ReadWriteWeb

Web 2.0 Summit Launchpad

Written by Richard MacManus / November 7, 2006 2:52 PM / 5 Comments

Read/WriteWeb's Web 2.0 Summit coverage sponsored by Yahoo!

The Launchpad at the Web 2.0 Summit is a popular event, the venue is packed.  13 companies have 5 minutes each. Here are some quick impressionistic views of how it went....

In the chair is a music-based video game, where people can interact with music - e.g. generate your own content and play along. It's being billed as a music publishing platform, with mashup and remix tools. Today is the launch of their version 2 beta. Seems like a cute tool, not sure how useful it is for most people.

instructables is "step-by-step collaboration" for home projects. It's targeted at "passionate" hobbyists. Again, it's a nice tool... not groundbreaking.

Klostu is positioning itself as "the blogosphere of bulletin boards". Its aim is to connect boards together, by giving you a unique id that you can use across multiple boards. As the presenter said, it "has all the bells and whistles of social networks".

A good concept perhaps, although not sure if it's compelling to bulletin board users - aren't they loyal to their particular boards? Not sure, but I'm curious to know the percentage of people who use multiple bulletin boards.

Sharpcast is next and this is a product I like (we've profiled it before on R/WW). It synchs data across PCs, the Web and mobile. Sharpcast Photos was the first such product, but today Gibu Thomas the CEO is launching a product code-named Hummingbird - which synchs all files. Gibu had some issues with his demo computers, but nevertheless the product is a compelling one I believe.

Rael Dornfest's new company has a product called stikki. He too was initially affected by demo issues. Stikkit is a yellow post-it notes tool. One of the things it does is "make messy data smarter" and allows you to share that data. So it's a very granular data-sharing app. It aims to get as close to paper as possible. Sounds interesting, but it'll have a tough job replacing paper in my life (I still use paper notebooks!).

Turn is a search-like tool for online advertising. It has bidded CPA pricing, for graphical and text ads. The CPA actions could be a sale, a lead or anything. They claim to analyze webpages to determine which ads are suitable for it. They rank all their ads based on the probability of action. They call this "automated targeting". It sounds impressive, particularly as CPA is mostly an unsolved problem right now on the Web.

Sphere is a blog search engine. It's had a lot of blogosphere buzz already, but Technorati still seems to dominate this space. Now they're partnering with mainstream media, starting with MarketWatch. They have also introduced a little clickable pop-up link, which displays related blogs and articles.

Omnidrive is an online storage app, that aims to merge the desktop with the web. It's now positioning itself as a "storage aggregator". It has both a desktop and web interface, which both have an OS style interface. It also has sharing features and a developer API.

Adify enables you to build your own advertising networks - creating "one thousand John Battelles" in the presenter's words. [nb: by this point I'm getting drowsy... not Adify's fault, I should add! But it's a long session and there's only so many product pitches I can bear....]

3B is a 3D social network, that operates from inside the browser. You can use MySpace, Hi5 or Bebo pages or photos you've loaded onto Flickr, Photobucket or any other web service. For example it can spider MySpace, allowing you to add your friends there onto 3B. You can see and interact with your friends with 3B. It's also a visual search tool, allowing you to order search windows in the 3D space. You can change the wallpaper and create "personal 3D spaces". It looks like it uses scraping to put other web content inside this 3D environment. Intriguing product, which I am keen to explore some more. Received a good round of applause from the crowd here.

oDesk is a jobs website and community. It basically matches freelancers (called "providers") with employers. It has some project management tools to complement all this. One of its aims to is to "build trust" between participants - e.g. it can take screenshots of the worker every 6 hours and track their mouseclicks (!!!). How this builds trust I don't know...

Venyo also aims to build trust, by giving blogs and other sites reputations. Includes the Vindex, a "global trust index." Sounds like a little too much work for the participants. It's a nice idea and possibly has a market, but getting take-up will be challenging.

Timebridge is a scheduling and calendaring tool. It works with Outlook and works by proposing meetings to participants by email. Participants reply via a team environment. At this point Timebridge does the scheduling (finds suitable time for everyone, confirms and notifies, etc). Sounds like an interesting value-add for Outlook users, but is it enough to lure Outlook users to try it?

Summary

Phew, that was a long session and everyone is tired now. Of all the ones listed here, 3B was the one that intrigued me the most. But check out the ones that interest you and let us know what you think.



6 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2853

Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts

  1. hi richard -

    re: oDesk demo @ Web 2.0, you wrote:

    >>One of its aims to is to "build trust" between participants
    >>can take screenshots of the worker every 6 hours and track their mouseclicks
    >>How this builds trust I don't know...

    i think the point folks may have missed about the activity logs is that they provide the basis for workers to get paid; thus the monitoring may appear to be "big brother"-like, but actually that's what helps ensure they receive payment, along with other time-tracking tools & feedback ratings.

    over the long-term, the feedback scores from multiple assignments help build trust & feedback scores. within any given assignments, the verified time logs and desktop snapshots help make sure both buyers & providers know the work and payments are validated.

    hope that helps explain the comment,

    - dave mcclure

    Posted by: Dave McClure | November 7, 2006 4:01 PM



  2. I'm using oDesk for a total redesign and rebuild of our web page. Though early days in our relationship, I would currently recommend them to anyone - and the screen shots is one of the drivers of that.

    By looking at the screenshots I was able to understand firstly whether they were interacting with the documentation we had sent them or just leaving it open ... as soonas they started building, I was able to look at what wasn't working before they'd even mentioned it to me. It helped to head off problems before they emerged.

    The trust comes when I know that they are working for the time they say they are. I have plenty of chances to take issue, raise queries, and so on before I pay a penny - the critical thing is that by making it visible, oDesk are radically changing the way small organisations look for and interact with offshore providers.

    This isn't to say that there aren't hiccups, and I have fed these back to oDesk as they have come up. Currently, however, I would recommend them to anyone.

    Posted by: Oliver Luker | November 9, 2006 4:18 AM



  3. What value does oDesk really bring to the table long term to validate the hefty 30% commission they charge on an hourly basis?
    The longer your project runs, the more commission you pay to oDesk. Maybe they do add value initially by providing a list of freelancers to pick from, but what's the value long term? I feel that, requests from other employers to "your programmer" on a regular basis would decrease their dependency on you and make them less reliable long term. So I can see oDesk working for short term projects, but long term, I don't see much value. And for short term, you might as well use Rentacoder or Elance.

    Posted by: Michael | November 11, 2006 6:34 AM



  4. hi michael -

    the long-term value, as explained above, is the ongoing monitoring and screenshots that provide a verified work history throughout the project.

    for more info on how it works, checkout:
    http://www.odesk.com/tour

    on the contrary, due to the detailed work history and pre-screened provider network, oDesk is very well-suited for long-term projects as well as short. this has also been substantiated by & reflected in average oDesk project length / size that's about 2-5x as large as those on Rentacoder, Elance, or Guru.

    Posted by: Dave McClure | November 13, 2006 5:08 PM



  5. (full disclosure: i've been helping oDesk for the past few months with marketing & product consulting. i've been fairly transparent on that issue on other sites, however thought i'd note it for the record here just to be clear).

    - dave mcclure

    Posted by: Dave McClure | November 13, 2006 5:11 PM



RWW SPONSORS


FOLLOW @RWW ON TWITTER

ReadWriteWeb on Facebook



TEXT LINK ADS