ReadWriteStart

Build an Insanely Great Web Service

Written by Bernard Lunn / June 25, 2009 2:30 PM / 24 Comments

This post is part of our ReadWriteStart channel, which is dedicated to profiling startups and entrepreneurs. The channel is sponsored by Microsoft BizSpark. To sign up for BizSpark, click here.

This is one post/chapter in a serialized book called Startup 101. For the introduction and table of contents, please click here.

First, the good news: building a website today is ten times cheaper and faster than it was 10 years ago. Now, the bad news: building a website today is ten times cheaper and faster than it was 10 years ago.

You are entering an incredibly crowded marketplace. You have to get and keep people's attention extremely fast, because hundreds of other services are just a click away. The bar is set very high, and knowing exactly how high does help. If you reach too low, you will only catch air and crash to the ground.

Six Milestones from 30 Seconds to 3 Years

Here is what an insanely great Web product looks like to the average user right now and through the next 3 years:

  • 30 seconds: "I get it."
  • 3 minutes: "I've used it and still get it, and it has not annoyed me yet."
  • 3 days: "I find this really useful or fun."
  • 3 weeks: "I am raving about this to other people."
  • 3 months: "I couldn't imagine not having this, and I'm boring my friends telling them about it."
  • 3 years: "How weird to see this on Oprah."

The 30-Second Milestone

You can moan all you like about what attention deficit disorder has done for user engagement, but it won't help you one bit. Get over it. People don't automatically care about your product and won't invest any time to find out if they should care. This rule is as old as consumer markets. This is what those guys on Madison Avenue with their jingles and insipid ad slogans have always known. Political sound bites live in this same reality.

Does this feel fake and insubstantial to you, the engineer, schooled in solving big, hard, complex problems?

So, study this like you would any other big, hard, complex problem. Making a product or service look totally simple and obvious is a big, hard, complex problem.

In 30 seconds, a user who comes to your website should be able to say:

  • "I get what they are offering."
  • "This might help or amuse me."
  • "I know what I have to do next."

There is a science to achieving this; it has been documented. You need to look at great examples and understand how they did it. Then you need to test and change, test and change, test and change, test and change, and then test and then change, until you go crazy!

The 3-Minute Milestone

After using your website for 3 minutes, the user should be able to say:

  • "I still understand what they are offering, and it does help or amuse me."
  • "This has not annoyed me yet."
  • "This could be even more fun or useful than I thought."
  • "I know what to do next to find out if this could be even more fun or useful."

The 3-Day Milestone

Now is the time to worry about stuff like performance and reliability. If you get to the 3-week milestone and bomb, your fanatical users will cut you some slack. But at this stage? Zero slack.

Have you been planning for this milestone since the design stage? Are you running on a cloud service with auto-scaling and recovery? No. Whoops! You had better hope your product is not insanely great, but rather just reasonably good and will grow steadily. Hint: build on a cloud service (like Amazon AWS) from the start.

The Three Remaining Milestones

  • 3-week milestone
    You'll know you have hit this when VCs return your calls and VCs you have never heard of call you out of the blue. Close fast to leverage your hotness. Don't get all arrogant and believe you can do it alone. With this kind of traction, you can raise capital cheaply (and thus have less dilution), so do it.
  • 3-month milestone
    If you reach this stage, you can skip ahead to the chapter on "How to Scale Without Losing Your Shirt."
  • 3-year milestone
    If you reach this stage, skip ahead to the chapter on "Planning Your Exit."

Concept vs. Execution

We have reached the point that almost any website can be built quickly and cheaply. Money to scale awaits only for sites that actually gain traction. Management teams take care of the basics when you have traction and money. So, in the age-old debate about which is more important, concept or execution, concept is currently winning. You have to have something that meets a real need or is addictively fun.

The area where concept and execution intersect is usability. A concept that does not grab users within 30 seconds and move them through those other milestones is totally useless. Basecamp is all about usability. Twitter is about usability. Gmail is about usability. The concept in each case is simple.

New Concept vs. Doesn't Suck vs. Fast Follower vs. Niche

Your website falls into one of four categories:

  1. New concept
    If you fall into this category, your product or service type does not have a name yet. It has no market space, category, or even articulated need yet. In a decade, the number of these concepts that actually gain traction is tiny. The number of them that get through the early-adopter phase to the mainstream (i.e. reach the 3-year milestone) is even smaller. In other words, good luck!
  2. Doesn't Suck
    This one is easier. This is a service you can describe as "[something] that doesn't suck." Google first offered "search that doesn't suck," and then followed it up with Gmail, which is "email that doesn't suck." In other words, don't be afraid to go after mature markets in which the current services are not that good. Spend a couple of days browsing online and you will see plenty of such opportunities.
  3. Fast Follower
    This applies to a new concept that makes your jaw drop and you think "OMG, this is so cool." And then you realize that doing something similar would actually be pretty simple. The first one to market with a new concept is not always the winner. It just looks that way because the originator gets lost in the dustbin of history when the better venture out-executes it. You need access to capital to do this right, because you have to move fast, which means hiring an A-Team. And A-Teams like to be paid a lot.
  4. Niche
    There are thousands of these. Your niche might be geographic or a user type. Most niches are limited in scale and so do not require much capital. These are ripe for bootstrapping. But don't think niches are easy. Users will still be very demanding.

Microsoft BizSpark is a startup program that gives you three-year access to the latest Microsoft development tools, as well as connecting you to a nationwide network of investors and incubators. Click here to apply.


Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteStart posts

  1. Thos butts are photoshoped.

    Posted by: k | June 25, 2009 3:44 PM



  2. Twitter:
    * 30 seconds: I don't get it
    * 3 minutes: I still don't get it.
    * 3 days: *Not using Twitter*
    * 3 weeks: Friend sent me a Twitter link, still don't get it
    * 3 months: Don't get it but it is addictive alright
    * 3 years: How did I live before without this?

    Great services can get over initial "I don't get it" problems.

     Posted by: Paul Author Profile Page | June 26, 2009 2:53 AM



  3. I think the most important thing for a website/service is to be simple.

    Twitter did the same thing: it made sharing your thoughts simple, as did Tumblr (there is still room for improvement there though)

    Posted by: Puranjay | June 26, 2009 3:25 AM



  4. thanks to this i found this very interesting and informative thanks again

    Posted by: akioshin | June 26, 2009 7:43 AM



  5. Ability to memorize how to do things on a site is a big one for me. This is where Facebook could use some huge improvements.

    Posted by: Rob | June 26, 2009 11:48 AM



  6. Anyone could compare this theory with practical examples?

     Posted by: Bart Author Profile Page | June 26, 2009 12:07 PM



  7. Great post! Nice to have some kind of matrix in which your startup falls and having an idea on what to focus on. Thanks again.

    Posted by: Olivier Dupuis | June 26, 2009 1:52 PM



  8. this was how I exactly felt when I first used Twitter - great stuff! :)

     Posted by: Paul Author Profile Page | June 27, 2009 8:08 AM



  9. You gave something to think about, thank you. I will start playing around with my site after reading this.

    Posted by: Tom | June 27, 2009 8:59 AM



  10. Kiva is a perfect example of this, including showing up on Oprah! This web-based social enterprise has revolutionalized micro-lending. Check it out at www.kiva.org

    Posted by: Sheela Sethuraman | June 28, 2009 6:16 AM



  11. Nice to read an article about this knowing that my startup is working fine. :D
    Check it out: http://www.lectr.com

    Posted by: Eugene | June 30, 2009 2:21 PM



  12. You forgot the 7 second milestone - users only stay on a website for an average of 7 seconds, that's one of the most important things for any website to consider!

    Posted by: Adam Brewer | July 1, 2009 8:18 AM



  13. Thanks this is so informative...

    however

    how we can get this result...
    * "I get what they are offering."
    * "This might help or amuse me."
    * "I know what I have to do next."

    some cases, unique visitor are not interested with our story so they don't know
    * "I get what they are offering."
    * "This might help or amuse me."
    * "I know what I have to do next."

    Posted by: arham | July 3, 2009 3:14 AM



  14. Anyone of us could compare this theory with practical examples?

    Posted by: Flowers | July 20, 2009 7:20 PM



  15. Nice simple and direct reminder of how it all stays together. Good reminder that your website has no magic without the magic that you bring to it! Thank you!

     Posted by: Brian Garrity Author Profile Page | July 26, 2009 3:25 PM



  16. thanks for article very

    Posted by: nusret | August 2, 2009 7:30 AM



  17. You site and the topics you've posted about are very informative things..It is really hard to find sites like this on the internet..I wish you luck on the road you're headed..thanks..
    Nilüfer evden eve nakliyat..
    Zeocu

    Posted by: evden eve nakliyat | August 14, 2009 3:50 PM



  18. interesting reading - thanks

    Posted by: Joe | September 1, 2009 8:11 AM



  19. Simplicity is the key for any internet business who wants to be successful.

    Based on your analysis, Our website, http://www.HappyTutors.com, is in a niche market, which takes more time and efforts to be successful milestone. However, once you reach that point, you're something to stay...

    http://www.HappyTutors.com
    ~ Connect Tutors with Students & Parents ~

    Posted by: HappyTutors.com - Connect Tutors with Students & Parents | September 6, 2009 11:47 PM



  20. I like Paul's Twitter example. What I think is missing from the formula though is context. If you don't give the user context then they may not "get" your website.

    Here's what I mean...when Twitter first came out I thought it was a big joke and waste of time. Why should I tell the world what I'm doing all day long...but when I started looking at it through the context of marketing (spread the word, find trends) and as a way for me to get a stream of filtered information from folks who know more than I do, then all of a sudden in about June 2009 I "get" Twitter and have been a Twitter evangelist ever since.

    Usability without context can take you only so far but no further.

    Posted by: Keno Mullings | September 15, 2009 7:41 AM



  21. I am not sure about the success rate of the "new concept" category, but these are the ones that have gotten the maximum traction in recent years. Some examples are - Twitter, Tiny urls, video sharing, social networking. maybe these comprise a very small percentage of "new concepts".

    And BTW, you dont necessarily have to plan your exist after 3 years. We at HyperOffice, have been in business for more than 10 years now, and going strong!

    Posted by: Project Pankaj | September 23, 2009 8:06 AM



  22. Flowers asked for examples, maybe ebay?

    Brands that fit the bill as follows:
    Ebay, Amazon, Yahoo, Google (of course)

    •30 seconds: "I get it."
    •3 minutes: "I've used it and still get it, and it has not annoyed me yet."
    •3 days: "I find this really useful or fun."
    •3 weeks: "I am raving about this to other people."
    •3 months: "I couldn't imagine not having this, and I'm boring my friends telling them about it."
    •3 years: "How weird to see this on Oprah."

    Posted by: EmmaM Author Profile Page | September 27, 2009 6:10 AM



  23. this is somewhat useful to know since i'm searching for a more useful and practical direction for my blog readers/listeners/watchers.

    Posted by: Busted Keys | October 14, 2009 4:39 PM



  24. its an amazing offer.

    Posted by: skin care | October 18, 2009 1:03 AM



Leave a comment

Optional: Sign in with Connect Facebook   Sign in with Twitter Twitter   Sign in with OpenID OpenID  |