filesharing - ReadWriteWeb http://www.readwriteweb.com/feeds/tag/filesharing en Copyright 2009 Richard MacManus readwriteweb@gmail.com Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:30:25 -0800 http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.23-en http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss You're the Backup: Pirate Bay Archive Available for Download piratebay_archive_aug09.jpgThe Pirate Bay is like a gigantic inch worm. If you cut it down, it's various pieces rise up and keep growing. As The Pirate Bay prepares to be passed on to Global Gaming X AB, the service is offering the ultimate legacy gift to users. It looks as if an anonymous user uploaded the entire site's archive in order to ensure that multiple backups exist in case torrents are removed post-purchase. Users who would like to download an archival copy of the site, can access it as a massive 21.3 gigabyte download for free.

]]>Sponsor

]]> According to TorrentFreak, "The backup includes a mock up site and all of the 873,671 torrent files hosted on The Pirate Bay's servers." Users who plan on downloading it are warned to be patient as a file of this size will take a few days to download from a limited group of torrents. Nevertheless, given that the file represents 2 million Pirate Bay torrents, it's actually fairly compact.

Before jumping to it, it may be smart to remind yourself of the legal issues currently facing both the Pirate Bay founders and perhaps more importantly, the non-commercial cases of Joel Tenenbaum and Jammie Thomas-Rasset.

piratebay_archive_aug09a.jpg

Most recently, the Department of Justice upheld the award of 1.92 million dollars to the RIAA from single mom Jammie Thomas-Rasset. Minnesota woman Thomas-Rasset is expected to pay $80,000 per song for 24 KaZaA files she'd downloaded in 2004. The RIAA has gone after more than 20,000 people for music piracy, but has more recently chosen to focus on internet service providers rather than on non-commercial infringers. Depending on your country of residence, getting caught using the Pirate Bay archive file could be devastating.

If you're still curious, or you simply want to read the comments, the download page is available here.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/youre_the_backup_pirate_bay_archive_available_for.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/youre_the_backup_pirate_bay_archive_available_for.php P2P Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:45:16 -0800 Dana Oshiro
Pirate Bay Acquired for $7.8 million, Content Providers to Get Paid piratebay_ggf_jun09a.jpgAccording to their blog and a recent BusinessWire release, controversial Swedish bit torrent tracker the Pirate Bay, is being acquired by Global Gaming Factory X AB for roughly $7.8 million in cash and shares (or $60 million SEK).

On the blog, the group hopes to alleviate concerns by saying:
"If the new owners screw around with the site, nobody will keep using it. That's the biggest insurance one can have that the site will be run in the way that we all want it to. And - you can now not only share files, but shares, with people. Everybody can indeed be the owner of The Pirate Bay now. That's awesome and will take the heat off us."

]]>Sponsor

]]> And the heat has certainly been on The Pirate Bay. For the last year, the group has been in and out of court battles and has continued to take a strong stance against legal threats regarding copyright violations.

Judging by blog comments, it's obvious that users are extremely concerned. Global Gaming Factory will be taking over operation of the site in August 2009. As part of this acquisition, GGF can now incorporate the KTH Royal Institute of Technology and SICS, Swedish Institute of Computer Science's new data distribution technology - Peerialism. Presumably the service will increase torrent speeds.
piratebay_ggf_jun09.jpg
Additionally, says GGF CEO, Hans Pandeya, "We would like to introduce models which entail that content providers and copyright owners get paid for content that is downloaded via the site."

It will be interesting to see if fans will stick with the service and how the company's revenue program will differ from predecessors like Grooveshark's compensation service for file uploaders.

Thanks to Steven for the tip!

UPDATE: According to TorrentFreak, The Pirate Bay will be using a 3rd party tracker and host for torrents. We'll just have to wait and see if this has to do with GGF's move with Peerialism.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pirate_bay_acquired_for_78_million_content_provide.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pirate_bay_acquired_for_78_million_content_provide.php P2P Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:14:34 -0800 Dana Oshiro
Qtask: Web-Based Team Collaboration The new surge in Enterprise 2.0 technologies is giving companies, especially small-to-medium sized businesses, more alternatives when it comes to company intranet portals for team collaboration and project management. In fact, it has taken those portals, once only available behind the firewall, and put them online as a software-as-a-service (SaaS) offerings. One such SaaS portal for information sharing among company employees launches today at DEMO08: Qtask, a project-centric collaboration environment.

]]>Sponsor

]]> Qtask offers a variety of services that make it competitive with other enterprise-friendly team collaboration portals, like Microsoft's SharePoint, for example (assuming you don't need the more advanced features of SharePoint like workflows, granular security control, or integration with other in-house Microsoft technologies).

Qtask Overview

Like SharePoint, Qtask offers a number of features for team collaboration including discussion boards, wikis, file sharing, form creation tools, RSS, calendaring, and full contextual search. With its comprehensive tool set, projects can be created, managed, maintained, and tracked. Because all the information relating to various tasks is online, new team members can get up-to-date quickly on the status of various projects just by signing into Qtask.

Getting Started

When you first sign into Qtask, you're presented with a global dashboard from which you can see an overview of all the most important items, including tasks and their status, meetings you've been invited to and those you're scheduled to attend, recently updated wikis and files, your schedule, team members and other important top-level items. The layout of these items is similar to that of iGoogle and its widgets, which makes it easy to see at a glance everything that you need to focus on.

Global Dashboard

At the top of this dashboard is navigation that can take you deeper into the site - to discussion boards, team calendars, project homepages, and more. Like the global dashboard, each project's homepage focuses on just the key items (meetings, tasks, files, etc.) for that specific project.

It's All In The Details

Although there are many portals for team collaboration like this available today, it's the little details in Qtask that make it worth a look. For example, in the discussion threads, discussions can be set to public or private, unread items appear in a different color, and you can flag items as "hot" to draw attention to them. Team calendars feature thumbnails of the members faces and discussion areas where members can work out details, discuss agendas, etc.

Editing the Meeting Deatails

Other great features include version control for uploaded files and syndication (via RSS) of file shares and wikis - and both of which can even be shared with those outside the company. A site-wide search box lets you perform searches and also offers a number of advanced options to help you find just what you need:

Other Features

Built-in tools for form creation are also included with Qtask as is a mail feature which can be used for internal communications. Outside email like that from Gmail or Yahoo can be integrated with Qtask via IMAP support.

However, one of the most useful features in Qtask is its ability to track changes. File history can be tracked as to who uploaded, downloaded, or accessed a file and when. Tasks, meetings, wikis, and discussions can be tracked as well. This feature has made Qtask so popular with lawyers, that the company will soon be releasing a customized version just for them. (Out of Qtask's initial crop of 2000 users, many are lawyers).

Keeping Track of Changes

Finally, Qtask is available via a mobile browser - a must have for today's on-the-go workforce and remote workers. Whether you use a Blackberry, iPhone, or a standard mobile of some sort, you have access to everything on the site.

On The Horizon

In addition to the upcoming version of Qtask customized for lawyers offices, the company also hopes to create more customized versions for several different types of companies, including perhaps doctors or real estate offices, as those are other popular users of their program.

They also plan to release an enterprise version later on which can be implemented on a company's own servers as an alternative to the SaaS solution they have today.

Affordable And Feature-Rich

Qtask offers plenty of features which will appeal to the SMB market looking for a project-focused web-based tool for team collaboration. The service is very affordable, too: free for 5 users for the first year and comes with 5 hours of free training. Additional users are $50/each per month. Prices include the ability to create unlimited projects, access to online training and online technical support.

At launch time, Qtask is offering a special: charter accounts will only be charged $25/year for additional users.

You can learn more about Qtask from visiting their web site, available at www.qtask.com.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/qtask_web-based_team_collabora.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/qtask_web-based_team_collabora.php Products Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:00:00 -0800 Sarah Perez
Blackberry is Not Microsoft (Sorry Apple) I did it! I resisted the cravings all week. I did NOT buy an iPhone. It took a lot of deep Buddhist meditation to deal with my cravings. The iPhone is just gorgeous - this is user interface design at the highest level of art. Plus, the developer platform makes developers who dream in design patterns go all weak at the knees. The last time a UI and API induced equal cravings was in NeXt. No that is not a snide comment, Jobs learned from NeXt and this one is a big, big winner. But, oh yes there is a but, iPhone is still a piece of utility electronics.

]]>Sponsor

]]> When the sizzle ends, the steak still has to taste good. The iPhone has to be better than what people are currently using based on simple metrics of productivity. If the competition is Mac OSX vs Windows, it is no contest at all. Not only is OSX great eye candy, it also wins on productivity and the competition suffers from really annoying stuff like crashes, brownouts and other time-sinks.

But the competition here is not Microsoft. For the business user, the competition is Blackberry; and Blackberry is not Microsoft. I am a long time Blackberry user and it is seldom annoying. It just gets the job done. So unlike when I switched back from Windows to Mac, which I did with a big sigh of relief, I am in no hurry to switch based on anything wrong with what I have.

And a few reviews are making me think that iPhone could be a high maintenance date. Sure, high maintenance dates can be fun, but I am judging this on boring utility criteria. For example:

1. Keyboard. I am ready to be convinced by touch-screen keyboards. But I am not sure I want to spend the time adjusting. Outside the USA, where SMS is the major use of a mobile phone, I think this is a big deal. Flipping to horizontal is neat, but does this work for email?

2. Battery. Any mobile device that cannot do a full day's work and play without re-charge is a pain. You don't want to be in "don't leave home without it" mode regarding your charger unless you are going for more than a day. On a normal day, it's plug it in before you go to sleep and pick it up in the morning.

3. It's a bit big as a phone. OK, so is the Blackberry. But, as they say, size matters when you are holding it to your ear. Some people express almost comical amusement at the idea of using the iPhone as a phone - "you still call people, how quaint". Then don't call it a Phone, because it does set that expectation.

I know that resistance is futile. I will get an iPhone eventually. Or Blackberry will give me a better browser, which is really what I love about iPhone.

The killer app for me? Skype to Skype calls over WiFi. I believe that requires an unlocked iPhone. It would dramatically change the economics of mobile phones. Which AT&T certainly knows and will be resisting for as long as possible.

Plus a really slim but full function collapsible keyboard, so I can write full length stuff as easily as on my laptop. And then a simple way to plug into any screen that's around, so I can edit docs stored in the cloud. So that I can stop lugging around my laptop; that's a big win for people who spend a lot of time away from their desk.

My guess is that the iPhone ecosystem will bring all these things to market fairly soon. The iPhone is the first real new platform since Windows (sorry, Facebook).

Image: After the iPhone Keynote, Jan 2007; pic by mac steve

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blackberry_is_not_microsoft_sorry_apple.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blackberry_is_not_microsoft_sorry_apple.php Analysis Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:05:55 -0800 Bernard Lunn
The Other Startup Exit: SitePoint Marketplace About a year ago, the so-called "eBay exit," in which startups sold themselves on eBay, got a lot of buzz after an article in USA Today. We picked up the story as well and noted a number of relatively high profile eBay start up exits, the most famous of which is probably the 2006 eBay sale of online calendar startup Kiko for $250,100. But the preferred quick public sale location for startups may no longer be eBay. That title may now belong to the SitePoint Marketplace.

]]>Sponsor

]]> We mentioned SitePoint in our post about eBay startup sales, and noted that blog platform Blogster attempted to sell itself on SitePoint in January 2007, though apparently unsuccessfully.

Since then, SitePoint has experienced tremendous growth in their Marketplace, and expects to see $60 million worth of web sites for sale this year. How many of those will actually sell is another matter altogether, but sales were up 290% last month to $1.2 million in declared sales out of about $5 million listed (i.e., the total asking price of all sites listed in April). The site's Premium Sites section (reserve of $10,000+) has seen an approximately 20% sell through rate since January.

The Marketplace, which also includes sections for selling domains, templates, scripts and software, and other services, now accounts for 35% of SitePoint's traffic, eclipsing their very large forums in popularity. SitePoint's forums have 250,000 members and 3-4k simultaneous users at all times, so that's saying something. SitePoint actually just recently launched a new forum for the discussion of selling web sites.

How many of the sites being sold on SitePoint are web apps or web 2.0 mashups is hard to tell -- my guess is not all that many. Most of the sites up for sale on the SitePoint Marketplace are niche content plays, ecommerce sites, or web discussion forums. But the occasional web 2.0 startup does cross their pages. SitePoint will never be the place to sell very large ticket sites (it's doubtful that you'll see Google trawling the SitePoint Marketplace looking for an acquisition -- though that's where TechCrunch picked up InviteShare last summer), but it is a good exit option for smaller, "me-too" startups, mashups, or niche social networks.

Full disclosure: For four years I was a volunteer moderator at SitePoint's Forums, and also moderated sales in the Marketplace section, where I helped to create many of the original buyer/seller guidelines. I am no longer involved with the site.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_other_startup_exit_sitepoint_marketplace.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_other_startup_exit_sitepoint_marketplace.php Trends Wed, 07 May 2008 11:30:20 -0800 Josh Catone
Similarr: Talk About Search Results Similarr is a new search mashup that turns search results into highly targeted discussion forums. The site mashes search results from Live.com with a customized version of the open source phpBB forum to create a search engine the encourages discussion about its results. There is certainly room for improvement, but as a concept, Similarr might actually make some sense.

]]>Sponsor

]]> Similarr displays search results taken via the Live Search API and creates a forum for each search. The forum is displayed alongside results. For example, a search for "NASA" would automatically create a "NASA" forum. If anyone had previously searched for the same topic and a left a message, the forum would display with those previous discussions already there.

For a power user, whose searches generally take a form like "term" + "quote" -term site:something.com it may seem silly to try to create a forum for every search term -- surely there won't be enough overlap to create stimulating conversations. For many terms, there probably won't be, but recall that when Jason Calacanis launched Mahalo last year, he said that the top 10,000 search terms account for about a quarter of all searches. With that in mind, Similarr makes more sense.

Similarr also has intent on its side. Google taught us that text ads on search results work because the searcher is showing intent by seeking out information on a specific subject. That concept could work in Similarr's favor -- people may be more apt to join a discussion about a topic they are specifically searching for information about. But in the immediate future, the site faces a chicken and egg problem. While people may be happy to join a discussion already in progress, not many people are likely to want to initiate discussions on an empty forum. Like Mahalo, Similarr may need to pay contributors to seed discussions on forums for top searches.

One thing the site should do, is figure out a way to combine -- or cross post -- to forums for similar topics. For example, a forum for "Tiger Woods" should probably show posts for the search "Tiger Woods injury" or "Tiger Woods knee surgery" as well. There is a lot of overlap in the list of the top 10,000 searches, slight discrepancies in search terms but people are generally looking for the same thing. Similarr needs to figure out how to combine alike searches into a single forum, which will not only be useful to users of the site, but will also automatically seed content in forums for less common search terms that fall under the umbrella of a more common term.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/similarr_talk_about_search_results.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/similarr_talk_about_search_results.php Mashups Wed, 07 May 2008 10:15:43 -0800 Josh Catone
Radiohead Looks to Fans for Music Video Production Leave it to Radiohead, the pioneering alt-rock band that released its latest album last fall under a pay-what-you-want price scheme to a lot of fan fare (and some criticism of gimmickry), to push the envelope further. The band is now asking fans to create their first music video for the album in a contest utilizing online YouTube of animation (and Crunchies finalist) Aniboom.

]]>Sponsor

]]> Radiohead is hardly the first act to call on fans to create a music video. In the past couple of years the Decemberists, Modest Mouse, Junior Boys, Willie Nelson, Bjork, Jonathon Coulton, and The Hold Steady, among others, have all held video contests. The Beastie Boys went a step further and relied solely on fan footage for an entire concert DVD. Even Madonna, known for lavishly expensive music videos, held a "Make My Video" contest with MTV for "True Blue" in 1986.

The Radiohead In Rainbows contest is being run a bit differently in that they've partnered with an independent video site, are focusing on animation, and are using a tiered voting approach that allows fans to be involved with picking the winner. Further, any song on the album is eligible for being turned into a video, which means fans will in many ways get to define the band's first single.

Until April 27th, anyone can submit a storyboard or clip to Aniboom detailing their idea for a Radiohead video. Users will vote on the 10 best, who will then each be given $1,000 to create a one minute version of their concept. The band will choose the winner, who will receive a $10,000 budget to make the full video for the band in June.

Check out the storyboard example below:

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/radiohead_music_video_contest.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/radiohead_music_video_contest.php Trends Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:31:54 -0800 Josh Catone
Goodbye, P2P! P4P is Coming P2P, or peer-to-peer, is the protocol currently used by many file sharing networks for moving large files over the internet. Now, a new protocol, P4P - aka Proactive network Provider Participation for P2P - is being introduced by Verizon. P4P's goal is to reduce backbone traffic and lower network operation costs. Will P4P bring us the bandwidth we've been waiting for?

]]>Sponsor

]]> Unlike P2P, which selects random peers to share with, when using P4P the peers are intelligently selected as the protocol utilizes network topology data to maximize the efficiency of routing between the peer-to-peer connections.

Verizon just tested P4P with Pando and received performance boosts of 200 percent on average and increases of up to 600 percent in some cases.

What's most remarkable about this story is that Verizon is looking towards working with P2P traffic instead of throttling it like Comcast has been doing lately.

At an upcoming conference in New York, Verizon will present their test results, which show that when an ISP cooperates with file-sharing, they can speed downloads an average of 60 percent.

"This test signifies a turning point in the history of peer-to-peer technology and ISPs," said Robert Levitan, chief executive of Pando Networks Inc. "It will definitely show ISPs that the problem is not peer-to-peer technology, the problem is how you deploy it. It is possible to deploy P2P to their advantage. The Internet is quickly transforming into a media distribution platform, and there are people who say: 'It will break. It's not built to move music and movies and games and software.' New technologies are needed, and this is one of those technologies."

The P4P protocol may even be ready by next month, when NBC begins offering HD downloads of popular TV shows via the Pando software.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/goodbye_p2p_p4p_is_coming.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/goodbye_p2p_p4p_is_coming.php Products Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:12:02 -0800 Sarah Perez
Twittershare Brings File Sharing to Twitter I love Twitter but even when it's not down it's got its limitations. Enter the API and a world of developers eager to engage with the active community of Twitter users. Twittershare is the newest truly useful development on top of Twitter; it lets you easily share files of up to 10mb in size.

Mac users can upload and post with a desktop widget, everyone can use the web interface and a cross-platform AIR app is forthcoming.

]]>Sponsor

]]> Twittershare was built by a web design shop called Phoreo, sassy church-going web developers in Indiana. When you're perusing the list of the most popular Twitter clients, you won't find others that support file transfers this large. I'll put this one in my shortlist of handy apps to remember.

There's some kinks to work out still, but none are show stoppers. The possibilities for further feature development are many but I expect Twittershare to stay simple. Just like Twitter itself - simple is often all you need.

]]>Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/twittershare.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/twittershare.php Products Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:37:38 -0800 Marshall Kirkpatrick