readability - ReadWriteWeb http://www.readwriteweb.com/feeds/tag/readability en Copyright 2012 Richard MacManus readwriteweb@gmail.com Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:00:00 -0800 http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.35-en http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Fallout and Frustrations From Apple's New Subscription Plan Continue Since announcing its new subscription plan last week, Apple's move to collect a 30% cut of revenue has had raised the ire of a number of developers and commentators. Mike Melanson offered a round-up on some of the initial reactions, that ranged from "greedy" to "anti-competitive" to "Brilliant, Brazen or Batsh*t Crazy.

Apple's 30% fee is posing problems for a number of companies and developers - those who've built their businesses around the existing rules, for example, and those who don't have the margins to be able to hand over such a cut to Apple. Companies that have raised questions about the new policy run the gamut - music streaming services, e-book sellers, and software-as-a-service developers; big companies and startups alike.

]]> No Margin for That 30% Cut

The expletives that came from Last.fm co-founder Richard Jones last week may be one of the most colorful responses to Apple's announcement, but his analysis speaks to the core of many developers' concerns. Jones said in an IRC chatroom that "apple just f***ed over online music subs for the iphone." Jones hinted that Apple may have plans to launch its own streaming service and is therefore attempting to squeeze out the competition. But whether that's the case or not, he contends that "many services can't survive a 30 percent loss of revenue." Jones specifically mentions Spotify, reportedly poised to make its entry in U.S. markets, arguing that he can't imagine its "margins are anywhere near 30 percent."

Trouble for Alternative Funding Models

Readability just announced this morning that its iOS app had been rejected by Apple as the startup wasn't running its service through the new subscription plan guidelines.

Readability offers a service whereby it redesigns Web pages - stripping out ads and resizing text, for example - in order to make online content more legible. Users pay a monthly subscription fee to use Readability, which in turn offers a unique funding model for publishers - the company gives them a 70% cut of the revenue from folks' reading lists. "If we implemented In App purchasing," writes Readability in an Open Letter to Apple, "your 30% cut drastically undermines a key premise of how Readability works."

No Room in the Store for Big Catalogs

Jim Dovey, formerly the Apple Platforms Team Lead for the e-bookseller Kobo had raised another key stumbling block. As it currently stands, there's a cap on the number of items you can sell via in-app purchases. According to Dovey, Apple's "in-app purchasing system only allows 3000 or 3500 distinct items to be in your catalog (depending who you talk to). Kobo and Amazon each have around 2.5 million titles. Judging by the title of Kobo's app, 1.8 million are public domain (or otherwise free), so some 700,000 are paid titles, which they are under obligation to the content owners to make available for sale to all their users."

The dissatisfaction isn't only coming from developers or companies who've invested in the Apple third-party ecosystem. PaidContent.org reports that anti-trust regulators are looking into Apple's subscription plan. But in the meantime, angry developers are looking at their own alternatives.

As Readability notes in its blog post today, "To be clear, we believe you have every right to push forward such a policy. In our view, it's your hardware and your channel and you can put forth any policy you like. But to impose this course on any web service or web application that delivers any value outside of iOS will only discourage smaller ventures like ours to invest in iOS apps for our services. As far as Readability is concerned, our response is fairly straight-forward: go the other way... towards the web."

It seems likely that others will follow suit - putting their development efforts into the mobile web or into alternate operating systems (namely Android).

]]> Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fallout_and_frustrations_from_apples_new_subscript.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fallout_and_frustrations_from_apples_new_subscript.php Apple Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:01:16 -0800 Audrey Watters
Removing the Clutter: Readability Bookmarklet Makes Online Reading Easier readability_logo_feb09.pngWhile reading is one of the main activities on the Internet, a lot of sites pay very little attention to the readability of their text. Instead, the reader's eye is constantly drawn to other UI elements, ads, and widgets. Arc90's Readability experiment is setting out to change this. Readability is a small bookmarklet that extracts the text from almost any web site and displays it on an easy to read page that removes all of the clutter that can make reading on the Internet so hard sometimes.

]]> Installing Readability is easy - all you have to do is select your favorite settings for style (newspaper, novel, eBook, or Terminal), size (small to extra large) and margin (narrow to extra wide). After that, you simply drag and drop a link to your bookmarks. To activate Readability on any page, you simply click the bookmark.

nyt_normal_readability_comparison.jpg

Readability doesn't work on every site, but we tested it on most popular news sites and blogs, and it worked almost everywhere. Most of the time, Readability will also display comments when you are reading a blog post. While it displays most images, however, the bookmarklet sadly deletes every embedded video.

What About Those Ads?

Removing the clutter, of course, also means removing the advertising that a lot of sites need to run to make a living. For sites that rely on click-through ads, Readability is just about as bad as AdBlock Plus (or the more anarchic Add-Art), but sites that get paid per ad impression probably won't care too much about this, as the regular page still has to be loaded before you can activate the Readability bookmarklet.

Instapaper, which Arc90 credits as an inspiration, of course, also has a text-only reading mode for saved pages, but its focus is less on making the text readable and more on saving a copy of the page. Unlike Readability, Instapaper also doesn't display any of the images embedded in a text.

]]> Discuss]]>
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/removing_the_clutter_readability_makes_online_readability_plugin.php http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/removing_the_clutter_readability_makes_online_readability_plugin.php Product Reviews Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:39:06 -0800 Frederic Lardinois