<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>WidgetsLive - ReadWriteWeb</title>
      <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/widgetslive/</link>
      <description>WidgetsLive on ReadWriteWeb</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 Richard MacManus</copyright>
      <managingEditor>readwriteweb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:49:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.23-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Homepage Widgets Panel at WidgetsLive: How Start Pages are Evolving</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/105/290940782_0cf8eb6b52.jpg?v=0" /></p>

<p>This <a href="http://widgetslive.com">WidgetsLive</a> panel featured Adam Sah from <a
href="http://www.google.com/ig">Google Personalized Homepage</a>, Sanaz Ahari from
Microsoft's <a href="http://www.live.com">Live.com</a>, and Tariq Krim from <a
href="http://www.netvibes.com">Netvibes</a>. After the usual product intros, the panel
got more interesting with conversations steered by Niall Kennedy (the moderator).</p>

<p>Niall started by asking about monetization. Sanaz said that being a homepage for Microsoft
properties is key for them, rather than making money as a standalone product by
advertising. Adam said it's similar at Google and they want to drive traffic to their
properties via the start page.</p>

<p>In terms of how they're driving users to their start pages, Tariq said that their
growth is viral. Sanaz said that for Microsoft, giving users the choice of lots of
content and pointing them to directories is important - which gives live.com utility for
users. Adam said that Google tries "not to play favorites" [with the widgets they
display] and they want to enable discovery - like in search.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=5131&amp;cb=5131' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=5131&amp;n=5131' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>Niall asked whether businesses can 'buy' their way onto the homepage lists. Adam said
no and that they try to find ways to rank gadgets - making the good ones bubble to the
top. Sanaz said that Microsoft has been playing around with a few models - the directory,
the gallery ("our community"), and thirdly the Web (user adds their own modules, via
search etc). She said they're "in a learning phase", so Microsoft is still
experimenting.</p>

<p>Niall mentioned that widgets interacting with each other is important. Tariq said they
need to figure out how widgets communicate with each other - and standardize that. He
said a new business model may evolve once the industry has achieved that. Sanaz said that
for start.com and then live.com, that was the main driver - but the main issue for them
is security, which needs to be scalable. Adam said "it's possible to do inter-gadget
communication", but he says there's been little demand from users so far. He hasn't seen
many gadgets that achieve this.</p>

<p>Finally Niall asked the panel whether the start page is a jump-off page for users, or
one where users will stick around. Sanaz said it's a combination of both - and that some
users spend a high amount of time on live.com. Tariq said that start pages are evolving
towards creating "a longer term relationship with the user". Speaking of which... I spoke
to Tariq earlier today in the hallways and he told me that <b>productivity</b> is a key
theme going forward for Netvibes. I interpreted this to mean he wants people to <i>do
things</i> and run apps from within Netvibes, not just use it as a 'start page' to jump
off to other sites.</p>

<p>Interesting panel and the differences between the three services was noticeable.
Netvibes (and <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/business_models_start_pages.php">other</a> independents like <a href="http://www.pageflakes.com">Pageflakes</a> and <a
href="http://www.webwag.com">Webwag</a>) need to find a way to monetize their services,
but Microsoft and Google have the luxury of not needing to worry about that. But also you
can see the cultures of both Microsoft and Google show through in their start pages -
Microsoft wants to use it as a homepage for their properties (including search) and a
directory; whereas Google is more focused on searching and ranking widgets (although to
be fair, they also obviously want to drive traffic to their properties). But for all
these companies, I'm expecting start pages to evolve more to one where widgets can
interact and also communicate with non-PC apps (like TV or mobile) - and also become more
like productivity tools, as Tariq said.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/homepage_widgets.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/homepage_widgets.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/homepage_widgets.php</guid>
         <category>WidgetsLive</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:49:46 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Fox Interactive Gets Into Widgets Game</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/103/290728873_c67b59fa0e_m.jpg"
alt="springwidgets" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="240" height="50" />I'm here
at <a href="http://widgetslive.com/">Widgets Live</a> in San Francisco, where Dan Strauss and Don Synstelien
from Fox Interactive Media are onstage talking about their new widget platform called <a
href="http://www.springwidgets.com/">SpringWidgets</a>. The defining feature of this
product is that it works on <b><i>both</i></b> the desktop (like Konfabulator) and in the
browser (like Google widgets). However the desktop part is Windows only for now - Mac
support is coming.</p>

<p>Their showcase widget currently is the <a
href="http://www.springwidgets.com/widgets/view/23">RSS Reader widget</a> - it displays
rss feeds, video and podcasts. If you have a Feedburner feed, you can <a
href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/publishers/springwidgets">customize your widget</a>,
which came about as a result of a partnership between FIM and Feedburner. SpringWidgets
has a <a href="http://www.springwidgets.com/developers">developer platform</a> too, so
the platform is flexible for publishers and developers alike.</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/117/290729228_9853fe6ded.jpg?v=0" /></p>

<p>The other defining feature is that SpringWidgets can be easily shared - users can
click a small green icon (the widgets equivalent to the orange 'subscribe' button) and
put the widget either on their website/blog, social network (e.g. MySpace), their
desktop, or all of the above.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p align="right"><em>Sponsor</em><br /><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=5130&amp;cb=5130' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=11205&amp;cb=5130&amp;n=5130' border='0' alt='' align="right" /></a></p>]]>

<![CDATA[<p>As <a
href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/06/fox-interactive-launches-desktopwebsite-widget-platform/">
Mike Arrington noted</a>, Microsoft is probably SpringWidgets' biggest competitor - as
they will have widgets built into Vista. But also watch out for both Yahoo and Google, as
these days all of the big players need widgets to be usable across desktop-Web. As we
have <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/elephants_and_evolution.php">explored</a> at
length recently on Read/WriteWeb, desktop/browser integration is increasingly important
in the Web world. Indeed <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googlegadgets.php">Google already offers</a>
two types of gadgets: <a href="http://desktop.google.com/plugins/">desktop plug-ins</a>
for the Google Desktop and <a href="http://www.google.com/ig/directory">Personalized
Homepage gadgets</a> for the Web. Yahoo of course has a strong <a
href="http://widgets.yahoo.com/">desktop widgets platform</a> (previously known as
Konfabulator).</p>

<p>As for SpringWidgets, being a FIM property means that MySpace integration will be key
to their rollout success. But it's interesting to see SpringWidgets casting a much wider
net than just the MySpace platform - other web platforms plus desktop too. It means
they're taking on the big Internet companies like Microsoft, Google and Yahoo. More proof
that widgets are an increasingly important trend - certainly the hot thing amongst the
early adopter geeks right now, as podcasting was last year at this time and RSS the year
before.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> <a href="http://stickiwidgets.com/2006/11/06/springwidgets-by-fox-interactive-media/">StickiWidgets points out</a> that SpringWidgets is potentially a great platform for distributing Fox's own media content.</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fox_interactive_springwidgets.php#comments-open">Discuss</a></strong>]]>

</description>
         <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fox_interactive_springwidgets.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fox_interactive_springwidgets.php</guid>
         <category>WidgetsLive</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 10:17:07 -0800</pubDate>
<author>Richard MacManus</author>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>