ReadWriteStart

How First-Time Entrepreneurs Can Work with Investors

Written by Bernard Lunn / May 12, 2009 7:00 PM / 16 Comments

This post is part of our ReadWriteStart channel, which is a resource and guide for first-time entrepreneurs and startups. The channel is sponsored by Microsoft BizSpark. To sign up for BizSpark, click here.

This is one post/chapter in a serialized book called Startup 101. For the introduction and table of contents, please click here.

Venture capitalists (VCs) have a very simple job. All they have to do is find an entrepreneur who has already created at least one hugely successful venture and then invest in his or her next venture. Only one problem: that's like finding hen's teeth.

What that means is that, first, they have to find somebody who has had a great success. Then from among that group, they have to find the ones who want to do it all over again, rather than play golf. Finally, they have to find the one who will take VC money even if they don't need it (because if they have had that big success, they'll have a lot of money in the bank). When they finally discover that rarest of beasts, the VC will find many competitors knocking on the same door.

So, VCs Do Have to Back First-Time Entrepreneurs

At ReadWriteStart, we celebrate and serve the first-time entrepreneur. So, you may be pleased to hear that VCs do need to back first-time entrepreneurs. But you should also know that you are their second choice. They don't really want to back you. They would much prefer backing a "serial entrepreneur." An old VC line is, "We back the jockey, not the horse."

Let's be clear about what VCs mean by "serial entrepreneur." Dressing up a resume so that you look like a serial entrepreneur won't get you past the initial screening. What they mean is an entrepreneur who has raised VC money and gotten the VC a return of 10 times or more. That is the gold standard they are looking for. Everything else is second best; silver medal, if you like. Here are two serial-entrepreneur silver-medal types:

  1. Raised VC money and exited, but with a weak return. If VCs see an entrepreneur get sideswiped by a market shift but still pull in a return, they will be willing, but careful, to give them another shot.
  2. Bootstrapped one or more ventures without VC funding and saw small-scale success. VCs will see your grit and like it. That experience is valuable. The question that will nag you is, "Does this entrepreneur know how to scale?" This is not a minor issue. Some of the lessons you learned from bootstrapping are great: all sensible investors love capital efficiency. But some of the lessons may not be so good. In bootstrapping, you tend to trade scale for short-term cash flow. VCs obviously don't want entrepreneurs to throw money at problems. But you do need to show that you know how to scale.

The above types fall into the "Proceed with caution" category.

Do you recognize yourself in one of these types? Are you a silver-medal serial entrepreneur? If not, then maybe you're a first-time entrepreneur...

Three Types of First-Time Entrepreneur

  1. Young, just out of college, maybe had one job with a startup. This has been the primary model in the Web 2.0 era. It usually means (a) that the entrepreneur is a developer who can build a first version and get some traction without any outside money, and (b) that the entrepreneur, being young, sees a trend that older people miss. The big debate here is when and how to bring in experienced management. VCs often like this type of entrepreneur because they have masses of energy and don't know what's not possible. Their low expectations for compensation also help build a capital-efficient venture. Some of the greatest success stories fit into this category; think Bill Gates. But for every poster child, there is a ton of failures.
  2. A lot of middle- to senior-management experience at large companies and now wants to jump into startup land. The track record of these "transplants" is pretty awful. If you fall into this category, try working for a fairly mature startup before starting one yourself. (See the next point.)
  3. Apprenticed with a superb entrepreneur in a really great startup. There is some branding value here: "Fred from Google/PayPal/Skype/YouTube/Salesforce [insert favorite hugely successful venture here]" sounds good. If the manager really has learned from the venture and contributed to its success (being along for the ride does not count), she or he is the best kind of first-time entrepreneur. So, it's simple then: just get in on the ground floor of the next great venture.

The Contrarian View

One investor who is low profile but has a great track record always insists on backing first-time entrepreneurs. His simple reason is, "Fire in the belly." This required him to work much harder to evaluate each venture and bring his experience to it. But it worked for him.

He points out how many really expensive second venture blowouts there are. These happen when a famous entrepreneur can do no wrong, and nobody has the guts to say, "This is crazy. Stop." Think Steve Jobs with NeXT. But then, on his third venture -- call it Apple 2.0 --- he was a phenomenal success again.

So, the best VC formula is to back the third venture, when the first was good and the second was a washout.

Understand What Worries VCs About First-Time Entrepreneurs

Understand some of the things that worry VCs and you will have a better shot at overcoming their concerns. These concerns really boil down to three:

  1. You will not hit your numbers. Ventures live by numbers. Those numbers may be revenue or profit or page views or number of subscribers or another metric that eventually can be converted to revenue and profit. A track record with larger companies may help, particularly with ones that have a reputation for disciplined execution.
  2. You won't listen to advice. This is particularly problematic if you are not hitting your numbers, when you might need help the most. If you have never been the CEO of a VC-funded company, you may not know how to do this well. It does not mean saying "Yessiree" to every suggestion by a VC. Nor does it mean being defensive.
  3. You don't have that entrepreneurial gene. VCs are looking for that mix of toughness and flexibility that is the hallmark of a great entrepreneur. If they cannot see that in your track record, expect them to want to spend a lot of time getting to know you.

Understand the Trade-Off You Represent

As a first-time entrepreneur, you offer investors a trade-off. You will give them less experience than they'd want, but you will provide a lot of fire-in-the-belly tenacity, grit, and hard work. It is also likely that you will have to de-risk the venture way more than you would like before getting serious money. Investors will want to back you slowly and carefully, getting to know you and your venture before writing the big checks.

Image credit: kate at yr own risk.

Microsoft BizSpark is a startup program that gives you three-year access to the latest Microsoft development tools, as well as connecting you to a nationwide network of investors and incubators. Click here to apply.


Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteStart posts

  1. These posts are awesome!
    congratz

    Posted by: Tivrious | May 12, 2009 8:04 PM



  2. Good information and I agree an entrepreneur with a known track record has a perceived advantage.

    However with todays interconnected world more people are able to be much more "known" than ever before so the product or service you are building along with the stage is more important than ever.

    Posted by: Christopher | May 12, 2009 8:46 PM



  3. This is bang on in terms of my experience - fricken great article

    Posted by: Nathalie | May 12, 2009 9:04 PM



  4. Thank You Bernard for a brilliantly written, informative article- I shall be recommending people to come and have a read!

    Posted by: Claire Boyles (Business Coach) | May 12, 2009 10:38 PM



  5. These is really a nice article. These is very informative article.
    Thanks and congrats.

    Posted by: Ricky | May 13, 2009 1:30 AM



  6. How do you consider the chances of first time entrepreneurs that are young, right out of college and did not succeed with their first VC-backed company at all? Will they be rejected by almost every VC in the future due to their failure with their first venture? What are your recommendations for this (and in my mind above neglected) group of entrepreneurs in order to get a second chance?

    Though thanks for the great article and the information!!

    Posted by: Peter | May 13, 2009 4:19 AM



  7. great post.

    where would a self employed developer who has years of experience be on a VC list of people to speak too?

    Posted by: Darren | May 13, 2009 4:25 AM



  8. Peter (#6). A lot of baloney is talked about this - failure as a teacher etc. The reality is that you will need to prove way more with traction than somebody with a successful venture (or even no track record, positive or negative). Options: get traction without external financing. Or apprentice with a great entrepreneur. As an early employee you might be a great bet. The risk is lower (the entrepreneur is just betting a few months salary to test you out) and the experience - what went wrong - is valuable to the entrepreneur.

     Posted by: Bernard Lunn Author Profile Page | May 13, 2009 6:07 AM



  9. Darren (# 7). Build your site. Even the earliest stage investor wants to see a site. Even some user traction. The site is your resume and your plan.

     Posted by: Bernard Lunn Author Profile Page | May 13, 2009 6:08 AM



  10. Thank you for your quick reply and the outlined options. They seem reasonable. Getting up after failing the first VC-backed venture and following the dream of becoming a true and great entrepreneur building a great company just really calls for strong personalities with high intrinsic motivation.

    Posted by: Peter | May 13, 2009 6:31 AM



  11. Thanks for the feedback Bernard

    Posted by: Darren | May 13, 2009 9:11 AM



  12. Excellent article, and very true from my own experience.

    The challenge of building a startup without investors (silver medal #2) and actually succeeding is an incredibly good indicator of not only the tenacity of the entrepreneur, but also their chance of future success. Once you prove your own a time or two without external help, opportunities do open up easier with investors.

    Posted by: Daniel McClintock | May 13, 2009 8:57 PM



  13. I'm glad to see that most VCs are positive towards college grads. I am actually looking for funding for an idea of mind and this blog post was published just in time. Although some entrepreneurs said that working with VCs or running a VC-funded startup will be hard, I think it will be an amazing experience, during the process of acquiring the funds as well as working with VCs.

    Posted by: Wayne Liew | May 14, 2009 7:38 PM



  14. shall be recommending people to come and have a read!

    Posted by: Sand castings | June 3, 2009 10:29 PM



  15. "But for every poster child, there is a ton" -> "But for every poster child, there are a ton"

    Posted by: Michael | July 9, 2009 6:58 PM



  16. As a first time entrepreneur you probably have tons of questions. Legal and accounting issues may not seem important when you are starting your company, but they are. Legal and accounting mistakes that you make early on can haunt you for years and can be expensive to fix. So if you are going to start a company you should do things right from the get go.

    Posted by: Famous entrepreneurs | February 2, 2010 9:31 PM



Leave a comment

Optional: Sign in with Connect Facebook   Sign in with Twitter Twitter   Sign in with OpenID OpenID  |