Social media, or at least its widespread use, may be relatively new, but certain human behaviors are not. For example, David Aaker, blogging at the Harvard Business Review, points to a study by Ernest Dichter from 1966 on word-of-mouth persuasion.
The report had three key findings, all of which are relevant to social business today.
Aaker writes, "An implication is that a firm promoting its own brand needs to be aware of its status and emphasize facts instead of opinion, represent the right culture and values, and have a balanced perspective."
According to Aaker, the study found that word-of-mouth has a huge impact, confirming earlier work by sociologist Elihu Katz and Paul Felix Lazerfield.
For all the pontification, and even quantitative analysis, of what "works" in social media, it's interesting how much of it comes down to things that probably sounded like common sense even back in 1966.
I've written before about how often in technology we come back to the same problems again and again.
For a more contemporary look at word-of-mouth marketing, you might want to check out the work of Andy Sernovitz. I've heard good things.
Photo by kioan