Apple - ReadWriteWeb http://www.readwriteweb.com/feeds/tag/Apple en Copyright 2010 Richard MacManus readwriteweb@gmail.com Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:15:56 -0800 http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.23-en http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss iGroups: Apple Files Patent for Location-Based Social Networking App apple_logo_jan09.pngBased on a patent filing that was published by the USPTO today and first discovered by Patently Apple, Apple could soon enter the location-based social networking market. The patent, which was filed in September 2008, describes a scenario where a group of users with mobile devices like the iPhone come together at an event like a concert, wedding, political rally or trade show. Normally, you would have to collect personal information from all the attendees you meet and then transfer this data manually into your existing social network if you want to stay in touch with them. Apple's patent, however, describes a system where all of the devices in a specific location can automatically become part of a new social network based on their location. The patent filing refers to this service as iGroups.

]]>Sponsor

]]> This could, for example, allow event organizers to provide attendees with additional content and services during the event and after it is over. The exchange of this information would be brokered by trusted devices at the event and information about the social network can be stored in the cloud and exchanged with other services.

apple_patent_igroup.jpg

Turning Ad Hoc Networks into Permanent Social Networks

As Apple notes in the patent ("Group Formation Using Anonymous Broadcast Information "), technologies like Bluetooth personal area networks allow modern cell phones to easily create ad hoc networks, but it is virtually impossible to recreate this network at a later time for users to continue their discussions or exchange additional content.

In a very detailed example, Apple's patent describes how iGroups could automatically detect that a group of users is in or around a specific location (in the example, this event is Apple WWDC 2008). The iGroups service could then invite all the attendees to join this group and create a permanent social network for everybody who was in attendance and opts in to the group.

Will Apple Actually Do Anything With This Patent?

This, of course, isn't Apple's first patent for a location-based service. As with all of Apple's patents, it remains to be seen if the company will actually release any product based on this filing. Given Apple's position in the mobile market, however, it wouldn't come as a surprise if the company decided to turn some of these patents into actual product.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/igroups_apple_files_patent_for_location-based_soci.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/igroups_apple_files_patent_for_location-based_soci.php Apple Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:43:08 -0800 Frederic Lardinois
NPR and WSJ Building iPad-Only Websites The Wall Street Journal and National Public Radio (NPR) will be launching custom-built iPad-only websites next month when the new Apple slate computer known as the iPad is made available for sale. Both sites will automatically detect when web surfers arrive via an iPad device and will then show those visitors a special version of the site, customized exclusively for the iPad. How exactly will these sites compare to the web pages regular site visitors see? There's just one difference: they won't feature any Adobe Flash technology.

]]>Sponsor

]]> NPR's New iPad Site: Entirely Flash Free

According to reports from MediaMemo, NPR is removing all traces of Adobe Flash, which powers its website's media and graphics, from its iPad-only version. Although many news organizations use Flash to display multimedia presentations and audio and video content, NPR in particular was going to be heavily affected by Apple's refusal to support Flash on the new iPad devices. That's because a key feature on NPR's website is its Flash-based audio player, something that's featured on nearly every webpage site-wide.

Kinsey Wilson, senior vice president and general manager of NPR Digital Media, recently told Poynter that their developers decided to work around the problem by implementing an HTML5-based player instead. Wilson also noted that the company has a "launch sponsor" for the iPad-only site, since it won't be able to support web ads, which are often coded in Flash.

WSJ: A Flash-Free Front Page

The Wall Street Journal, a News Corp. property, is also building an iPad-only version of their site - well, actually just an iPad-only front page. Unlike NPR's iPad site, which will be 100% Flash-free, WSJ visitors who follow links deeper into the website will soon discover that not all its page have been converted. Here, they'll run into the soon-to-be-infamous "blue box," the lego-like symbol that appears where a Flash content should have been.

There aren't any demos or mockups of these new websites available, so it's unknown at this time if they're being changed in other ways to accommodate iPad visitors. That is to say, it's unknown if they will be exact replicas of the non-iPad versions but just with the Flash content removed, or if they will perhaps sport an entirely new design.

Start of a New Trend?

With these two leading media companies making this sort of change, it's reasonable to imagine that others will soon follow. And while iPad owners will certainly appreciate the adjustments - that blue lego is such an eyesore, after all - the need for so many custom versions of the same site may become a burden on businesses who need to reach a wide audience.

Today, companies are already tasked with creating a traditional website, a mobile website and sometimes a customized mobile website designed just for iPhone visitors. Now there's the iPad-only website to code for and soon there may be another one, too. Recent news reports state that Amazon is working on a new web browser just for their Kindle e-Reader. Will that be yet another website needing its own custom version?

So Many Versions of the Same Site!

It's bad enough that the mobile application ecosystem itself is so fragmented - developers have several platforms to code for from the iPhone to Android, plus Palm, Windows Mobile - including the new Windows Phone 7 Series, Symbian and Blackberry, to name a few. Now it seems they'll have a number of unique mobile devices to support as well?

The web was supposed to be the one unifying "platform" that works anywhere, on any device, no matter what hardware is used to access it. But thanks to varying screen sizes and differing feature sets (most notably Apple's refusal to allow Flash on their mobile devices), those who want to provide compelling content to all their site visitors will be forced to re-code their site multiple times. Publishers without the resources to do so will have to make a tough choice - remove the unsupported content and the media that makes it slow to load on mobile devices entirely? Or leave it be and risk losing their mobile audience instead? That's a "Sophie's Choice" no one wants to make. Unfortunately, in a down economy where money is tight, that may be just what happens.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/npr_and_wsj_building_ipad-only_websites.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/npr_and_wsj_building_ipad-only_websites.php Apple Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:32:51 -0800 Sarah Perez
Prepare for an iPad App Explosion: Developer Activity Up 185% Recent data from mobile analytics firm Flurry shows iPhone OS developer activity has increased by 185% since Apple announced their upcoming slate computing device known as the iPad earlier this year. By measuring new application starts within the Flurry community, the firm was able to determine significant increases in developer activity, including the largest spike ever in their recorded history during the month of January after the announcement occurred. The growth continued in February and now the company reports that a large proportion of the new applications they are seeing are custom version of existing applications tailored specifically for use on the iPad.

]]>Sponsor

]]> When Apple began taking pre-orders for the iPad on Friday, March 12th, the Apple.com website was updated with new information about the device. One of the most significant reveals was that iPad applications would soon have their own dedicated section within the iTunes App Store. The website text reads:

Browse a section of the store that features apps designed specifically for iPad. You'll find hundreds that make the most of its large display, responsive performance, and Multi-Touch interface.

Although current iPhone applications will work on the new Apple device without modifications, developers who want to take advantage of the larger screen could use the updated iPhone SDK (software development kit) to modify their apps in order to release custom iPad-only versions. Now it appears that those who chose to do so will be rewarded for their efforts by having their apps made more visible via this new section of the iTunes Store. Considering that the number of  iPhone apps now in existence is somewhere near 140,000, being able to achieve this increased visibility will allow developers "the opportunity to establish an early presence on this new device and drive more downloads," says Flurry.

iPad_ProjectStartIncreases1.png

Last week, we took a look at some of the iPad applications we're looking forward to, including things like comic books, magazines and games, but there's clearly a lot of others we haven't even anticipated yet. We're only days away from knowing what those will be: Apple's iPad will be available for sale starting April 3rd, and along with its launch, the new iPad App Store will go live as well.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/prepare_for_an_ipad_app_explosion.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/prepare_for_an_ipad_app_explosion.php Apple Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:24:28 -0800 Sarah Perez
Sony Brings More Newspaper and Magazine Content to its E-Readers sony_reader_store_logo_mar09.jpgSony just announced that it is expanding its selection of newspapers and magazines in its e-book store. Starting today, users of Sony's e-readers will be able to subscribe to 20 new newspapers and magazines, including the New York Times, Boston Globe, San Jose Mercury News, PC Magazine and Foreign Affairs. With the newspaper business in turmoil, it only makes sense for these papers to try to get a better foothold on more devices.

]]>Sponsor

]]> eInk vs. LCDs

For users who don't own an e-reader yet but are looking into getting one, the question right now is to either wait for the iPad and go with a regular LCD screen for reading books, or to choose a more traditional (and cheaper) e-reader like the Kindle or Sony Reader that feature electronic ink. While some users don't mind the blacklit LCD screens of their phones to read, others can't fathom reading any long-form content on these screens.

Fighting Off the iPad

For Sony, Amazon, B&N and others who are currently betting on electronic ink for their devices, one of the best ways to distinguish themselves from Apple is to offer more content over their free wireless connections and to play up the advantages of eInk. In this context, adding a newspaper like the New York Times (which is also a favorite of Steve Jobs and features heavily in Apple's iPad ads and other promotional material) makes a lot of sense. For the newspapers, getting on more devices and selling more subscriptions is simply good business. Sony charges up to $14.99 per month for these subscriptions.

Given that all of these papers could sell their own apps and subscriptions on the iPad as well - and that some of them will be available for free - the availability of newspapers may not be a deciding factor for a lot of potential iPad and e-reader buyers. Hopefully, however, we will also see a lot of innovative newspaper and magazine apps on the iPad. Chances are that these new apps will make today's traditional e-readers seem rather quaint in comparison. The availability of these apps could easily sway a lot of potential e-reader buyers to get an iPad instead.

What is your experience? Do you think e-books and newspapers just look better on eInk? Or are you waiting for the innovative newspaper apps on the iPad that will include video and other interactive content?

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sony_brings_more_newspaper_and_magazine_content_to.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sony_brings_more_newspaper_and_magazine_content_to.php E-Books Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:00:03 -0800 Frederic Lardinois
Does HTML5 Really Beat Flash? The Surprising Results of New Tests With the impending launch of the Apple iPad, the Cupertino-based company's shunning of Adobe Flash technology has been brought to the forefront of technological discussions. While it was one thing to forgo Flash on a small, mobile device such as the iPhone or iPod Touch, some are questioning whether lack of Flash support is going to be a make-it-or-break it feature for the new slate devices arriving next month - devices which, if you believe Apple CEO Steve Jobs - are "better than netbooks."

On the flip side, Apple supporters echo the company's sentiments that "Flash is a CPU hog" and including support for the technology in Apple's mobile line-up would negatively impact battery life.

]]>Sponsor

]]> However, recent tests have put Flash up against HTML5, the new web markup language that eliminates the need for the Adobe plugin. The results of these tests show that this is not a simple black-and-white issue. Is Flash really a CPU hog? Yes, in some cases. But, surprisingly, not all the time. In fact, sometimes HTML5 actually performed worse.

Testing Flash and HTML5

Jan Ozer is an expert in video encoding technologies, has worked in digital video since 1990 and is the author of 13 books related to the subject [Editor's Note: some people have pointed out that Ozer has done seminars and written books featuring Adobe products, so therefore he makes money from the success of Adobe Flash. We don't think that has any effect on the test outcomes, but we thought it was worth updating the post to note it.] Recently, he put HTML5 up against Flash in a series of tests that pitted the two technologies against each other on both the Mac and PC and in different web browsers including Internet Explorer 8, Google Chrome, Apple Safari and Mozilla Firefox.

The results of the tests in their entirety are published here on StreamingLearningCenter.com. The summary in a nutshell? Flash isn't always a CPU hog, sometimes that honor goes to HTML5.

Some of the highlights of Ozer's findings are below, broken up into both Mac and Windows test results.

Mac Tests

  • With Safari, HTML5 was the most efficient and consumed less CPU than Flash using only 12.39% CPU. With Flash 10.0, CPU utilization was at 37.41% and with Flash 10.1, it dropped to 32.07%
  • With Google Chrome, Flash and HTML5 were both equally inefficient (both are around 50%)
  • With Firefox, Flash was only slightly less efficient than in Safari, but better than in Chrome

Windows Tests

  • Safari wouldn't play HTML5 videos, so there was no way to test that. However, Flash 10.0 used 23.22% CPU but Flash 10.1 only used 7.43% CPU
  • Google Chrome was more efficient on Windows than Mac. Playback with Flash Player 10.0 was about 24% more efficient than HTML5, while Flash Player 10.1 was 58% more efficient than HTML5.
  • On Firefox, Flash 10.1 dropped CPU utilization to 6% from 22% in Flash 10.0
  • In IE8, Flash 10.0 used 22.41% CPU and Flash 10.1 used 14.62% CPU

Hardware Acceleration Key to Flash Performance

In analyzing the results of the tests, Ozer determined that the key to better Flash performance was dependent upon whether or not it could access hardware acceleration. This feature, launched in Flash 10.1, allows the plugin to use the graphics processing unit (GPU) on some computers to decode video. Depending on the video card and drivers, (NVIDIA, AMD/ATI and Intel offer products that support this), the video decoding process in Flash 10.1 can now work for all video playback, not just full-screen playback as was available in Flash 10.0.

According to Adobe, hardware acceleration is not supported under either Linux or Mac OS X, the latter because Mac OS X does not expose access to the required APIs. Adobe goes on to say "The Flash Player team will continue to evaluate adding hardware acceleration to Linux and Mac OS X in future releases."

Here's what this all means in layman's terms: Apple isn't allowing Flash to become more efficient on their Mac OS X/Safari platform (or their iPod/iPhone/iPad one, either) by not providing the access to the hardware it needs to reduce its CPU load. Adobe is waiting and watching to see if they do, but, as Ozer says "the ball is in Apple's court."

Will Apple budge? At this point, it's unlikely. In blocking Flash on Apple devices, the company can easily claim that it's simply not an efficient technology...and that's true for now, considering how it's set up. But if the company wanted to allow it and make it work, it seems reasonable to believe that they could. This is what leads some insiders to believe that the decision to block Flash is less of a technological one and more of a business-minded one. After all, if you could easily visit Hulu.com to stream TV shows and movies, then why would you need to buy them from the iTunes Store?

So while Flash's "CPU hogging" may be a contributing factor in Apple's decision to not support the technology on their mobile devices, that's probably not the only reason behind the block.

Thank you to Dan Rayburn, who pointed us to Jan Ozer's article.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/does_html5_really_beat_flash_surprising_results_of_new_tests.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/does_html5_really_beat_flash_surprising_results_of_new_tests.php Adobe Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:16:50 -0800 Sarah Perez
Who Wants an iPad? The Young, the Social & the Pop-Culture Addicts Social media data company Rapleaf recently investigated the profiles of users who "fanned" the iPad on Facebook in order to get a better sense of the type of users who are interested in Apple's upcoming slate device. After analyzing the top three Facebook pages and their respective fanbases, Rapleaf discovered that there were some common themes among these users. The prospective iPad buyers on Facebook are young - much younger than the overall Facebook population, in fact.
They're also fairly social, with nearly a third of the fans having over 300 friends. And finally, iPad fans are also very interested in other pop culture activities and themes including various celebs, brands and internet memes.

]]>Sponsor

]]> To make these determinations, Rapleaf looked at the top three iPad fan pages on Facebook. At the time of their study, these were: The iPad (#1) (69,293 fans), The iPad (#2) (23,637 fans) and The iPad (#3)  (5,009 fans).

There weren't any major variations in gender differences among the iPad fans. Although the second page skewed more female and the third page skewed more male, the overall numbers balanced out to a fairly even split.

However, when Rapleaf delved into the ages of the fans, they discovered that iPad fans were a lot younger than your typical Facebook user. While 61% of the U.S. Facebook market is under 35, nearly 50% of the iPad fans were between 18 and 25. You can see the differences between the pages and Facebook in general (U.S. only) plotted on the chart here.

facebook fans of ipad.png

Apple iPad fans are also rather social, with 33% having over 300 friends on Facebook and 8% with more than 500 friends. Additionally, perhaps due to their age, a lot of the iPad fans were fans of other pop culture themes like favorite celebs, brands and memes. By analyzing the top 100 other fan pages of these users, Rapleaf discovered interests like Starbucks, Megan Fox, Coca-Cola, Michael Jackson, YouTube, Will Smith, Twilight, Lady Gaga, pizza, and other various Facebook "memes" like "Pants on the Ground," random laughter, "I need a vacation" and "I really hate slow computers," (the last being a problem the iPad hopes to solve, incidentally).

iPad for the Young?

What does this tell us about the market for Apple's new device? Mainly that it has a lot of youth appeal, apparently. While some have predicted the iPad is the sort of computer that your "mom" will use - implying that the iPad is a sort of computer for non-computer users - it appears that "mom" isn't actually a top demographic among the iPad's Facebook fans. But then again, you can't read too much into that finding - after all, "mom" (the older Facebook user) may not even know how to fan things on Facebook yet or she may simply not be interested in doing so. But the study does at least solidify that there is quite a bit of iPad interest out there among the youngest tech users, something that bodes well for the device's adoption.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/who_wants_an_ipad_the_young_the_social_the_pop-culture_addicts.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/who_wants_an_ipad_the_young_the_social_the_pop-culture_addicts.php Analysis Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:46:22 -0800 Sarah Perez
iPad Arrives April 3rd: 8 Apps We Can't Wait to Try News from Cupertino, California this morning has Apple fans in a tizzy: the "magical and revolutionary" (yes, that's really how Apple describes it) iPad now has a confirmed launch date. According to an Apple press release, the iPad will be available in the U.S. on Saturday, April 3rd in Wi-Fi only models and later that month in 3G. Also by month-end, all editions of the iPad will become available in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, Switzerland and the U.K. Pre-orders will start March 12th on www.apple.com.

Although we know that many people are already confirmed buyers, there are a lot of fence-sitters out there still wondering why they need an iPad when they already have an iPhone (or iPod Touch, or netbook, or laptop, etc.). If that's you, we've come up with a list of confirmed iPad apps that may convince you otherwise.

]]>Sponsor

]]> 1) The New York Times

No surprise here. The NY Times was actually one of the applications demonstrated during the iPad announcement in January. Their native application lets you save stories, watch video, zoom in and out on photos and virtually "flip" through the paper without dirtying up your fingers with newsprint. The news stories are updated whenever the device has an internet connection.

2) The Wall St. Journal

We haven't seen it in action yet, but News Corp.'s Rupert Murdoch has apparently been telling people that there's an iPad under lock-and-key in the WSJ's building. "We've been allowed to work on one," he told members of the Real Estate Board of New York during a luncheon this past week. We imagine its features will be very much on par with those in the NY Times app, as described above.

3) Need for Speed Shift (Game)

The iPad represents a whole new gaming platform. It's a handheld device like the iPhone, but one with a much larger screen. That means video games will look great - more like games you play on your TV via game consoles like the Xbox 360, PS3 or Wii. Electronic Arts is one of the first to develop for the iPad and their "Need for Speed Shift" racing game, also demoed during Apple's announcement, has been redesigned from the iPhone version into one just for the iPad. They've scaled up the images to fit the larger screen and the results, from what we've seen so far, look great.

4) Penguin Books

Penguin CEO John Makinson spoke to a London audience this past week about his company's plans to build iPad-ready books. Instead of releasing text-only publications, Penguin books will be more like apps including embedded video, audio and streaming. "The .ePub format, which is the standard for ebooks at the present, is designed to support traditional narrative text," said Makinson, "but not this cool stuff that we're now talking about. So for the time being at least we'll be creating a lot of our content as applications, for sale on app stores and HTML, rather than in ebooks. The definition of the book itself is up for grabs."

5) Condé Nast Magazines: Wired, GQ, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, and Glamour

Enjoy magazines but hate how they clutter up your house? That will never be a problem again thanks to the iPad. According to the NY Times, the large publishing firm has big plans for their periodicals. GQ will have a tablet version of its April issue ready. Vanity Fair and Wired will follow with their June issues, and The New Yorker and Glamour will have issues in the summer. Already, the company's iPhone application for GQ that proves Condé Nast gets how to develop for new platforms. The GQ app is not a simple digitized magazine, but includes features that embrace the mobile web. For example, you can tap through on an ad to go to a company's website or tap a song in a music review to download it.

Wired, specifically, gave us all a look at their iPad app earlier this month and it's incredible. Although they actually called it their "tablet" app - Wired isn't limiting themselves to one platform - we know one of the first places we'll see it is Apple's new slate device.

6) Your Student Newspaper

In addition to the big names like the NY Times and WSJ, colleges will also begin to use the iPad for distributing their highly localized news. One college, Abilene Christian University, has already confirmed they've developed an app for their paper, "The Optimist." "We want to be up and running and there when they're ready for us," said Professor Kenneth Pybus. You can bet they won't be the last college to launch for iPad, either.

7) Disney iPad Apps

Walt Disney's Robert Iger recently informed investors that Disney will develop all sorts of iPad applications that will range from games to digital books and who knows what else? "We find that the iPad has a lot of potential. We think it's a really compelling device," he said. Iger also predicts that the iPad will be "a game-changer in terms of enabling us to create essentially new forms of content." We can't wait to see what the creatives at Disney come up with.

Also of note: Disney owns Marvel Comics and that has some speculating that comic book apps are on the list of soon-to-arrive Disney iPad apps.

8) iPhone Apps, Transformed

Although iPhone apps will work on the iPad without any updates required, developers who want to redesign their iPhone apps specifically for the iPad can do so.

For an example of how great these will look when they do this, check out 1Password. Already available as an iPhone app, this app helps you create strong passwords for web services and accounts, remembers them for you and stores them right in your browser. Their iPad app, shown off on their blog here, shows just how attractive - oh, we'll say it - just downright gorgeous - iPad apps will be.

1password.jpg

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ipad_arrives_april_3rd_8_apps_we_cant_wait_to_try.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ipad_arrives_april_3rd_8_apps_we_cant_wait_to_try.php Apple Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:59:25 -0800 Sarah Perez
SXSW 2010 for Hackers A ReadWriteWeb Guide

SXSW 2010 hacker hackathonSouth by Southwest Interactive is a favorite conference for many a geeky programmer, and its no wonder why. The talent, learning opportunities and free booze run deep and wide at this show.

We've compiled a list of ten must-see, must-do panels, parties and events - and don't worry, we won't be sending you to three identical core conversations on JavaScript.

From Google's Hackathon to Facebook's Developer Garage and beyond, you'll get to learn from (and drink with) some of the greatest minds behind the greatest companies of the Web.

]]>Sponsor

]]> This is part of a series of ReadWriteWeb guides to SXSW Interactive 2010. If this guide isn't your cup of tea, be sure to check back for more information soon!

SXSW SXSWi 2010 hacker hackathonRevenge Of Kick-Ass Mash-Ups with Punk Rock APIs

"Last time we wrote an API layer for a dozen different sites and services, using nothing but free online tools and client-side JavaScript. This time we'll crack into client-side OAuth. This time actual working code WILL BE WRITTEN BY YOU. This time ... it's personal." With Kent Brewster of Netflix.

SXSW SXSWi 2010 nhacker hackathonCoding for Pleasure: Developing Killer Spare-Time Apps

"Every startup origin story is about a couple of developers who abscond to a garage and end up building the Next Big Thing. But money and fame don't need to be your end goal. You can significantly improve your life--and impact others' lives--by coding for pleasure in your spare time." With Gina Trapani, Adam Pash of Lifehacker and Matt Haughey of MetaFilter.

SXSW SXSWi 2010 hacker hackathonMozilla SXSW Happy Hour

"Join us for happy hour drinks and appetizers at Cedar Door and learn what we are working on at Mozilla. Party is limited to the first 250 guests who arrive - please RSVP on Facebook: http://bit.ly/mozsxswparty!"

SXSW SXSWi 2010 hacker hackathonWeb Framework Battle Royale

"Which web framework will rule them all? As an audience member you pick the winner! We will present an introduction to a variety of web frameworks including Rails, Django, Catalyst, and Sinatra. You can vote for the best web framework in categories such as URL handling, database integration, forms, HTML templating, documentation, testing and deployment." With Yehuda Katz of Engine Yard, Leah Culver of Six Apart, Elizabeth Leddy of Janus Health, Blake Mizerany of Heroku, Avi Bryant of Dabble DB and Dustin Whittle of Yahoo.

SXSW SXSWi 2010 hacker hackathonThe Hive Awards

"The Hive Awards honor the Unsung Heroes of the Internet. The people who do the heavy lifting but rarely get any credit. Drinks, hors d'oeuvres, free admission." Sponsored by KickApps.

SXSW SXSWi 2010 hacker hackathonFacebook Developer Garage Austin - SXSW Edition

"Join the Facebook team and local developers for a deep dive into the latest and most exciting ways developers are building with Facebook technologies. Come to learn, stay to make friends! http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=331218348435"

SXSW SXSWi 2010 hacker hackathonBeyond LAMP: Scaling Websites Past MySQL

"Most startups begin with a basic LAMP stack (on PHP or Python) and then add database replication and memcache as they grow. But then what? There's a big gap between these out-of-the-box solutions and what it takes to run something bigger." With Serkan Piantino of Facebook, Alan Schaaf of Imgur, Kevin Weil of Twitter, Christopher Slowe of Reddit and Jason Kincaid of TechCrunch.

SXSW SXSWi 2010 hacker hackathonObjective C Crash Course for Web Developers

"Build your first iPhone app in 60 minutes flat. Along the way, you'll tour Apple's developer tools and learn the basics of the Cocoa Touch framework. Discover how to use your PHP and JavaScript experience for an informed approach to coding iPhone apps. Apply familiar JavaScript design patterns, for example, to handle interface programming in Objective-C." With Joris Verbogt of Mangrove.

If Objective-C isn't your bag, why not try Hold the Cocoa: Building iPhone Apps with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript and learn how to build iPhone apps "without ever touching Objective-C."

SXSW SXSWi 2010 hacker hackathonWow, That's Cool... Fun With HTML5 Video

"Using the video tag in HTML5, developers can do all sorts of things that are hard or impossible with plugins. In this presentation, Mozilla will show the best and most interesting hacks entered into OVA's Open Video Contest - because when the webmonkeys unleash their creativity, things get interesting." With Michael Dale of Kaltura Wikimedia and Christopher Blizzard of Mozilla.

SXSW SXSWi 2010 hacker hackathonGoogle Hackathon

"The Google Hackathon hosted by Google will provide a hands-on workshop throughout the day where attendees will be able to build apps using a variety of Google technologies including App Engine, HTML5, Android, Chrome, and Maps/Geo technologies. Although the hackathon will run all day long (from 9:30-7:00pm), we'll be providing short 20 minute "deep dive" presentations on specific topics covered in the hands-on exercises. This panel is sponsored by Google."

Those are our SXSW Interaction recommendations for hackers of all stripes. If you've got suggestions or feedback, let us know in the comments! See you in Austin, folks!

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sxsw_2010_for_hackers.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sxsw_2010_for_hackers.php SXSW 2010 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:21:39 -0800 Jolie O'Dell
iPad Owners to Go Wi-Fi Only? AT&T CEO Thinks So (POLL) When consumers rush out to purchase Apple's new handheld device, the slate-like computer called the iPad, they'll have several options to choose from. In addition to multiple storage capacities, iPad buyers will have to make an even more critical decision: Wi-Fi or 3G? Although Wi-Fi hotspots are in many places these days, from airports to coffee shops and sometimes even blanketing a city's downtown, anyone with an iPod Touch will tell you that they're far from being everywhere. That problem certainly limits some of the functionality of the iPad apps, especially those relying on real-time updates for breaking news, data downloads or other Internet-only content.
Considering that the contract-free iPad 3G plan starts at $15 per month, one would think that, given these potential issues, the 3G version would be the top choice among consumers. However, AT&T's CEO thinks otherwise. He predicts the iPad will primarily be a Wi-Fi only device. Is he right?

]]>Sponsor

]]> Too Many Subscriptions

According to a Reuters report, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson says he doesn't expect the iPad's launch to lead to very many new AT&T service subscriptions. "My expectation is that there's not going to be a lot of people out there looking for another subscription," he was quoted as saying.

He may be right. As consumers, we're starting to hit a saturation point with how many times we have to pay - again and again - for access to the same Internet. We have our broadband bill for at home, a mobile broadband bill for our laptop's "air card" and a third bill for our phone's data plan. Layer on top of that the numerous subscription services for Internet-accessible content, like Xbox LIVE, Netflix (via their "Watch Instantly" service) and premium music streaming sites like Pandora, Spotify or Last.fm, and it's clear that we've become overloaded. Will anyone out there be able to afford yet another wireless data plan? Apparently, AT&T isn't counting on it.

Will You be Missing Out?

If you plan to use the iPad mainly as an eBook reader and portable media device for streaming iTunes-purchased content, then you won't miss out too much when you go offline, which - let's face it - when you leave the house, that will be most of the time. The majority of iPhone games, all of which will work on the iPad out-of-the-box, won't be affected either. But what about when you want to read the newspaper or a magazine via the iPad? Without an Internet connection to download the latest, you'll be stuck with yesterday's news or last month's edition of Wired. And if you wanted to quickly share something you read on Facebook or Twitter, you would be out of luck, here, too.

However, many people may be willing to live with these limitations. Just as we've learned to sync our iPods and iPhones before we leave the house, we may soon need to remember to update our online newspaper and magazine apps, too. For this minor inconvenience, there's a major payoff: the monthly savings, of course, but also hundreds of dollars off the retail price of the iPad.

In any event, we wonder if AT&T's CEO has any insight into this situation or if he will be surprised by how popular the 3G iPad ends up being. Do you agree with his prediction? Lets find out! Take our poll (linked below) to tell us what iPad you'll buy. (If you're not buying an iPad, then just skip it!)

NY Times readers, click here to access the poll.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ipad_owners_to_go_wi-fi_only_att_ceo_says_yes_poll.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ipad_owners_to_go_wi-fi_only_att_ceo_says_yes_poll.php Apple Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:55:45 -0800 Sarah Perez
Companies on Wikipedia: Apple's Fans Get it Right lundquist_logo_feb09.jpgAccording to a new study by Milan-based consultancy firm Lundquist, Apple has the best Wikipedia entry among Fortune Global 500 companies. Lundquist ranked Wikipedia pages according to the quality of the data in the infobox, page features like links and citations and the quality and availability of page sections like company history and charts.

Today, 489 out of the Global 500 companies are featured on Wikipedia, though the majority of companies scored very low on Lundquist's scale. The average score was just 11 out of a possible 25 points. Apple's entry scored 22 points.

]]>Sponsor

]]>

Top Wikipedia Pages

  • Apple (22 pts)
  • BT (21.5 pts)
  • Nokia (21 pts)
  • Royal Dutch Shell (21 pts)
  • Ford Motor (20.5 pts)
  • Toyota Motor (20.5 pts)
  • BAE Systems (20 pts)
  • Bank of America (20 pts)
  • BP (20 pts)
  • Dell (20 pts)
  • Wikipedia is one of the first entry points for Internet users who are looking for more information about a company. A lot of companies score very low on Lundquist's scale, however. Quite a few entries, for example, don't even mention what geographic area the company serves or display any data bout the company's board members or number of employees. According to the company's researchers, entries for companies in the computer and IT services industry have the highest average score, while the entries for pharmaceutical and health care companies rank the lowest.

    According to Lundquist, Sumitomo Electric Industries and the French financial services group Crédit Industriel & Commercial have the worst Wikipedia pages of all the Global Fortune 500 companies.

    What Can Companies Do to Improve Their Pages?

    As the report's authors point out, companies are strongly discouraged from editing their own articles on Wikipedia. There are some things, however, that these companies can do to enhance their entries. Here are three recommendations from the report, which don't just apply to large companies:

    • respect the rules of Wikipedia
    • make copyright-free images available to the Wikipedia community
    • only edit factual information like quarterly results or management changes (Wikipedia actually encourages companies to do this, though it's probably best to explain the edit in detail)
    • use discussion pages to interact with editors
    • engage and help editors who are interested in the company or the company's products
    • monitor your company's Wikipedia article for updates and vandalism
    ]]>Discuss]]> http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/companies_on_wikipedia_apple_bt_nokia.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/companies_on_wikipedia_apple_bt_nokia.php News Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:15:56 -0800 Frederic Lardinois Wikitude Brings Augmented "Worlds" to the iPhone In January, the Austria-based company Mobilizy updated the Android version of its mobile augmented reality browser Wikitude to include a new feature they dubbed "Worlds," which are similar to the layers found in the alternatively popular Layar AR browser. On Thursday Wikitude 2.0 for the iPhone (version 4 on Android) was released on the iTunes App Store, brining these new Worlds to the iPhone.

    ]]>Sponsor

    ]]> Previously, Wikitude only served up geo-tagged Wikipedia articles, or content created on the Wikitude.me online service. With the addition of Worlds, users can now also browse locally for Twitter posts, Flickr photos and YouTube videos - the usual AR suspects. Also, local search points-of-interest (POI) are available through Google Local Search, CitySearch and Qype, but actual search functionality is not included.

    This new verison of Wikitude also marks the browser's first commercial entries as users can find the nearest Startbucks, Walmart, Harley Davidson or BestBuy locations using the various World filters found on the applications new "Overview" home screen. Some of the Worlds, such as Last.fm events, Meetup Events and Outside.in content, are unique to Wikitude and are innovative inclusions for AR browsing.

    First released for Android phones in October of 2008, Wikitude was the very first mobile augmented reality browser to hit the market. Since then Layar, acrossair and hundreds of other mobile AR apps have upped the ante in the mobile AR space, and the latest iteration of Wikitude is in direct response to this competition.

    Wikitude's updated features follow a continuing trend in mobile AR to consolidate a group of applications into a single AR browser-like experience. Mobilizy previously produced the AR application C2 YouTube for the iPhone, but has moved that functionality into Wikitude.

    Additionally, acrossair's AR browser now includes features like Twitter and Wikipedia entries, which were previously features in their own independent applications. French iPhone app development house Presselite, which made waves with its Metro Paris Subway app, and other transit applications, has since rolled its applications together into the Bionic Eye application. It's only a matter of time before these companies begin rolling games and entertainment, a growing AR sector, into their browsers for one-stop augmented reality experiences.

    Mobilizy, Layar, acrossair, and Presselite now have comparable AR browsing applications with Tonchidot not far behind with its more social app, Sekai Camera, the most popular AR app in Japan. Competition is certainly a good thing when it comes to mobile AR, and the deal-breaker in the coming months and years for most users will likely be the commercial content found on the applications.

    Which mobile AR application do you like best? Let us know what you think in the comments.

    ]]>Discuss]]>
    http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wikitude_brings_augmented_worlds_to_the_iphone.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/wikitude_brings_augmented_worlds_to_the_iphone.php Augmented Reality Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:30:00 -0800 Chris Cameron
    Finally! 'Find in Page' Comes to Mobile Safari What important Web browsing feature is sorely missing from mobile Safari, the iPhone's built-in browser? If you're like us, you probably said the ability to search for text within a Web page. We're accustomed to using this feature in the grown-up Web browsers on our desktop and laptop machines, but sadly, it's lacking when we switch over to the mini-browser built into our mobile phone.

    Until now, that is. In yet another case of "there's an app for that," there is, in fact, a new iPhone application that adds the "find within a page" feature to the iPhone browser. And it's well worth the $0.99 fee to finally have this function at our disposal again.

    ]]>Sponsor

    ]]> Find in Page for iPhone

    The application "Find in Page" (iTunes URL), which was released last month in the iTunes App Store, is essentially a browser bookmarklet that adds an extra feature to mobile Safari. Not only does "Find in Page" locate all instances of a word within the displayed Web page upon launch, it also counts them, highlights them and lets you move from once instance to the next (and back again) by tapping arrow buttons. Of course, there are other free bookmarklets out there that provide similar functionality, but this one feels very much like a part of mobile Safari itself. It feels built-in.

    The key differentiating factor that makes this pseudo plugin stand out from the rest is the semi-transparent toolbar that appears at the bottom of the screen once the bookmarklet is activated. From here, you can access the arrow buttons, word count information and you can pull up the search window again if you want to edit your current search or start a new one. Also, if you perform multiple searches, you can do so without having to reload the page - a definite time-saver. Finally, an "X" button closes the toolbar when you're finished.

    Although this small application may not sound as exciting as a revolutionary new feed reader or a brand-new interface for Facebook, it's arguably going to be one of the most useful applications you've ever installed on your iPhone. For that reason, we think it's well worth the $0.99 the developer is charging for the app. We've certainly paid far more for applications we've used much less than this. However, for those of you who balk at paying anything for apps, especially for ones that are essentially just a bit of code, you'll be happy to know that a free "lite" version of this tool will be coming mid-month. Stay tuned to the App Store for its release. Otherwise, you can grab the paid version here.

    ]]>Discuss]]>
    http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_find_in_page_comes_to_mobile_safari.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_find_in_page_comes_to_mobile_safari.php Apple Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:54:49 -0800 Sarah Perez
    iPad Gets No Consumer Love? (POLL) A new survey from Retrevo finds that consumers' interest in the Apple iPad died down after they heard what the new tablet PC actually had to offer. According to the company, "not only did Apple fail to convince new buyers, it may have lost many potential buyers who now say they don't think they need an Apple tablet computer." Ouch!

    While it's true that the poll results do support these findings, they contradict what tech analysts have been saying about the device's potential. With sales expectations that range anywhere from 1 million to 6 million units over the course of this year, the iPad is predicted to do quite well. So is the survey wrong? Or is it the analysts?

    ]]>Sponsor

    ]]> iPad Reality Disappoints?

    The Apple iPad has the dubious glory of being one of the most over-hyped, hotly anticipated tech products of the year. Rumors surrounding the device prior to its launch had the tablet computer offering everything from OLED to multiple cameras to an innovative multi-touch enabled back. The reality was a much simpler device that looked more like a big iPod than the revolutionary product so many had built up in their minds.

    But will this let-down in expectations actually lead to fewer sales? If you believe the Retrevo survey, that could easily be the case. The percentage of consumers who had heard about the iPad but were not interested in buying one jumped from 26% prior to Apple's announcement to 52% afterwards. Also, people who claimed they don't need an iPad went from 49% to 61%. That certainly sounds like bad news for Apple, doesn't it?

    Survey Says: Marketing Stunt!

    Well not so fast. Let's keep in mind that Retrevo likes to put out these sorts of link-baiting surveys from time to time. For example, a prior survey found that iPhone owners were materialistic and fickle people. (Who couldn't write about that?) We probably should just ignore these publicity stunts... err... surveys, but this one was begging to be shot down... or shored up, we suppose. After all, their survey phrases questions in a way that almost guarantees a negative response. Case in point: "do you need an iPad?" No one really needs an iPad. Not surprisingly, many people said "no." We need water, food, shelter and clothing. Once our basic needs are met, we then focus on obtaining other "needs" like a job, a car, an education, etc. The iPad, however, is something we want. We already have a computer. Maybe even a computer, a netbook and an iPod or iPhone. We can't in all honesty say we need an iPad. It may seem like a simple turn of phrase, but when crafting survey questions, word choice is important.

    Will You Buy an iPad?

    So instead of going by Retrevo's findings, we'll ask you instead. Will you buy the iPad? Will you rush right out and get one as soon as it hits store shelves? Or will you wait patiently for iPad 2.0? Or are you not interested at all? Now's your chance to weigh in and prove Retrevo's numbers wrong... or right, as the case may be. Just answer the question in the poll below:

    ]]>Discuss]]>
    http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ipad_gets_no_consumer_love_poll.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ipad_gets_no_consumer_love_poll.php Apple Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:56:44 -0800 Sarah Perez
    Analysts on the iPad: It's a Winner After being saturated with blog posts from every blogger, tech pundit and average Joe about Apple's newest entry into the tablet PC game, the iPad, we finally decided to seek out the opinions of those who know best (well, sometimes, that is): the tech analysts. Numerous sites have quoted from this analyst or that and a few have even done round-ups of their own, but we never found a comprehensive resource providing all the analyst opinions in one post. So we made our own.

    ]]>Sponsor

    ]]> Below, we've combined all the analysts' statements and estimates into one massive read. And after going through everything that's been said, we discovered that the collective opinion of the analyst industry is that Apple has a definite winner on their hands.

    The iPad Will Sell

    Thanks to Barrons, we found a round-up of analyst estimates regarding iPad sales. We've taken their post and re-listed the quotes below from lowest to highest. The end result? Sales could be anywhere from 1 million to 6 million. No matter what the number, that's not too shabby.

    • Yair Reiner, Oppenheimer: 1.1 million units in FY10 and 4M units in FY11
    • Scott Craig, Bank of America/Merrill Lynch: He forecasts Apple to ship 1.25 million units in FY 2010 and 3.75 million in FY 2011.
    • Keith Bachman, BMO Capital: He projects 2.5 million iPad units in FY 2010 and 5.5 million units in FY 2011.
    • Ben Reitzes, Barclays Capital:  Forecasts iPad sales of 2.9 million in FY 2010 and 7.3 million in FY '11.
    • Gene Munster, Piper Jaffray: 2010 sales of 3-4 million units, expects 2011 to be the break out year, with 8 million units
    • David Bailey, Goldman Sachs: 6 million iPad units in 2010
    • Katy Huberty, Morgan Stanley: CY2010 unit forecast 6 million; CY 2011 forecast is 9 million units

    When the Apps Arrive, iPad Will Impress the Doubters

    Some of the negativity surrounding the iPad has to do with its limited functionality. No multitasking? No Flash? No camera? But as the analysts below point out, when it comes to the iPad, we ain't seen nothin' yet. Once developers start releasing their iPad apps, the device will seem a lot more impressive than it does now.

    Charlie Wolf, Needham & Company:

    Wolf said the iPad is "another winner" from Apple but people won't realize its potential until developers create iPad apps. "The iPad is not a revolutionary product. But it has the potential to become one once the creative juices of content providers are unleashed...The $500 starting price point is low enough to attract a sizable portion of the early adopter crowd, consisting of iPhone and iPod owners...Our best guess at this time is the Apple could sell four million iPads in its initial year on the market, which translates into at least $2 billion of revenue" (Source: AppleInsider & AllThingsD)

    Tavis McCourt, Morgan Keegan:

    "We suspect initial sales will be strong (this is Apple, and there are many enthusiasts), and then simmer down a bit after a few months. The ultimate success of a new product category will be the unique apps developed for this device, and with the SDK just going out today, it is hard to know how impressive they will be. However, the good news is that aside from maybe modest iPod Touch cannibalization, we doubt that the iPad will cannibalize any revenues from the massive margin pools within the iPhone and Mac product categories." (Source AllThingsD)

    It's a Great Casual Gaming Device

    Like the iPod Touch and iPhone, the iPad will attract casual gamers and game developers to its platform. However, the iPad won't be considered a serious gaming device by the community. One analyst even claims it won't generate significant revenue for developers.

    Michael Pachter, Wedbush Morgan:

    Pachter thinks the tablet will appeal to the casual gaming community. "I think the early offerings on the tablet will be a lot closer to iPod Touch/iPhone style games, and then probably morph into DS kind of games and then ultimately will morph into PSP quality games. The core audience is probably more of a casual game audience than a hardcore audience. So the one device I think will suffer from the introduction on the games side is the DS. And you're going to see a lot of cross-fertilization of games between the iPod Touch, iPhone and the tablet, so I actually see the iPod Touch benefiting from that." (Source: TGDaily.com)

    Jesse Divnich, EEDAR:

    Divnich thinks the iPad won't appeal to serious gamers. "The iPad has limited functionality and limited controls and will not be taken seriously as a gaming platform from the industry...all publishers will support the iPad, as they do with the iPhone, but I do not expect any publisher to realize a significant amount of revenue from the iPhone/iPad platforms, which means that their iPhone games will have play a supporting role to an overall brand...EA doesn't expect Sims 3 for the iPhone to be a cash cow; however, they do expect that consumers enjoy the iPhone version and then purchase the PC or console branded Sims games." (Source: TGDaily.com)

    But We're Surprised there's no Verizon Deal

    Some analysts reported they were "shocked" by the lack of a Verizon deal. So were we. Larsen from Piper Jaffray speculates as to why that may be - GSM. Here at ReadWriteWeb, we're hoping the delay is because Apple wants to surprise us with the news at their next big event where they announce iPhone OS 4.0.

    Allen Weiner, Gartner Inc.:

    "The choice to leave out Verizon was a surprise, given that AT&T has faced complaints from consumers that its network is overloaded by the iPhone...AT&T is going to need to make some sort of statement or some sort of acknowledgement that they're up to the test of supporting this." (Source: Business Week)

    Chris Larsen, Piper Jaffray:

    The choice of AT&T is probably due to GSM, the cellular tech used in large markets outside the U.S. including Europe. "If you can pick one device that you can ship everywhere, you're going to bring down your manufacturing costs, you're going to bring down your shipping costs. Verizon is going to be at a disadvantage." Larsen predicts the iPad may generate $100 million in earnings a year for AT&T. (Source: Business Week)

    The iPad is Just a Big iPod Touch?

    Of course, in any round-up, there are going to be a few nay-sayers. The analysts below basically called the iPad a big iPod Touch. While their reviews aren't necessarily out-and-out pans, they're not as head-over-heels with the device as others have been.

    James McQuivey, Forrester:

    McQuivey thinks the iPad could be a miss. "The iPad is a grown-up iPod Touch. Apple has taken the safe route of offering its existing customers an option that goes beyond today's iPod Touch in size and capability, but it has not offered a new category of devices that tackles the five-six hours of media we each consume every day. With no integrated social media for sharing photos, recommending books and sharing home video, the iPad misses a big piece of what makes media so powerful. As it stands, a quick, well-structured response from Amazon in the next version of Kindle could easily be a contender here." (Source: AdWeek)

    Gene Munster, Piper Jaffray:

    "Originally we were estimating sales of 2m units in the first calendar year at a price point of $600-$800. With the actual $499/$629 price point, we believe Apple will sell 3m-4m units in the first 12 months....After using the iPad, we believe it will cannibalize iPod touch sales, but not Mac sales. The gadget is a premium mobile device, not a computer; as such, we see some iPod touch buyers stepping up to the iPad, but consumers looking for an affordable portable computer will likely stick with the MacBook lineup." (Source AllThingsD)

    Richard Gardner, Citigroup:

    "Looks essentially like a super-sized iPod Touch...Investors are extrapolating that unit estimates could be materially higher than expected given the $499 base price. The flip side is that the low price point together with overlapping features does increase the risk of cannibalization of iPod touch sales." (Source: Barrons)

    Analysts are Generally Impressed

    Still, at the end of the day, most analysts - especially those who got some hands on time with the device - walked away impressed. Although some of the reviews acknowledged the various disappointments regarding lack of features or functionality, the long-term view for the iPad is positive.

    Mike Abramsky, RBC Capital Markets:

    "With iPad, Apple creates a revolutionary e-reading, browsing, media, gaming experience. Newspapers, Web pages, books 'come alive' with video, animation, color and fullscreen touch." And as for the mixed reaction in the tech community? "Not everyone initially liked the Ten Commandments either -- but they endured." Although he did find the lack of a camera, multitasking and no Verizon option disappointing, he said the simplicity of the device is its greatest strength. He forecast first-year sales of 5 million, adding 30 cents earnings per share to AAPL stock with an average iPad selling price of $600. (Source: AppleInsider)

    Shaw Wu, Kaufman Bros.:

    Wu thinks the Wi-Fi only version will be the best seller because of the $130 premium for the 3G version. After hands on time with the device, he was impressed. "We see iPad as a new product category that is superior as a shared device in a group setting (such as a living room or meeting) or as an ultra-portable computer. Sure, there could be some cannibalization, but it doesn't quite replicate the functionality or form factor of either device." (Source: AppleInsider)

    Craig Moffett, Bernstein Research:

    "Longer term, the iPad offers the potential to redefine the boundaries between print and video, turning formerly passive media into active ones, and in the process making what are currently low bandwidth applications (say, reading a newspaper) become much more bandwidth intensive (e.g. by embedding video rather than still pictures)." (Source AllThingsD)

    Mark Moskowitz, J.P. Morgan

    "iPad is not for everyone, and the first-generation product is sure to have its critics given the prelaunch buzz. In our view, the iPad is a smart, nimble device for heavy content users-Apple's core customer. iPad is a hybrid of sorts, marrying select benefits of the smartphone and notebook. We expect the market to be small at first, but the gamer and education verticals should construct a meaningful growth ramp longer term." (Source AllThingsD)

    Yair Reiner, Oppenheimer

    "It finally gives the right form to leisurely functions long trapped, like the Frog Prince, in the body of a late-20th century office productivity tool." (What?) However, Reiner estimates iPad sales at only 1.1 million in fiscal 2010. (Source: CNN Money)

    Ben Reitzes, Barclays Capital:

    "In terms of features & services, we believe today's launch was largely in line with expectations. However, the pricing is much more attractive than expected and clearly shows Apple desires mass market appeal. Even accounting for potential cannibalization of other products, we believe iPad adds at least $1.00 in EPS power quickly & $20 plus in value to Apple's shares. He forecasts iPad sales of 2.9 million in FY 2010 and 7.3 million in FY '11. (Source: Barrons)

    Maynard Um, UBS:

    "The two big surprises to us were the price points at the low end ($499 for a 16GB model) and the attractive monthly wireless plans with AT&T ($15: 250 MB data transfer; $30: unlimited), with no associated contract. We believe the lower price points & data plans likely increases the mass market appeal for the iPad (vs. prior expectations)." (Source: Barrons)

    ]]>Discuss]]>
    http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/analysts_on_the_ipad_its_a_winner.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/analysts_on_the_ipad_its_a_winner.php Apple Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:53:46 -0800 Sarah Perez
    Apple Gets a Patent for Sharing Location Data During Calls apple_logo_jan09.pngApple just received a very interesting patent for a method of sharing location data during a phone call. Assuming that Apple implements this idea in its phones, you could soon press a button during a phone call on your iPhone and request location data
    from the person you are talking to. Judging from the description of this new feature in the patent, the receiver would always have to give permission before the data is sent back to you.

    ]]>Sponsor

    ]]> In the graphs that accompany Apple's patent, buttons to request and release location info can be found right underneath the standard iPhone phone interface. If Apple decides to implement this, the feature would work like this:

    During a call, you send out a request to get your friend's exact location by pressing a button on the phone interface. Your friend would get an alert and gets the choice to send his location data back to you or to ignore your request. Assuming your friend wants to share his location with you, you will then get an alert with your friend's location.

    Thanks to this, you wouldn't have to try to give long-winded and error-prone descriptions of where you are when you plan to meet up with a friend in the city, for example.

    Us 20100029302

    Reading through the patent, it quickly becomes clear that Apple is quite concerned with the privacy aspects of sharing location data. This makes sense, given that sharing location data has privacy implications that go far beyond just sharing what you had for lunch.

    It is worth noting that MobileMe users can already check where their phones are at any given point and that all the necessary hardware to implement this feature is already available in every iPhone.

    We also couldn't help be feel reminded of Echoecho, an iPhone app for sharing location data we profiled just about a week ago. Echoecho allows users to share location data on a one-on-one basis. Unlike Apple's patent, Echoecho's permission-based location sharing system isn't based solely around sharing this data in the context of a phone call, but otherwise, the two seems quite similar.

    ]]>Discuss]]>
    http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/apple_gets_a_patent_for_sharing_location_data_during_a_call.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/apple_gets_a_patent_for_sharing_location_data_during_a_call.php Apple Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:35:47 -0800 Frederic Lardinois