DoD - ReadWriteWeb http://www.readwriteweb.com/feeds/tag/DoD en Copyright 2009 Richard MacManus readwriteweb@gmail.com Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:12:49 -0800 http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.23-en http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss US Department of Defense Embraces Open Source dod_logo_oct09.jpgAt the US Department of Defense, open source and proprietary software are now on equal footing. According to Defense Department guidance issued yesterday (PDF), open-source software (OSS) should be treated just like any other software product. The document also specifies some of the advantages of OSS for the Department of Defense (DoD). These include the ability to quickly alter the code as situations and missions change, the stability of the software because of the broad peer-review, as well as the absence of per-seat licensing costs.

]]>Sponsor

]]> The document also stresses that OSS is "particularly suitable for rapid prototyping and experimentation, where the ability to 'test drive' the software with minimal costs and administrative delays can be important."

Clarifying OSS Misconceptions

The DoD already uses some open-source products. This new memorandum is meant to provide guidance on the use of OSS and to clarify some misconceptions. According to the DoD, these misconceptions have hampered "effective DoD use and development of OSS."

One of these misconceptions is that the DoD would have to distribute any changes made to the OSS code. In reality, most open-source licenses permit users to modify code for internal use and these organizations only have to make the changes public if they distribute the code outside of their organizations.

It's good to see the government embrace open-source software - though some members of the open-source movement will feel a bit queasy about the DoD using their software. Just last week, the White House website became a Drupal site and hopefully other branches of government will follow the DoD's lead and embrace open source as a valid means of acquiring and developing software.

DOD Open Source Rules

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/us_department_of_defense_embraces_open_source.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/us_department_of_defense_embraces_open_source.php News Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:16:03 -0800 Frederic Lardinois
DoD Protects U.S. but Who Protects the DoD? DoD_nov_08.jpgA rapidly spreading network worm, known as Agent BTZ, has prompted the U.S. army to put the use of USB drives and all removable data storage devices on hold temporarily, according to Wired's Noah Shachtman. Given the worm is based on SillyFDC, which has been around for several years and has a low risk factor, the question has to be asked: is this over-kill by the Defense Department?]]>Sponsor

]]> According to the report, Agent BTZ spreads by copying itself to USB drives and the like, so that when the drive is inserted into another computer, the worm replicates in a never ending cycle - every time a new drive is detected.

USB drives, as well as all removable storage devices, can run a program automatically on your machine based on the computer's configuration.

While Autorun is featured in Windows OS as a convenience, you do have the option of disabling it, particularly as an unfortunate side effect can be the loading and executing of programs on your PC without your knowledge.

Autorun and AutoPlay

There seems to be a little confusion about the differences between AutoPlay and Autorun so we've defined them here:

AutoPlay

AutoPlay is a Windows feature that lets you choose which program to use to start different kinds of media. You can change AutoPlay settings for each media type.

Autorun

Autorun is a technology used to start any program automatically when you insert various media into your computer. While different from AutoPlay, the result is typically the same: when inserted, a specific program on the external device runs automatically.

While you cannot modify the Autorun.inf file on the external device you plug into your machine, you can stop it from executing on your computer by modifying your registry.

To modify the registry setting, Microsoft has set up a page to help you determine which updates you will need, and then offers step by step instructions on how to disable Autorun. You can find it here.

Even though disabling of Autorun seems a relatively painless process, clearly it isn't enough to soothe the Defense Department or security experts.

Shachtman, in his Wired article asked Ryan Olson, director of rapid response for iDefense whether banning external devices was "a bit of over-kill," and received the answer "I don't know." Although, Olson did offer: "The USB ban should be effective in stopping the worm."

Perhaps the Defense Department should have taken its lead from what has been drummed into home computer users over the years; that is, use anti-virus software and keep your definitions up to date.

What do you think?

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/dod_protects_us_but_who_protec.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/dod_protects_us_but_who_protec.php News Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:39:28 -0800 Lidija Davis