There's no relation to memepool, the once-great mini-blog of handpicked Internet goodies. That one hasn't evolved since 2008. But armed with a little bit of Python and the surging population of Tumblr, Mendenhall will try to give the primordial ooze of the Web a new life of its own.

"Evolution creates amazing and complex things from just three simple rules: selection, replication, and variation," Mendenhall writes. We owe the amazing diversity of biological life to the application of these simple rules to enormous and complex gene pools over hundreds of millions of years.

Meme Pool has slightly more humble ambitions at the still-formidable scale of the human-driven Web. The genomes of Tumblr memes are much simpler than those of plants and animals. Meme Pool treats Tumblr posts' tags as alleles, each describing the phenotype, which is the image itself. The fitness of a Tumblr meme is determined by how many likes and reblogs it gets.

The Meme Pool

Meme Pool's population contains 20 posts at a time. Mendenhall says that gives posts a lifespan about a week "before they die of old age." Every day, the two fittest memes get to mate and create a child post. Meme Pool takes a random combination of the parents' tags and searches Flickr for interesting photos that match. When there's no good match for both combinations, Meme Pool uses a strategy sort of like nature's solution:

"Sometimes there's no match for both tags (e.g. 'Economics' and 'Lawn Darts'). In that case, the algorithm looks for images with either tag. This is a little bit like dominant and recessive traits: sometimes one tag will determine the entire phenotype. If there's no image for either tag, the post dies out immediately."

Without spontaneous generation, major evolutionary leaps might never happen. Meme Pool's random mutation comes from its Tumblr followers. Liking and reblogging posts from Meme Pool increases their fitness, making them more likely to survive and reproduce. Meme Pool also randomly reblogs one post from a follower per day, introducing its genes to the population. Anyone can also submit their own images to the Meme Pool to shake things up.

Health & Fitness

Meme Pool only launched yesterday (with a nice painting of the young Charles Darwin), and it's still fleshing out its population. It has had six generational updates so far as it approaches 20 memes, and biology still features heavily. It also contains some other historical figures and a few weird outliers, just like any healthy population.

There's a strong relationship in the phenotypes of some members of the first generation. The fly species Drosophilia is thriving in Meme Pool, which isn't surprising, since its often used as a model for scientists studying genetics. With Darwin himself as an ancestor, you can see the family resemblance.

Follow Meme Pool on Tumblr to participate in the experiment and shape memes on the Web for generations to come.

Photo 1 from Flickr user Gustavo (lu7frb) via Meme Pool Photo 2 reblogged from touba by Meme Pool

Kelly's book is a must read for technologists and anybody interested in the future of the Web. In this post I'll explore a few of the main themes of the book, in particular as they relate to the evolving Web. (there won't be any spoilers, for those of you in the middle of reading it or if you haven't yet read it!) Two of the main themes are how technology will evolve and how we - humanity - can guide it and make the best use of it.

The book literally starts from The Big Bang, proceeds through 4 billion years of our planet's evolution, and finally looks ahead to how technology will evolve.

The Technium: a Living System of Technology

Key to the book is a new term that Kelly invents: the technium. He spends about 6 pages explaining the term, but at it's most basic it means a system of technologies. It includes not only what we ordinarily think of as specific technologies (such as cars, radar, computers), but the entire system around technology - culture, art, social institutions, "the extended human" and more.

A key to grokking the technium is that it's a living system, which evolves in a similar way to humans. On page 45, Kelly explains that "the technium can really only be understood as a type of evolutionary life." He goes on to suggest that technology evolves in a mix of inevitable and chance ways, just as humans have done. His point being that we can fairly accurately predict the macro evolution of the technium (that computers will eventually acquire a level of intelligence akin to a human, for example), but not the micro details of that evolution.

We've been writing about the Internet of Things, when real world objects become connected to the Internet, for the past couple of years on ReadWriteWeb. Kelly's book reinforces what a profound change in the Web this is. As everyday objects get connected to the Internet, they almost become 'alive' to us. They might not be able to think for themselves, yet, but billions of 'things' in the world will be able to sense and compute information about the world.

Living With Technology's Increasing Power

On page 254, Kelly writes that "technologies are nearly living things." So we will need to adjust to this and figure out how best to utilize - and live with - technologies. Kelly lists five "proactions" that humanity should take to assess and engage with technologies:

1. Anticipation
2. Continual Assessment
3. Prioritization of Risks, Including Natural Ones
4. Rapid Correction of Harm
5. Not Prohibition but Redirection

At one point he compares technologies to children. As parents we aim to guide our children to reach their potential and contribute something to the world. "We can't really change the nature of our children," Kelly writes on page 257, "but we can steer them to tasks and duties that match their talents." Likewise, he suggests, we can guide and steer technology.

Was The Unibomber Right?

Kelly spends a significant part of the book exploring the moral and ethical issues around an ever more powerful technium. Is it wise for humanity to continue to let technologies evolve, until the technium is more intelligent than humanity?

A whole chapter is devoted to the theories of the infamous Unibomber, Ted Kaczynski. Kaczynski wrote a manifesto about destroying modern technology before it destroys us. He killed 3 people with mail bombs, while attempting to carry out his manifesto. Kelly at first defends Kaczynski's theories, but he ends the chapter by attacking him on a moral level. Kelly writes (page 212-213):

"But despite the reality of technology's faults, the Unibomber is wrong to want to exterminate it, for many reasons, not the least of which is that the machine of civilization offers us more actual freedoms than the alternative [...] so far the gains from this ever-enlarging technium outweigh the alternative of no machine at all."

The Optimistic View of Technology

Ultimately 'What technology Wants' is an uplifting and optimistic book about the future of technology. It contrasts in many ways to another thought-provoking technology book, which I read and reviewed a year ago: You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto; by Jaron Lanier. In that book, Lanier argued that technology reduces our humanity - for example by promoting the 'hive mind' over individual expression. Interestingly, Lanier is quoted on the jacket of Kelly's book. He recommends you read this book, "even though I profoundly disagree with aspects of it."

It's always beneficial to have skeptics about technology, so there's a place for Lanier's arguments. Both of Lanier's and Kelly's books are stimulating and well worth reading. However, I find myself much more swayed by Kelly's theories. Whereas Lanier dismisses the Internet as meaningless in and of itself, Kelly essentially argues that the technium (of which the Internet is a part) is a hugely important evolving system. It's as much a living system as humanity is. That, I suspect, is one of the aspects that Lanier would disagree with. But I find Kelly's theory to be compelling - and helpful as an approach to the increasing power of technology.

The book concludes that technology is ultimately good for humanity. Admittedly that was Kelly's pre-destined outcome - back in November, 2004, when he began writing the book, he blogged: "I sense that overall, technology is a good thing." However the end result of his 7 year quest, the book, compellingly makes that case. I think this line near the end of the book sums it up beautifully:

"How can technology make a person better? Only in this way: by providing each person with chances."

(which incidentally echoes my own thoughts after I read Lanier's book: "[...] Lanier glosses over the benefits of web 2.0 - that it gives everyone who has a computer (and nowadays a smart phone) a publishing platform with which to explore their creativity and have their say.")

I gave Kelly's book 5 out of 5 stars on Goodreads, because ultimately it provides useful advice on how to think about and deal with technology. Perhaps aspects of the book can be challenged on scientific or philosophical terms, as some have argued. But that seems beside the point. I think we'd all agree that technology is evolving incredibly fast. We need to try and understand the changes. We need strategies to get the best out of technology (and, by extension, ourselves). That's what Kevin Kelly wants; and in my view the book achieves it.

Photo credit: Doc Searls

Kelly's book is a must read for technologists and anybody interested in the future of the Web. In this post I'll explore a few of the main themes of the book, in particular as they relate to the evolving Web. (there won't be any spoilers, for those of you in the middle of reading it or if you haven't yet read it!) Two of the main themes are how technology will evolve and how we - humanity - can guide it and make the best use of it.

The Technium: a Living System of Technology

Key to the book is a new term that Kelly invents: the technium. He spends about 6 pages explaining the term, but at it's most basic it means a system of technologies. It includes not only what we ordinarily think of as specific technologies (such as cars, radar, computers), but the entire system around technology - culture, art, social institutions, "the extended human" and more.

A key to grokking the technium is that it's a living system, which evolves in a similar way to humans. On page 45, Kelly explains that "the technium can really only be understood as a type of evolutionary life." He goes on to suggest that technology evolves in a mix of inevitable and chance ways, just as humans have done. His point being that we can fairly accurately predict the macro evolution of the technium (that computers will eventually acquire a level of intelligence akin to a human, for example), but not the micro details of that evolution.

We've been writing about the Internet of Things, when real world objects become connected to the Internet, for the past couple of years on ReadWriteWeb. Kelly's book reinforces what a profound change in the Web this is. As everyday objects get connected to the Internet, they almost become 'alive' to us. They might not be able to think for themselves, yet, but billions of 'things' in the world will be able to sense and compute information about the world.

Living With Technology's Increasing Power

On page 254, Kelly writes that "technologies are nearly living things." So we will need to adjust to this and figure out how best to utilize - and live with - technologies. Kelly lists five "proactions" that humanity should take to assess and engage with technologies:

1. Anticipation
2. Continual Assessment
3. Prioritization of Risks, Including Natural Ones
4. Rapid Correction of Harm
5. Not Prohibition but Redirection

At one point he compares technologies to children. As parents we aim to guide our children to reach their potential and contribute something to the world. "We can't really change the nature of our children," Kelly writes on page 257, "but we can steer them to tasks and duties that match their talents." Likewise, he suggests, we can guide and steer technology.

Was The Unibomber Right?

Kelly spends a significant part of the book exploring the moral and ethical issues around an ever more powerful technium. Is it wise for humanity to continue to let technologies evolve, until the technium is more intelligent than humanity?

A whole chapter is devoted to the theories of the infamous Unibomber, Ted Kaczynski. Kaczynski wrote a manifesto about destroying modern technology before it destroys us. He killed 3 people with mail bombs, while attempting to carry out his manifesto. Kelly at first defends Kaczynski's theories, but he ends the chapter by attacking him on a moral level. Kelly writes (page 212-213):

"But despite the reality of technology's faults, the Unibomber is wrong to want to exterminate it, for many reasons, not the least of which is that the machine of civilization offers us more actual freedoms than the alternative [...] so far the gains from this ever-enlarging technium outweigh the alternative of no machine at all."

The Optimistic View of Technology

Ultimately 'What technology Wants' is an uplifting and optimistic book about the future of technology. It contrasts in many ways to another thought-provoking technology book, which I read and reviewed a year ago: You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto; by Jaron Lanier. In that book, Lanier argued that technology reduces our humanity - for example by promoting the 'hive mind' over individual expression. Interestingly, Lanier is quoted on the jacket of Kelly's book. He recommends you read this book, "even though I profoundly disagree with aspects of it."

It's always beneficial to have skeptics about technology, so there's a place for Lanier's arguments. Both of Lanier's and Kelly's books are stimulating and well worth reading. However, I find myself much more swayed by Kelly's theories. Whereas Lanier dismisses the Internet as meaningless in and of itself, Kelly essentially argues that the technium (of which the Internet is a part) is a hugely important evolving system. It's as much a living system as humanity is. That, I suspect, is one of the aspects that Lanier would disagree with. But I find Kelly's theory to be compelling - and helpful as an approach to the increasing power of technology.

The book concludes that technology is ultimately good for humanity. Admittedly that was Kelly's pre-destined outcome - back in November, 2004, when he began writing the book, he blogged: "I sense that overall, technology is a good thing." However the end result of his 7 year quest, the book, compellingly makes that case. I think this line near the end of the book sums it up beautifully:

"How can technology make a person better? Only in this way: by providing each person with chances."

(which incidentally echoes my own thoughts after I read Lanier's book: "[...] Lanier glosses over the benefits of web 2.0 - that it gives everyone who has a computer (and nowadays a smart phone) a publishing platform with which to explore their creativity and have their say.")

I gave Kelly's book 5 out of 5 stars on Goodreads, because ultimately it provides useful advice on how to think about and deal with technology. Perhaps aspects of the book can be challenged on scientific or philosophical terms, as some have argued. But that seems beside the point. I think we'd all agree that technology is evolving incredibly fast. We need to try and understand the changes. We need strategies to get the best out of technology (and, by extension, ourselves). That's what Kevin Kelly wants; and in my view the book achieves it.

Photo credit: Doc Searls

We're moving beyond the days of a simple search box in which you type a query and get a list of results. Today, companies are trying to build a smarter web - one that understands what things are, how they relate, and perhaps most importantly, what things you're going to like. But has Web 3.0 arrived in its full semantic glory? No, not yet. But it's clear we are getting closer than ever before.

To begin, there's the seemingly minor announcement from Xmarks, the company formerly known as Foxmarks, but now rebranded thanks to their multi-browser support. Xmarks has introduced additional features to their bookmark synchronization product which include things like site suggestions and smarter search. By leveraging their large stash of data (600 million bookmarks), Xmarks is now able to recommend sites right within your search results. This is done by placing an Xmarks icon next to those results which are most popular, meaning most bookmarked, on their service. Also, when you visit a web site and click the Xmarks icon in your address bar, Xmarks will return a list of sites similar to the one you're currently browsing.

The data used to deliver these recommendations and suggestions are anonymized - a good thing considering that our browser bookmarks are often the ones we have specifically chosen not to share with others. For bookmarks to become recommended in this fashion, they must be fairly popular on the service - a level that's determined by the number of times saved as a percentage within a particular category.

In a way, what Xmarks is doing is very similar to what StumbleUpon's browser extension does too. Like Stumble, Xmarks annotates our search results highlighting those that may be of value to us. Yet Xmarks takes it a step further by discovering related sites, too.

The Smarter Tracking Tool (Evri)

Another company revealing new innovations here at DEMO 09 is Evri, a semantic search engine which understands what's called "natural language." Evri knows the different parts of a sentence (subject, verb, object) and it knows how those parts are connected to each other.

Although still too raw to be your main search engine, Evri has a new "Collections" feature which lets you follow topics (aka search queries) that are of interest to you. After returning a list of search results which include Wikipedia entries, news articles, videos, and images, you can click the star labeled "Follow this" to continue to track that topic. What's missing from this feature, though, is an alerting system which will inform you of updates via email or RSS. However, the company says that's coming later on.

Evri is also branching out from being a web destination alone by introducing Evri widgets which can now be seen in action on the Washington Post's web site. These widgets parse the content on the page to deliver smart recommendations of similar articles both on the site itself as well as elsewhere on the web. 

Another new feature launching now is Evri's browser toolbar. By clicking on a button next to the Evri search box in the toolbar, the people, places, and things on a web page are highlighted. Click on these items and pop-ups appear with more information about the keyword, what's related to the topic plus news, images, and videos.

This additional layer of information on top of standard text makes browsing the web and reading articles a deeper and richer experience. No longer do you need to perform web searches in a separate window to understand definitions, context, and meaning. Instead, Evri's toolbar adds an intelligence to the web that was never there before. It's clear that the company is still working towards making that additional layer more accurate and more relevant, though, but conceptually the idea is solid.

The RSS Reader That Learns (Ensembli)

Ensembli, an RSS reader of sorts, takes a different approach to tracking topics than Evri does with its "Collections" feature. Where Evri's UI can sometimes feel a bit cluttered with its multimedia results, Ensembli's interface is simple - you just type in a topic and it will continue searching for new articles related to what you entered. But this reader doesn't simply pull information for you - it learns what you like. Every time you read, ignore, or discard a story, Ensembli gets to know your tastes a  little bit better.

While this feed reader is far too simplified for RSS junkies like us, it's easy to see how Ensembli could be a good introductory tool for RSS beginners. Still, the sources it returns sometimes seem lacking and it's hard to say if this will ever be any more useful that a simple Google Alert, for example. Nevertheless, it's not really the feed reading itself which makes Ensembli intriguing, it's the learning element. Whatever algorithm is at work behind the scenes figuring out your likes and dislikes is what's the most important aspect of this new technology.

Getting Smarter...Little by Little

Taken by themselves, the above announcements may have seemed more evolutionary than revolutionary, but look at them within a broader scope and you can see a pattern beginning to develop. In this transitional period from Web 2.0 to Web 3.0, we're starting to see tools and services that aim to expand upon the traditional search experience in order to deliver us to a more intelligent web. On this new web, we're moving beyond SEO and PageRank to determine relevance and instead are seeing new technologies develop that better understand meaning, context, and personal preferences.

Stayed tuned...part 2 of "The Smarter Web" will continue tomorrow.