and Zoho both polled at 5% last year and Zimbra 2% (Buzzword wasn't in last year's poll). This indicates that Google Docs has gained users <em><strong>not from MS Word</strong></em>... but from the online startups. </p>
<p>Tell us your reaction to these results. What's happened to the startups? Are they doomed in this market dominated by the big guns?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/895296.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/895296/" >Which tool do you mostly use for word processing?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/word_processing_poll_results_2008.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/word_processing_poll_results_2008.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/word_processing_poll_results_2008.php</guid>
         <category>Polls</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Google Video for Business Launches: YouTube for Enterprise</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/googleapps_feb07.gif" />Today Google is launching a new product for the enterprise market, Google Video for business. It's a new application in the Google Apps office suite, enabling workers to upload and share videos inside their organizations. Videos can be shared on an individual, group or company-wide basis. Google sees it being used for such things as executive communications, product training, trip reports, &quot;social videos&quot; for the company intranet. </p>
<p>We think this has the potential to break open the Web Office market, because up till now nobody has done rich media for the enterprise as an easy to use browser-based package. Google Video for Business manages to do this, mostly because of YouTube's influence.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7138&amp;cb=7138' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7138&amp;n=7138' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>Google Video for business is now available as part of Google Apps Premier Edition at no additional cost (the suite itself costs $50/user/year). Each Google Apps Premier Edition domain gets 3GB of Video storage per user account, with a file limit of 300 MB per video. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/googleapps_platform2_sep08.jpg" /></p>
<p>Matt Glotzbach, Product Management Director of Google Enterprise, described Google Video for Business to us as &quot;a whole new way of working&quot;. He claimed that rich media will be incorporated into traditional email-based business communication like never before. Google sees collaboration as &quot;the 'soul' of Google Apps&quot; and video as the next big step in rich collaboration. Cloud computing, said Glotzbach, is what makes this possible.</p>
<h2>How it Works: The YouTube Factor</h2>
<p>Google Video for business unsurprisingly has many aspects of YouTube in it. You can easily upload videos, add descriptions and tags, share videos with the click of a button, and embed them in Google Sites and other internal webpages. You can also embed videos as 'gadgets' (aka widgets) in any site that accepts Google Gadgets - e.g. Google Spreadsheets. The gadgets have the same security as web pages, meaning that only authorized users can view it no matter where it is embedded.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/googvideobiz5.jpg" /></p>
<p>Other features borrowed from YouTube include search (of course, but in this case only for videos to which users have access), ability to view high-quality video, ratings, comments and additional tags, ability to download videos for viewing offline or on portable devices.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/googvideobiz6.jpg" /></p>
<p>Google Video for business uses the same infrastructure that powers YouTube. In our call Google noted that YouTube currently has 13hrs of video uploaded per minute! It streams hundreds of millions videos per day. So obviously this infrastructure is robust and can easily add a few more enterprise videos to the mix. </p>
<p>The one big difference though between Google Video for business and YouTube, is security. In the enterprise, security is a key feature.</p>
<h2>Google Apps Ramping Up</h2>
<p>As indicated by <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_word_processing_tools.php">this week's ReadWriteWeb poll</a>, where right now 21% of respondants  say they use Google Docs as their main word processing tool (up from 11% the same time last year), Google Apps is exhibiting strong growth and increasing acceptance as an office suite. Google itself says that more than 500,000 businesses use Google Apps, with more than 3,000 businesses signing up every day. It says Apps has more than 10 million active users and &quot;hundreds of thousands&quot; of paid users.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/a">Google Apps</a>  includes Gmail, Google Talk (instant messaging), Google Calendar, Google Docs, Google Sites, Start Page for creating a customizable homepage, and now Google Video for business.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/googleapps_platform_sep08.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> as well as for enterprise, Google says that a version for Google Apps Education Edition customers that allows faculty and staff to upload and share videos with students will be available on September 8 for free trial until March 9, 2009, at which point it will cost $10 per user, per year.</p>
<h2>Google Apps vs SharePoint</h2>
<p>When <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_sites_the_next_sharepoint_maybe_notwhy_google_apps_could_lose_the_enterprise_market.php">Google Sites launched</a> at the end of February, we threw some cold water on the claim that Google Sites would compete with Microsoft SharePoint. ReadWriteWeb's Sarah Perez wrote that &quot;for the small to medium size business, you could say that Google makes a strong offering as a more affordable alternative to Microsoft Servers and applications. However, it's a big jump from offering tools to a mom-and-pop as compared with a global, Fortune 500 company&quot;.</p>
<p>But with Google Video for business, Google has taken another step towards tackling the big enterprise market. It may well be a significant step, because with the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise20_wave.php">consumerization of the enterprise</a> these large organizations are getting used to using tools such as YouTube.</p>
<p>Indeed perhaps this YouTube video was one of the inspirations for the Google Video for business team ;-)</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8P9QlojtrWs&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8P9QlojtrWs&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<h2>Competitive Landscape for Enterprise Video: Microsoft, Adobe, Veodia</h2>
<p>Google says that there are video solutions for enterprises out there, but that they are &quot;too complex and expensive for all but the largest enterprises&quot;. They also claim that competing products require proprietary hardware and software, and are difficult to maintain and use. No specific names were mentioned, but <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/91747-the-gloves-are-off-adobe-targets-microsoft-s-enterprise-video-market-lead?source=feed">a recent article by Dan Rayburn</a> explains how Microsoft and Adobe are both active in video solutions for enterprise:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>&quot;Historically, Microsoft's (MSFT) Windows Media technologies have always dominated the enterprise market for multiple reasons, the biggest being that the WM Player was bundled into the OS and the server is cheap to deploy. And while I think Microsoft still has the majority share of the enterprise market, Adobe (ADBE) continues to get more aggressive in targeting IT decision makers inside enterprise organizations.</p>
  <p>With Adobe making the licensing costs for FMS3 a lot cheaper than they use to be, and the fact that live Flash is now considered stable in FMS3, I am beginning to hear from more enterprise customers who are now evaluating Flash.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We mentioned SharePoint above, which allows people to upload video - but there's not much else video functionality. Microsoft also has <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_RoundTable">RoundTable</a>, a video-conferencing solution,  as well as Live Meeting and Office Communications Server (which does video).</p>
<p>So clearly Google Video for Business targets both Microsoft and Adobe, as well as other big vendors such as Cisco. Google's solution does appear to be much easier to use, just like YouTube was/is for consumers. Note however that it is not a live video solution, so it can't be used for video conferencing.</p>
<p>Google  told us that an early stage startup called <a href="http://veodia.com">Veodia</a> is the only startup they're aware of doing SaaS video for businesses. We looked at <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_launchpad_finalists.php">Veodia back in June</a> - check out the video below for more details. If any RWW readers know of other startups doing this, please mention in the comments.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5iVAL52iOHo&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5iVAL52iOHo&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Up till now enterprises have been using mostly person-to-person and text-based communication to collaborate. Video hasn't taken off in a big way, perhaps because enterprise video solutions haven't  been packaged  as easy-to-use consumer-like tools. Not to mention network restrictions. That's not to say video hasn't been used <em>at all</em> - I recall it being used a fair amount back in 2000-01 on the enterprise intranet I was in charge of at the time. However perhaps 2008 is the time when it will ramp up. </p>
<p>No company is better placed than Google to exploit this - it owns the world's most popular consumer online video app (YouTube) and has rapidly become the leading Web Office vendor. It's even started nipping at Microsoft's heels in office software.</p>
<p><font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/Google_Video_for_Business_Launches_YouTube_for_Enterprise';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>There's still a long way for Google to go to catch up to Microsoft in the enterprise software world, but we think that Google Video for business will get them another couple of steps closer. What do you think?</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_video_for_business_launches.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_video_for_business_launches.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_video_for_business_launches.php</guid>
         <category>Enterprise</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:01:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>11 Things Startups Should Know About Enterprise 2.0</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/rww_enterprise.jpg" />Yesterday we wrote about <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_nature_of_the_firm.php">Enterprise 2.0 from the point of view of the Enterprise</a>, the buyer. The conclusion was that the impact of social media on the Enterprise was very big, addressing the very "nature of the firm". This post looks at <strong>Enterprise 2.0 from the point of view of the vendor</strong>, specifically <strong>startups</strong>. This is a 30,000 foot view, but we aim to get past the hype to insights you can use in your startup. Further posts in our recently launched Enterprise Chanel will drill into specific market segments, companies and technologies. <br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7060&amp;cb=7060' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7060&amp;n=7060' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<ol>
<li><strong>Subscriptions are the best revenue you can get.</strong> Subscription revenue is more recession proof than advertising and more predictable than traditional enterprise software licensing. As long as you don't mess up, you will have a low churn rate. Then your new subscriptions drive your revenue growth</li>

<p><li><strong>It is much easier to get subscriptions from a business than from consumers.</strong> Sure we all love the idea of consumer subscriptions, the potential is enormous. But do this reality check. How many subscriptions do <strong>you</strong> pay for? How many current subscription costs would you love to eliminate or drastically reduce? What would your really (no, <strong>really</strong>) agree to pay for every month? We are in a serious consumer recession in the developed markets that may last a while. What was always hard, just got an awful lot harder. Selling to business is much easier, if you focus hard on the next rule. </li></p>

<p><li><strong>The other 80/20 rule</strong>. 80% of enterprise IT budgets just "keep the lights on". Only 20% goes to new stuff. I learned this in the technology nuclear winter in 2002, when a 20% cut in IT budgets meant that <strong>no</strong> (zero, nada) new projects were approved. If you can show how to reduce that 80%, you get a better shot at the 20%. That 80% market is a replacement market. You need to know what cost you are replacing. The incumbents are looking at the 20% budget as well and they have the inside track. You have to attack the 80% to make it big.</li></p>

<p><li><strong>"Parallel replacement" is new</strong>. The old enterprise replacement market was based on capital expenditure write offs. If the client bought a $1m license fee over 5 years ago, you had a shot at selling another license fee for something "better, faster, cheaper". In the new enterprise world of SAAS and open source, upfront license fees are the exception rather than the rule. Buyers prefer to hold onto the old stuff a bit longer until they can see either an open source or SAAS alternative.  Replacement is always very risky, leaving incumbents in control and startups banging outside the door in frustration. So you need to show that you can run in parallel with the existing solution for a period until you are established enough to be a viable, safe replacement. Step 1 is run in parallel, step 2 is replace. This is what Google Apps and Zoho are doing to Microsoft office (I use both Google Apps and MS Office. Even though I use Office less frequently I own a license, so why delete it? When I get a new laptop I will decide whether I need to buy Office). To play this new parallel replacement game you need to a) offer a free entry point (the<a href="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2006/03/the_freemium_bu.html"> Freemium</a> strategy) so you get traction with a low cost of sale and b) you need to show one very clear new value proposition that will tap into that 20% budget for new stuff.</li></p>

<p><li><strong>Have one simple new "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Ocean_Strategy">blue ocean</a>" value proposition that any business user can understand.</strong> You need this to access the 20% of budget going to new stuff. Being "cloudy" is not a value proposition, it is simple]y a way to deliver your value proposition. The incumbent can always launch their SAAS equivalent. Your free entry level just gets you through the door so that you get a chance to upsell to your subscription; free is not a value proposition. You have to show how you will do something really basic such as either a) increase revenue with a low cost of sale or, b) reduce cost on an existing process or c) create strategic sustainable advantage in <strong>measurable</strong> ways.  Most likely you will do this by enabling better collaboration/communication, both within the enterprise but also, more critically, outside the firewall to the "extended enterprise". For a startup, this has to be "blue ocean", a market that has not yet been defined by the incumbents. By its very nature, this means the market size will be very hard to define and there will almost certainly not be recognized external authority that has defined the market size. Smart VC understand that Blue Ocean strategy and precise market size estimates seldom go together.</li></p>

<p><li><strong>SaaS ++ means that Open Source is no longer a problem.</strong> Open Source has been great for buyers but it has also taken the entry level market away in most segments and that trend shows no sign of letting up. That is bad news for a startup looking to sell traditional software with a "better, faster, cheaper plus we try harder" replacement pitch. You cannot undersell Open Source. That has forced many ventures with great software and strong teams into the dead-pool. With a "SAAS ++" offering, you can use Open Source as the base, add a bit of new code and bundle it all up with hardware and service in a monthly fee. Unless buyers really want to do all that in-house, using their dwindling internal IT staff, you have a shot at it. SAAS alone however is not a barrier to entry. Anybody can replicate it. Which means (smart) VC will/should pass. You need the "++" bit as well. That is likely to be something to do with viral, communications and network effects that create a growing user base and proprietary data coming from that base. That is the "magic sauce".</li></p>

<p><li><strong>You need to become a very good financial and data modeler.</strong> You will need some old-fashioned face to face relationship selling to get large enterprises to understand your solution, so that the "powers that be" encourage adoption and do not seek to block it. But the business will grow one subscriber at a time and users convert to subscribers one click at a time. Modeling becomes a core competency. Modeling the costs of all the SaaS components (R&D, hardware, infrastructure software, software maintenance, system and data maintenance). Modeling the cost of subscriber acquisition using SEO, SEM, social networking, conversion from free to paid and inside telephone sales in a highly efficient funnel process that delivers the right $ per subscriber. Modeling the revenue growth with multiple what if variable assumptions. Modeling the ROI for your clients at various levels of adoption.</li></p>

<p><li><strong>Most external market size projections do not help your business plan.</strong> Forrester Research <a href="http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,43850,00.html">reports</a> that Enterprise 2.0 will be a $4.6 billion market by 2013.  That is not nearly granular enough for a real business plan. You are not really in the Enterprise 2.0 market. Saying "we will get 1% of the $4.6 billion Enterprise 2.0" market is totally meaningless and will simply get you shown the door in the VC office. You are in the market of solving a specific business problem, for a specific type of customer, competing against specific incumbents and startups. That is how you need to build a market size, from the bottom up. This is particularly true for "blue ocean" strategies where the market has not been defined by an incumbent. Building the real world, bottom up market size takes real hard work and detailed market knowledge. Look for a small enough market where you can get 20% and take that to 50% share and then leverage that market to get 10% in another market. Rinse and repeat. It is an old formula, but it works.</li> </p>

<p><li><strong>You need VC, they need you but there is a disconnect.</strong> Since 2000, most VC have sent any business plan with the word "enterprise" straight to the trash. With good reason. During the nuclear winter, the enterprise IT market was dead as a dodo. Then the big incumbents got into the consolidation game and it looked like you would count enterprise IT vendors on the fingers of one hand. The cost of entry was high, needing expensive sales teams upfront and the revenue was lumpy and unpredictable. Yech. Better to back a few inexpensive developers building a free service that some big vendor would buy and figure out how to monetize. That was a great game for a while. Most VC now view it as in its final innings at best. There is a shortage of buyers, no IPO market, we are in a cyclical downturn for advertising and in a major funk figuring out how social media can be funded by advertising. So VC need Enterprise 2.0. But they have missed the early winners. Very few of the current Enterprise 2.0 startups are venture backed. This is a disconnect. The early players always find it easier to bootstrap than later vendors. Today you need capital to fund the ramp-up and to build distance from competitors as the Enterprise 2.0 market moves from "below the radar" to "early hype" phase, thus dragging more entrants into every category.</li></p>

<p><li><strong>Vertical is not the same as Horizontal.</strong> Classic Web 2.0 services such as Delicious, YouTube and Skype are geared at mass markets. Anything that is more niche has tended to be called "vertical". That is confusing. Vertical means a specific industry such as banking, healthcare or manufacturing and sub-sets of those industries. Horizontal (applying to any industry) should mean a set of common and linked features used by a specific type of person in the company (e.g. accounts payable by Finance, CRM by Sales and so on). The general rule of thumb has been for vertical ventures to be bootstrapped and eventually rolled up into larger entities. VC tend to view vertical as too limited. Horizontal on the other hand is big enough.</li></p>

<p><li><strong>Know how to deal with secrecy, structure and control needs.</strong> Social Media is about being open, loose, unstructured, informal and fun; no ties allowed. Enterprises are about secrecy, structure and control. Ties show that you are serious and fun is for after work. The ties and fun bit is just style. But secrecy, structure and control is real. If you threaten those, many forces within the enterprise will shut you out. It will be like the red blood cells attacking the foreign virus. On the other hand, if you go along with all the secrecy, structure and control rules of the enterprise you will lose the social media benefits of extended enterprise collaboration and innovation. Many people within enterprises understand this and some of them are in a policy-making position of authority. In general, the trend is towards loose, unstructured,<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/emergent_business_networks.php"> "emergent business networks"</a>. So "make the trend your friend", but beware of the very strong forces of opposition and deal positively with their legitimate needs.</li></ol></p>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

<p>What is your position in the Enterprise 2.0 market. Do you work in IT in a large Enterprise? Do you work for a large incumbent Enterprise IT vendor? Do you work for a startup that is going to change the Enterprise world? Are you writing about this rapidly emerging market? Do you have unique insights or research to share? We would love to hear from you in the comments and maybe as a Guest Author. <strong><a href="mailto:editor@readwriteweb.com">Email us</a> if you're interested in writing for ReadWriteWeb's Enterprise Channel.</strong></p>

<p><em>You can subscribe now to our special <strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/enterprise.xml">RSS feed for the Enterprise channel</a></strong>.</em></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/11_things_to_know_about_enterprise_20.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/11_things_to_know_about_enterprise_20.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/11_things_to_know_about_enterprise_20.php</guid>
         <category>Enterprise</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:40:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Bernard Lunn</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Google Should Buy eXpresso</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/expresso_logo.png" />Like a lot of people, I had my problems with Google Apps this week. Sure, Google "feels my pain" but they also lost my confidence. And confidence is a delicate thing. What crashed for me was Spreadsheet. That has always been the weakest component for Google and the strongest for Microsoft. Excel rocks, its just a tad behind the times on collaboration.</p>

<p>But in this post we explain how Google could still win the spreadsheet game by buying <a href="http://www.expressocorp.com/">eXpress Corp</a>. </p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7001&amp;cb=7001' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7001&amp;n=7001' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>Let's look at the context. Google can win in Gmail and Document by getting Gears working. But the Spreadsheet problems go deeper and spreadsheets are mission critical. If you lose confidence its over. Today I got "Updating" in nice red letters, but that was still the same thing 10 minutes later. Then I got "We're back! Updating" and I thought, "phew". But still not working. My email (yes, in Gmail) to my collaborator read:</p>

<p>"forget about Google - they are having probs!</p>

<p>So here is good old fashioned xls"</p>

<p>The rule for start-ups - confidence takes a long time to win and a second to lose.</p>

<p>Google could win by buying <a href="http://www.expressocorp.com/">eXpress Corp</a>. We <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/expresso_web_office.php">reviewed the product here</a>. It is a natural bridge product for Google. They can get clients onto a collaborative Excel and then switch them to a mature all Google product when it is really ready for prime time.</p>

<p>Or Microsoft or Yahoo could buy eXpresso. No, I do not have any interest in eXpresso - I wish I did :-)</p>

<p>Then again, Google could just buy stronger Expresso and give it to their programmers and tell them to work harder and faster :-)</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_should_buy_expresso.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_should_buy_expresso.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_should_buy_expresso.php</guid>
         <category>Enterprise</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Bernard Lunn</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Online Office Suites: Zoho Adds Macro Recording</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="zoho_logo.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/zoho_logo.jpg" />Zoho's online office suite is getting closer and closer to becoming a real rival to Microsoft Office. One important update Zoho <a href="http://blogs.zoho.com/sheet/macros-pivot-tables-more-in-zoho-sheet/">recently released</a> was support for Visual Basic compatible macros in its spreadsheet application, which was great for importing already existing spreadsheets with macros, but writing macros was limited to coding them in a text editor. Today, Zoho has <a href="http://blogs.zoho.com/general/macro-recording-playback-in-zoho-sheet/">rolled out</a> an easy to use macro record and playback function, similar to what most offline office suites offer.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=7008&amp;cb=7008' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=7008&amp;n=7008' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>Focus on Business</h2>

<p>While Zoho also has a number of consumer oriented products in its line-up, <a href="http://writer.zoho.com/corporate/mailzoho.com/raju/Zoho-Sheet---Macros">the company notes</a> that it has lately been focusing mostly on providing features for businesses rather than consumers, which can be seen in the line-up of recent Zoho's products like Projects, CRM, and Invoice. Macros, too, are a feature that is mostly aimed at business users.</p>

<p><img alt="zoho_macro_record.jpg" align="right" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/zoho_macro_record.jpg"  /><a href="http://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a>, Zoho's largest competitor, offers a similar set of features (though no macro recording), but its overall product suite is limited to&#160; documents, spreadsheets, and presentations. Also, Adobe just launched its own online office product in June. Chances are that Microsoft is also working on a similar product, though for now, it is following its '<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/architecture/aa699384.aspx">Software+Services</a>' strategy and is using the Internet mostly for <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/office_live_workspace_vs_google_docs_feature_by_feature.php">storing documents</a> and some limited file viewing capabilites.</p>

<h2>Almost There</h2>

<p>While the current crop of online office suites can't quite match the feature set of traditional suites like Microsoft Office or OpenOffice yet, the steady <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_writer_adds_new_features.php">addition of features</a> and products is making the online suites a lot more competitive and while they are still somewhat limited when compared to MS Office, they are approaching a point where their feature set can satisfy the majority of customers.</p>

<p><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="437" height="336" id="viddler"><param name="movie" value="http://www.viddler.com/player/bc9327f0/" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/><embed src="http://www.viddler.com/player/bc9327f0/" width="437" height="336" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="transparent" name="viddler" ></embed></object></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_adds_macro_recording.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_adds_macro_recording.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_adds_macro_recording.php</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:26:54 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Frederic Lardinois</author>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>