ReadWriteWeb

troys

4 result(s) displayed (1 - 4 of 4):

Troys: One Twitter Script to Rule Them All

By Phil Glockner / April 24, 2009 3:40 PM / View Comments

Over the past year, all the major tech blogs have done round-up articles of great Greasemonkey scripts to use with Twitter (including us). What this says about Twitter's native functionality we aren't sure, but we know we've had upwards of 10 separate scripts installed and active at different times.

All that is going to end, at least for the next little while, as we have just found the GM script that does everything (and we mean everything). It's the innocently named, Troy's Twitter Script (created by Troy Thompson) that we first noticed written up over on TechRaga.

Netscape wears Digg's clothing - but underneath it's still a portal

By Richard MacManus / June 14, 2006 10:47 PM

Techcrunch has the scoop on the new Netscape portal beta, which bears a striking resemblance to Digg. Mike thinks it's a "digg killer" and in terms of pure numbers it may well be. Netscape gets a surprising 811 million monthly page views, which digg is at around 200 M per month. But despite the Digg-ish features, the new Netscape portal is still trying to keep users onsite and also gives them less control over what content ranks highly.

netscape digg
The Tech frontpage. Note the top link - about the "hazards" of online collectivism.

Some points to consider:

1) The headline link is to the comments page on the Netscape site, while the actual originator of the content gets the secondary links (the 'via' link and the 'Visit the site' link, which opens up in a new window). The editors also sometimes provide commentary on the articles ("Netscape Anchor Commentary"), which tends to deflect attention away from the article itself. These are subtle things, but it's obvious the objective is to keep Netscape users inside the Netscape site. This of course exposes users to the multitude of ads on Netscape, rather than send them away to the actual sources of the content. Seems a bit portal-ish to me.

2) While users votes count in determining what gets displayed, Netscape editors (aka "anchors") choose what gets to the top of the front pages. Will they favor mainstream publications? Will they not promote anti-AOL stories? Will they... etc etc. You can see how this might open up any number of claims of bias.

3) Generally speaking I'm not convinced about the relative merits of editors/anchors over the more democratic (but admittedly problematic at times) 'wisdom of the crowd'. I noticed this comment from Jason Calacanis on the 'Hazards' story:

"[...] what we're doing with Netscape is exactly what he's looking for: an editorial voice to balance the hive mind. Our Anchors are the balance to the limitations of the crowd--and vica versa!"
(emphasis mine)

While I've been as vocal as anyone about the mob mentality occasionally shown at digg - I wonder whether the opposite approach of using editors to determine ranking and lead discussions is really the answer for so-called community sites. It's inherently less democratic, even if it ends up being more effective. I guess time will tell, but at the very least it's an interesting experiment. I can't see any current Digg users defecting, but perhaps Digg should hurry up with those new features it's been promising!

The Sad Decline of PubSub

By Richard MacManus / June 14, 2006 3:55 PM

pubsubIt's a shame to hear from Bob Wyman that PubSub is in trouble and in big danger of shutting its doors. Bob says that "internal political issues" are behind PubSub's demise and implies that this has deflected resources from actually improving the product. It's not my place to comment on the politics, but I do think PubSub has dropped the ball on the product front.

PubSub once held so much promise... It was the first real 'future search' product to gain traction and it was an innovator in the area of custom RSS feeds. The somewhat clumsy term I've used for that is Topic/Tag/Remix Feeds and here's what I said about it back in January 2005:

"Tools will evolve to let people easily set-up personalized searches for information relevant to them and subscribe to the results - using, you guessed it, RSS! Google will probably be the front-runner (see this video for a hint to the future - thanks twdanny for the reminder), PubSub will be another, current players like Bloglines and Technorati will be in amongst it, and who knows who else."

pubsubAs well, I thought PubSub was one of the leading companies in filtering feeds - the next layer up from aggregation. But unfortunately for all their promise, PubSub never quite lived up to it and services like Google News and Technorati have taken the limelight instead. Technorati has had its technical issues (which remain to this day), but one thing they've always done very well is the UI. Which is where I feel PubSub has let itself down, because their UI has always been a bit awkward and geeky. Technorati has also proven itself to be outstanding at PR and drumming up publicity about itself. PubSub never really got that knack, despite Bob and others best efforts to talk up its technology. If anything PubSub has been too tech-centric, whereas Technorati reaches out to 'the people' (with its tags PR blitz and the 'A-List Person's Favorite Blogs' feature, for example). 

However it's precisely because PubSub has always been very forward-thinking about web technology that made me like it and thus makes me sad about its demise. PubSub was into topic mapping circa 2004, when few other mainstream RSS companies were. PubSub was also one of the instigators of the Structured Blogging open source project. Indeed I worked with them - via Broadband Mechanics - on the recent website re-design (SB is a separate entity now, so isn't in danger of sinking with PubSub).

Their technology nous has always impressed me and at the end of 2004 they came very close to being named my Most Promising Web 2.0 Company of 2004. I gave that honor to Feedburner in the end, but here's what I said about PubSub (Dec 30, 2004):

"...PubSub has been building a technically very sound service mostly quietly in the background (but that's about to change in '05, by the looks of it)..."

That 'by the looks of it' pointed indirectly to PubSub's 2005 resolutions, which currently is a File Not Found page. That about sums up the situation, I'm afraid. Whereas Feedburner and other promising startups I mentioned at the end of 2004 (e.g. Bloglines, SixApart) have gone on to greater things, PubSub lost its way and the end looks imminent. I really hope they can somehow turn things around and get rid of the 'political' monkey on its back, because I know they have the smarts and the people to achieve success.

eBay Wiki - world's largest commercial wiki launched

By Richard MacManus / June 13, 2006 6:28 PM

ebay wikieBay, in collaboration with JotSpot, has just released a new community wiki - making it almost certainly the world's largest wiki platform for a commercial website (Wikipedia is bigger, but it's non-commercial). eBay Wiki is described as "a collection of fact-based articles written and maintained by eBay Community members" and is powered by JotSpot's innovative wiki technology. I spoke to JotSpot co-founder and CEO Joe Kraus about the new eBay wiki yesterday - his thoughts later in this post. But first an overview of the product. 

ebay wiki

eBay Wiki is located at www.ebaywiki.com and the wiki topics are categorized and tagged. You must be logged in as an eBay member to edit a wiki page, which then presents you with an easy-to-use wysiwyg HTML editor. So no awful wiki syntax to learn!

ebay wiki edit

Choosing topics/sub-topics and tags is very easy, as the following screenshot shows:

ebay wiki topics tags

eBay Wiki also has article history and ratings, the editor's user details and seller/buyer ratings (i.e. their eBay reputation), RSS feeds and other easy-to-use social features.

So why did eBay choose to add a wiki? eBay has a buyer and seller community of more than 193 million members - a huge community that is thriving with conversations and activity. Their message boards get over 100,000 messages per week and eBay users are very knowledgeable on their topic niches. Having a Wiki on eBay will serve to refine and formalize the cream of the content in its user forums. It will also help eBay in the search engine rankings, as its user-generated content coffers will increase significantly over time!

Joe Kraus: it's a Wikipedia for eBay

jotspotIn a Skype call, Joe Kraus described eBay Wiki to me as "a kind of Wikipedia for eBay and about eBay". He said its main focus is to give "tips and tricks on how to get the most out of eBay". The Wiki will complement and build on the eBay forums, in that the wiki will be a "single point of reference" on topics. 

Joe sees eBay Wiki as another step towards wikis coming of age and becoming mainstream. I agree, the use of wikis from one of the Internet's biggest consumer companies may be vital to their uptake outside of tech and enterprise circles. Joe said eBay will promote the Wiki as part of their community hub and eBay CEO Meg Whitman is announcing it in her keynote address at the eBay Live! user conference in Las Vegas today.

Movable Type search results powered by Fast Search

RWW SPONSORS



ReadWriteCloud - Sponsored by VMware and Intel






RWW PARTNERS